Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

  • No, but it would soothe their "feels"

    Votes: 4 40.0%

  • No because visitors from those regions could still scare conservatives

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • No, because there are homegrown terrorists right here in the US

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • No, because people with dark skin live here too. So do Muslims

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Yes, if the region = the whole world

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Yes, because I'm scared and I wet myself when I think of Muslims

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
PostmodernProphet said:
to vette or not to vette.....that is the liberal dilemma......if they vette, they feel they aren't being sympathetic to the freedom fighters who want to bomb the fuck out of the hateful Americans.....if they don't vette, Americans may die........ah, the liberals have solved their dilemma.......why vette...."what difference does it make" as Shrillary would say.....
Click to expand...

"Vette"? Here, let me help you out. (What was that comment about you teaching someone how to spell?)

vet: to appraise, verify, or check for accuracy, authenticity, validity, etc.:

An expert vetted the manuscript before publication.
 
christiefan915 said:
"Vette"? Here, let me help you out. (What was that comment about you teaching someone how to spell?)

vet: to appraise, verify, or check for accuracy, authenticity, validity, etc.:

An expert vetted the manuscript before publication.
Click to expand...

Are you the spelling police now, you stupid piece of shit for a woman?
 
I Love America said:
Who said all want to? I think it is clear a significant number do want to and are serious about it. You and the Thingy types seem to think 100% of them need to want to in order to do something.

Do you have a magic 8 ball that can tell the ones who do from the ones who don't?
Click to expand...

If I had a Magic 8 ball that was genuinely predictive I'd use it here in the US first. Because it's clear we have more to fear from homegrown extremists than Muslims. I wonder if you will ever acknowledge the truth of this.

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/u...es-perceptions-of-top-terror-threat.html?_r=0
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
I have to ask lol. Who are these dangerous people?
Click to expand...

WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/us...reat.html?_r=0
 
christiefan915 said:
WASHINGTON — In the 14 years since Al Qaeda carried out attacks on New York and the Pentagon, extremists have regularly executed smaller lethal assaults in the United States, explaining their motives in online manifestoes or social media rants.

But the breakdown of extremist ideologies behind those attacks may come as a surprise. Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims: 48 have been killed by extremists who are not Muslim, including the recent mass killing in Charleston, S.C., compared with 26 by self-proclaimed jihadists, according to a count by New America, a Washington research center.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/us...reat.html?_r=0
Click to expand...

The problem with that analysis is that it's been relatively quite on the Islamist front in this country---since 9/11. They've been relegated to nuisance status, in fact. [murdering scores of people over the course of years ranks as a 'nuisance' in national security terms]

Thanks largely to national security measures started under Bush The Hated and continued later under Obama.

But that can all change by tomorrow. And if I wanted to put white domestic terrorists in a bad a light as possible I'd start counting post 9/11. That's slick lol.
 
Gaylord Focker said:
It's lame, lol. Why is it important to you that Muslims don't come off looking worse than white supremacists. You have some sort of agenda?
Click to expand...

Where did you get that from, lol?

Facts are facts.

Before 9/11, domestic terrorists ruled the terror stats in America.

After 9/11, ditto.

For one day almost 16 years ago, jihadist terrorists got on the scoreboard, and you want to ignore everything else, Nurse?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
The problem with that analysis is that it's been relatively quite on the Islamist front in this country---since 9/11. They've been relegated to nuisance status, in fact. [murdering scores of people over the course of years ranks as a 'nuisance' in national security terms]

Thanks largely to national security measures started under Bush The Hated and continued later under Obama.

But that can all change by tomorrow. And if I wanted to put white domestic terrorists in a bad a light as possible I'd start counting post 9/11. That's slick lol.
Click to expand...

I can dig up some stats for pre-9/11 but don't see how that'll put the homegrown terrorists in a better light.
 
christiefan915 said:
"Vette"? Here, let me help you out. (What was that comment about you teaching someone how to spell?)

vet: to appraise, verify, or check for accuracy, authenticity, validity, etc.:

An expert vetted the manuscript before publication.
Click to expand...

do we need to vette vets?.......I think its safe enough to let them into the country after they finish their tours......or do you want to vet the Syrians?......perhaps its because liberals don't think they're good enough for doctors or physicians.......just give them some horse liniment, eh Chrispy?.....
 
Chrispy, Buckle and Lesion want to vet the refugees......here they are learning how.....

images
 
Pastor PiMPle said:
do we need to vette vets?.......I think its safe enough to let them into the country after they finish their tours......or do you want to vet the Syrians?......perhaps its because liberals don't think they're good enough for doctors or physicians.......just give them some horse liniment, eh Chrispy?.....
Click to expand...

Vette? :rofl2:

Produce the chapter and verse that commands Christian businesspersons to deny service to homosexuals, Pastor PiMPle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top