Fair Game?

cawacko said:
This is the very end of a good article on the subject from the liberal Vox.


But the Clinton critics have a point. There is a crucial tension between "believe survivors" and the "Juanita Broaddrick is lying" position of some Clinton defenders, lacking further information.

One answer might be giving up the former position. Many, including Harvard Law's Jeannie Suk, have argued that defaulting to believing every accusation of rape "harms the overall credibility of sexual assault claims," given that false claims do happen, albeit quite rarely. But whatever the merits of that view, adopting it would be a big pivot for Hillary Clinton, given that just a couple of months ago she was tweeting, "Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported." There's no easy way to reconcile that view with her allies' dismissal of Broaddrick's allegations.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick
Click to expand...

this liberal site to intellectual for you Desh?
 
The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_.../is_juanita_broaddrick_telling_the_truth.html
 
evince said:
when you are in denial you don't tell people you have been raped.

do you understand how that works?
Click to expand...

Are you an idiot? Do you think the emotional response of a woman that has been raped is consistent? Women who are abused (men too for that matter) often go in and out of denial. It isn't a steady emotional state due to the trauma they have gone through.

But you go on trying to defend your party over the well being of a woman. It shows just how sociopathic and pathetic you are.
 
Desh asks why a woman cheating on her husband didn't tell her husband she was raped while cheating on him.

You can't make this up.
 
evince said:
there is no poof that this happened as claimed.


there is only her words and the words of a couple other people who hate clinton
Click to expand...

Yes Desh... in most rape cases there aren't witnesses to the rape. Other than you perhaps, who would stand by and watch a woman get raped?

The same stupid shit was said about Cosby... do you think those women are lying too?
 
cawacko said:
Desh asks why a woman cheating on her husband didn't tell her husband she was raped while cheating on him.

You can't make this up.
Click to expand...

It is truly comical watching her defend her party while bashing any woman who dares speak out about the abusive behavior of a man we all KNOW cheated on his wife. She will do anything, regardless of whether it is ethical or not, to defend her party.
 
evince said:
The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_.../is_juanita_broaddrick_telling_the_truth.html
Click to expand...

You don't even know what the hell you wrote Desh. And you posted it originally as if they were your own words.
 
Btw IF she was raped then the fact that she cheated on him didn't come into the issue huh.


it would have been a crime why wouldn't she tell hum about a crime committed against her


you make no sense
 
Superfreak said:
Keep defending your hero... you are party over people. Fuck those women who dare say anything bad about your hero. Who cares if they were raped or not... they are talking about a Democrat!!!
Click to expand...

I gave you FACTS


you dont like those FACTS


why would an expert think she was lying?
 
evince said:
I gave you FACTS
you dont like those FACTS
why would an expert think she was lying?
Click to expand...

What expert?

You didn't give any FACTS you fucking retard. The only FACT here is that you are doing everything to blame the victim, because the one accused is a member of your party.

Desh = Party over people
 
There us also the republican partys record of lying about the Clintons and people like war hero John Kerry.



you guys make up scandals
 
cawacko said:
This is the very end of a good article on the subject from the liberal Vox.


But the Clinton critics have a point. There is a crucial tension between "believe survivors" and the "Juanita Broaddrick is lying" position of some Clinton defenders, lacking further information.

One answer might be giving up the former position. Many, including Harvard Law's Jeannie Suk, have argued that defaulting to believing every accusation of rape "harms the overall credibility of sexual assault claims," given that false claims do happen, albeit quite rarely. But whatever the merits of that view, adopting it would be a big pivot for Hillary Clinton, given that just a couple of months ago she was tweeting, "Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported." There's no easy way to reconcile that view with her allies' dismissal of Broaddrick's allegations.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrick
Click to expand...

You won't read this Desh because it's not a hack piece. Even though it's a liberal site it's actually a straight forward article. You won't recognize the duality of Hillary's stance here.

That's ok. Party over women for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top