Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

CFM said:
Still spouting that anarchist bullshit I see.

The constitution of the U.S. doesn't apply to foreigners that have stated an intention of coming here no matter how much you think it does.

Just be honest. You want open borders and very limited rules about who can come in and who can't.
Click to expand...

if you want to call the framers of the US Constitution 'anarchists', then i'll happily be called one as well. I'm reading from the constitution and bill of rights directly, so unless you have some super secret document that shows James Madison laughing his ass off at the 'gotcha' he pulled on those who ratified the constitution and bill of rights, you're simply wrong.
 
Stelakh said:
The Supreme Court has the authority, inherent and implied, of judicial review.
Click to expand...
wrongly assumed power is still wrongly assumed, even if it comes from a USSC decision.

Stelakh said:
I may not agree with all of their decisions, but in placing limitations on provisions of the Constitution, they are well within their authority.
Click to expand...
you must be under the public education systems indoctrination program of believing that the USSC wrote the constitution and bill of rights, in short telling we the people what our rights are and what they are not.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
if you want to call the framers of the US Constitution 'anarchists', then i'll happily be called one as well. I'm reading from the constitution and bill of rights directly, so unless you have some super secret document that shows James Madison laughing his ass off at the 'gotcha' he pulled on those who ratified the constitution and bill of rights, you're simply wrong.
Click to expand...

You aren't in line with what they believed. You've convinced yourself you are but those smarter than you, and that's just about anyone, know better.

You think those never having been here that request to come have constitutional protections. Since you do, you're the last one to be telling the rest of us what something means. Fool.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yes, because there are only two kinds of governmental systems in our nation...that of tyranny and that of anarchy :palm:
Click to expand...

It took a while but you admitted that any action by the government is wrong when it won't let you do what you WANT to do. In other words, you consider it tyranny because you can't have it your way. Keep whining bitch. You're easy to figure out.
 
Stelakh said:
I'll bite. How is that?

All right, all right. I admit it. I'm extremely bored.
Click to expand...

it was a meme that the liberals/anti-gunners were using to show the difference between an open carry activist and a mass shooter.

1192ckCOMIC-open-carry-patriots.png
 
CFM said:
You aren't in line with what they believed. You've convinced yourself you are but those smarter than you, and that's just about anyone, know better.

You think those never having been here that request to come have constitutional protections. Since you do, you're the last one to be telling the rest of us what something means. Fool.
Click to expand...

this just means that you're an authoritarian statist. my thinking is most definitely in line with the framers. yours is in line with the dictators.
 
CFM said:
It took a while but you admitted that any action by the government is wrong when it won't let you do what you WANT to do. In other words, you consider it tyranny because you can't have it your way. Keep whining bitch. You're easy to figure out.
Click to expand...

you're even dumber than desh. I said no such thing, but you keep thinking your idiocy.
 
Jarod said:
No, the 14th Equal Protection clause only applies to those "within a states jurisdiction"
Click to expand...

People who are not citizens or permanent residents, who are outside of US sovereign territory, are probably not within US jurisdiction, either.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
wrongly assumed power is still wrongly assumed, even if it comes from a USSC decision.


you must be under the public education systems indoctrination program of believing that the USSC wrote the constitution and bill of rights, in short telling we the people what our rights are and what they are not.
Click to expand...

Translation: I should be able to do whatever I want when I want and no one can tell me otherwise.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
this just means that you're an authoritarian statist. my thinking is most definitely in line with the framers. yours is in line with the dictators.
Click to expand...

Based on what you think? You're not man enough to admit what you are so no one believes what you think is correct. Run along and let real men get the job done while you hide like a little bitch.
 
CFM said:
The Constitution doesn't apply to someone from another country because they request permission to come here.

I'm not talking about citizens leaving and returning. I thought that was clear but apparently not to you.

Strange how those like you admonish Donald Trump yet praise the very President who imprisoned U.S. citizens solely because of their Japanese heritage.
Click to expand...

I think that action was both unconstitutional and inchonsable.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
wrongly assumed power is still wrongly assumed, even if it comes from a USSC decision.
Click to expand...

Rather like certain "unenumerated rights," then? Where do those rights not specifically granted under the Constitution stop? The argument is the same. The Supreme Court has not just a right but a duty to engage in judicial review in order to ensure that laws are, in fact, Constitutional and to strike down those laws that are not.

SmarterthanYou said:
you must be under the public education systems indoctrination program of believing that the USSC wrote the constitution and bill of rights, in short telling we the people what our rights are and what they are not.
Click to expand...

In fact I'm well aware of who wrote the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. I'm also well aware that those who wrote it, most notably Madison and Jefferson, addressed the idea of judicial review outside of the Constitutional framework (Jefferson didn't like it, Madison thought it was important - Federalist No. 39 and 44 - although he was worried it would elevate the judiciary above the legislature.).
 
Jarod said:
No, the 14th Equal Protection clause only applies to those "within a states jurisdiction"
Click to expand...

As the 1st amendment does also.....Muslims can practice their religion in US ...There is nothing in the constitution that says we MUST allow anyone to enter the country.....

Allowing immigration is OUR call, not anyone else....Our laws are for those "within our jurisdiction" .....
 
CFM said:
Since they aren't here and haven't been here, the protections you say they have don't exist for them, therefore, can't be denied.
Click to expand...

False, they would be prevented from coming her based on religion, clearly religious discrimination. Pure and simple.

There are hundreds of millions of muslims who are not inclined to violence. There is no rational basis for banning the entire religion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top