Fair Game?

Using a Verimetrics Instrument, a cutting edge computerized psychological stress evaluator and lie detector that measures stress levels in a person's voice, Harwood has concluded that Broaddrick did have a sexual encounter with Clinton on the day she claims he sexually assaulted her, but it wasn't forced.
 
And clearly you don't either Jarod because as Vox has shown only Clinton and Broderick know what happened in that room and if the woman is to believed Clinton is guilty and you don't think so.
 

I think it's possible something happened between her and Clinton. But when the woman lied under oath and then recanted, it's fair to question her veracity. Link within your link:

"Her story circulated in Arkansas for years and when Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992, his enemies tried to get her to tell the world. She refused. Five years later, she opened her door to find private investigators representing Paula Jones. Still, she would not talk. "I wouldn't relive it for anything," she told them.

In the 15 months since, countless others have come calling. Agents sent by independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr. The House Republican managers prosecuting President Clinton at his impeachment trial. Reporters from around the globe. She has talked and exchanged electronic mail with scandal impresario Lucianne Goldberg and once sought advice from Clinton accuser Kathleen E. Willey. Regular updates about her are posted on the Internet and dissected on talk radio...

...When Jones's attorneys first subpoenaed her in their sexual harassment lawsuit against the president, Broaddrick swore out an affidavit and testified in a deposition that Clinton did not make unwelcome sexual advances toward her in the late 1970s."

Broaddrick later recanted her sworn testimony in the Jones suit under a promise of immunity from Starr, saying she lied initially because she did not want to be drawn into the case against the president...

Starr investigated briefly but dropped it after determining that it did not fit the pattern of obstruction of justice he was investigating because she stated Clinton never tried to influence her story. House Republicans urged wavering colleagues in December to read the sealed records of Broaddrick's FBI interview to shore up support for impeachment. And the House managers secretly contacted her to say they might summon her as a witness, yet quickly decided that her allegations were not relevant to the articles of impeachment they were prosecuting in the Senate...

Broaddrick never reported the alleged incident to authorities and said it never occurred to her to do so, because Clinton was a rising politician while she was "young and vulnerable" and in the middle of an extramarital affair...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/janedoe022099.htm
 
What expert?

You didn't give any FACTS you fucking retard. The only FACT here is that you are doing everything to blame the victim, because the one accused is a member of your party.

Desh = Party over people

The fact that repub clowns are bringing this up shows their level of desperation. You're blaming Hillary for what her husband did. Why aren't you oafs blaming Camille for what her husband did, or Anna for what her husband did?

I'm not surprised you don't see the gender insult in your comments.... and you cons are always touting personal responsibility.
 
only to a partisan hack

giphy.gif
 
a voice expert said she was lying



two of the people that she claim she told them years ago had a dad who was murdered by someone clinton pardoned.


she went to a clinton fund raiser three weeks later.

she was cheating on her husband at the time.


her husband was rumored to be abusive


she likely had sex with Clinton willingly and got caught by her abusive hubby


she signed a court document saying the rape didn't happen
 
LMAO... because she didn't want to be dragged into the scandal in front of the nation... yep... shocking.

Desh =Party over people

:rolleyes: She wouldn't have been dragged into a scandal in 1978.

What kind of lame logic is this anyway? It was Clinton accusers who brought her into the picture in the 1990s, people who were supposedly on her side.
 
:rolleyes: She wouldn't have been dragged into a scandal in 1978.

What kind of lame logic is this anyway? It was Clinton accusers who brought her into the picture in the 1990s, people who were supposedly on her side.

This is just the saqme desperate flailing we saw when Bill ran for office back in 92.

Between now and election day expect Right Wing partisan hacks to make up the WORST kind of shit and throw it all against the wall to see what sticks.
 
Back
Top