Charges dropped against Trumps campaign manager

christiefan915 said:
:palm: I can't believe you said that. What does economic, social and political equality have to do with grabbing?
Click to expand...

It's true. Isn't the goal of feminism equality? Feminists want equality as long as it involves the benefits of being equal. When it involves having to do the same things as men, equality is out the window. With all the push for equality, why does one never hear feminists push for 18 year old females having to sign up for selective service like 18 year old males as just one example?
 
from what I heard.....prosecutorial discretion is used in that the Trump aide could have been seen acting reasonably by stopping someone
reaching for (at ) their candidate....apparently being an aide is also some tie to being a security entity -for the candidate.

Least that's how I heard the florida blurb
 
Legion Troll said:
Let's see if they like the result on Election Night when the womens' votes are being reported.
Click to expand...


Women were going to vote Hillary regardless of who she runs against. She has the same thing between her legs, at least we can assume she does, as other women. It will be much like blacks did with Obama.
 
Konono said:
Are you claiming he bought off the prosecutor?

The prosecutor's point was, that this is technically a battery, but that no jury would find this is a battery as most people think of a battery as doing great harm, not grabbing someone by the arm. In other words, had he grabbed her, threw her to the ground and started beating on her, he would prosecute. Basically, if this was between two people who not not in the news, no one would be charged.
Click to expand...

If the legal definition of battery was read to the jury, along with showing them the film and the bruises, they would be derelict in not taking it all under consideration.

This is the legal definition and it applies to Fields. "... if there is only the slightest intentional touching of another, which is harmful or offensive and also non-consensual (such as reaching out and touching a woman's thigh), a battery has occurred..."
 
Konono said:
So your BFF Legion Troll is on forced ignore and still can't stop talking about me. :rofl2:

Do you think I'm the poster he keeps referring to? You seem to agree. If so, I feel bad for you for being duped by a Troll. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

Believe me I'm not duped by anybody. You are not the real Konono. Case closed.
 
christiefan915 said:
If the legal definition of battery was read to the jury, along with showing them the film and the bruises, they would be derelict in not taking it all under consideration.

This is the legal definition and it applies to Fields. "... if there is only the slightest intentional touching of another, which is harmful or offensive and also non-consensual (such as reaching out and touching a woman's thigh), a battery has occurred..."
Click to expand...

So, now you're a legal expert?

You ever bumped into someone where there was a large crowd? Who's to say that the person you slightly touch couldn't consider what you did as intentional?
 
CFM said:
It's true. Isn't the goal of feminism equality? Feminists want equality as long as it involves the benefits of being equal. When it involves having to do the same things as men, equality is out the window. With all the push for equality, why does one never hear feminists push for 18 year old females having to sign up for selective service like 18 year old males as just one example?
Click to expand...

This is one of the dumbest things I ever read. You're saying it's okay for men to push each other around so women should get used to having it done to them also. Since when is pushing and shoving a gender issue?

You cons often bitch and moan about women in the military, they're not tough enough, they can't lift heavy stuff, they shouldn't be on the front battle lines, blah blah blah. Yet you do a fast reversal if it means bashing feminists.
 
CFM said:
So, now you're a legal expert?

You ever bumped into someone where there was a large crowd? Who's to say that the person you slightly touch couldn't consider what you did as intentional?
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Still ignoring her bruises. Reading Findlaw doesn't make me a legal expert but not reading it? As the saying goes "ignorance of the law is no excuse."
 
christiefan915 said:
This is one of the dumbest things I ever read. You're saying it's okay for men to push each other around so women should get used to having it done to them also. Since when is pushing and shoving a gender issue?

You cons often bitch and moan about women in the military, they're not tough enough, they can't lift heavy stuff, they shouldn't be on the front battle lines, blah blah blah. Yet you do a fast reversal if it means bashing feminists.
Click to expand...

If that's what you got out of what I said, what you wrote was the dumbest thing anyone could ever read.

So you don't believe females should have to do selective service like males? Didn't think so hypocrite. The only gripe I have about women in the military is they aren't on the front lines EQUAL to MEN. When are you going to push for that? That's right, you're not. My statement stands about feminists wanting equality when it benefits but don't give a damn about it when it means having to do something you don't like.
 
CFM said:
If that's what you got out of what I said, what you wrote was the dumbest thing anyone could ever read.

So you don't believe females should have to do selective service like males? Didn't think so hypocrite. The only gripe I have about women in the military is they aren't on the front lines EQUAL to MEN. When are you going to push for that? That's right, you're not. My statement stands about feminists wanting equality when it benefits but don't give a damn about it when it means having to do something you don't like.
Click to expand...

Why don't Y O U push for women to sign up when they're 18? We have a volunteer military and signing up isn't the same as being called up. If the govt. makes it law that women need to sign up I'm good with that.
 
christiefan915 said:
Why don't Y O U push for women to sign up when they're 18? We have a volunteer military and signing up isn't the same as being called up. If the govt. makes it law that women need to sign up I'm good with that.
Click to expand...

I have. I'm waiting for the feminists who claim they want equality to support me. I've yet to find any including yourself.

Signing up for selective service is the law for MALES between 18 and 25. As a feminist, you should be pushing for that equality. If a male was benefiting from something a woman didn't get and it was based on a law, you'd be the first to bitch about women not being equal. My statement stands that you feminist push for equality when it's something you like but the hell with it if you don't like it. Thanks for backing up my claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top