Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

  • No, but it would soothe their "feels"

    Votes: 4 40.0%
  • No because visitors from those regions could still scare conservatives

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • No, because there are homegrown terrorists right here in the US

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • No, because people with dark skin live here too. So do Muslims

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Yes, if the region = the whole world

    Votes: 1 10.0%
  • Yes, because I'm scared and I wet myself when I think of Muslims

    Votes: 1 10.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
tap that toe......

Larry ‘Wide Stance’ Craig Is Back! And Guilty! Again!

larrycraigmug4-600x376.jpg


Life is full of important lessons. Look both ways before crossing the street. If you are a professional sportsball player, don’t domestic violence a woman on video. Ladies, don’t get raped. And today, we learn a political lesson: If you are a closeted Republican politician soliciting anonymous gay sex in airport bathrooms, you CANNOT use campaign funds to try to reverse your guilty plea. Who knew?!?

A federal judge Tuesday ordered former senator Larry “Wide Stance” Craig (R-Idaho) to pay the U.S. Treasury $242,000 for improperly using campaign funds to pay for his legal defense after a 2007 sex-sting arrest in a Minneapolis airport bathroom.

What did he do wrong this time? After he was arrested and pleaded guilty, Craig had a change of heart and decided to try to withdraw his guilty plea, despite the best science that says withdrawal is an ineffective method of guilt control. In order to pay for his legal defense, Craig looked around and saw a sweet-ass campaign war chest just sitting there, untapped. Never one to resist temptation, Craig went for it, hoping he wouldn’t be caught. Because why not?

Now there is a rule that politicians can use campaign funds to fight legal battles that are connected to campaign and official duties. Politicians do write the rules, after all. However, the FEC argued, and a federal judge agreed, that Craig’s attempts to engage in illicit gay sexytime in a public restroom and his subsequent attempts to withdraw his guilty plea were somehow unrelated to his official duties as a U.S.-American Senator. Shocker!

Are you too young to remember the glory(hole) that was Senator Wide Stance? It ranks up there as one of the top political-anonymous-airport-gay-sex scandals of ALL TIME. Here’s a summary from Roll Call:

Craig’s legal troubles began seven years ago, on June 11, 2007. Craig was arrested by a plainclothes police officer who was investigating lewd conduct complaints in a men’s public restroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.

Here’s the police report from that incident:

“At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly.”

And that’s when Sen. Craig gave the most wonderful excuse of all time. He certainly was not in that bathroom for some illicit gay sexytime with a stranger. Because he is married. TO A WOMAN! Rather:

Craig stated “that he has a wide stance when going to the bathroom and that his foot may have touched mine,” the report states.

He will now be forever remembered as the Senator with the widest stance. And also the Senator who tried to solicit anonymous gay sex in an airport bathroom. But Craig would probably prefer the wide stance thing.

So now the disgraced Senator has to repay the Treasury, and even pay a fine! If he wants to travel to Washington to #PayTheFuckUp in person, we’re sure that there are connecting flights through Minneapolis. Maybe this won’t be such a bad thing for Craig after all.


Read more at http://wonkette.com/562118/larry-wide-stance-craig-is-back-and-guilty-again#tDGqkYYrBj4q3mZH.99
 
Wonder why none of the cons are criticizing Mrs. Craig for staying with Larry after his homosexuality and criminal behaviour became public? </rhetorical>
 
its wonderful to see that liberals have their priorities in order when it comes to vetting Syrian refugees......they will double check to see if any of them are Larry Craig......the world is safer.......
 
its wonderful to see that liberals have their priorities in order when it comes to vetting Syrian refugees......they will double check to see if any of them are Larry Craig......the world is safer.......

Does Larry Craig drive a Vette? I wouldn't think he could fit his "wide stance" in the relatively narrow leg room a Vette provides.
 
Looks like we need to add another "region" to ILAs' list: Britain


At least 800 people from the UK have traveled to support or fight for jihadist organizations in Syria and Iraq, say the British authorities. About half have since returned to the UK.

This BBC News database is the most comprehensive online record of its kind, telling the story of more than 180 Britons who have died, been convicted of offenses relating to the conflict or are still in the region.


_88937801_where_jihadists_come_from_24_03_2016.png



http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32026985
 
Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

Looks like we need to add another "region" to ILAs' list: Britain


At least 800 people from the UK have traveled to support or fight for jihadist organizations in Syria and Iraq, say the British authorities. About half have since returned to the UK.

This BBC News database is the most comprehensive online record of its kind, telling the story of more than 180 Britons who have died, been convicted of offenses relating to the conflict or are still in the region.


_88937801_where_jihadists_come_from_24_03_2016.png



http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32026985

Actually I would halt all immigration for 10 years. We have enough people don't you think?

Problem solved. Now you don't have to worry about getting your feelings hurt.

Now kindly go fuck an AIDS infested muslime
 
Actually I would halt all immigration for 10 years.

That's not what you said earlier, is it?

I don't favor banning a religion. I favor banning a region.

Pretty simple actually. No immigration from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Africa, Saudi Arabja, Israel etc.


Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.
 
Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

That's not what you said earlier, is it?






Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

According to you there is no immigration problem. So why worry?
 
According to you there is no immigration problem. So why worry?

When did I say there is no immigration problem?

Cite.

I'll understand if you can't.

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.
 
Would banning immigration from "regions" make the US a safe space for conservatives?

When did I say there is no immigration problem?

Cite.

I'll understand if you can't.

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.

Don't worry I know you think we need even more unskilled labor. A you needs ya some oranges picked right homey?
 
Don't worry I know you think we need even more unskilled labor. A you needs ya some oranges picked right homey?

You're incoherent.

Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.
 
The loser is losing it.

It's funny that he doesn't want to ban immigrants from the UK, given the numbers of terrorists that come from there.


Stay on topic, or this thread will be moved to the war zone, where you will find all threads that devolve to back and forth insults.
 
Back
Top