Ted ‘Carpet-Bomb’ Cruz

evince said:
taken seriously by whom?



you and and your ilk don't take anything seriously
Click to expand...

Lady, you are so far away from rational discussion as to warrant a rescue party armed with 20 miles of rope, fire safe suits, and grappling hooks in order to descend the precipice of hell.

Are 2400 dead civilians from drones the result of "sniper like" precision?
 
christiefan915 said:
Did you support the war in Iraq? Did you vote twice for bush?

I did neither.
Click to expand...

of course I voted for Bush twice......though I admit, if we had had the budget of 2006 before 2004 I would not have voted for him in 2004 (or course that couldn't have happened because the Republicans still had control of Congress in 2004)......the reason you're so fucked up is that you think Republicans intentionally TARGET civilians like the terrorists do......I suspect its because of your liberal mindset........it keeps you from thinking......
 
Last edited:
christiefan915 said:
You can pretend it's a lie because there's no other defense for him.

And you're still trying to deflect from your lie about Rana's map and blacks.
Click to expand...

actually I can point out that its a lie because of what he said and you quoted.......and what I said about Rana's map and blacks is also true, as can be seen by anyone who isn't too lazy to look at eight news events.........again, the reason you are wrong is that you are a liberal and therefore, a fucking idiot........if you weren't such an idiot perhaps those simple facts would convince you...........
 
evince said:
what lie you fucking sociopath?

where is this lie of hers you claim

Go get the post
Click to expand...


Desh, if you haven't read it three times already you haven't been following this thread......I refuse to discuss things with someone who refuses to read the thread......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
of course I voted for Bush twice......though I admit, if we had had the budget of 2006 before 2004 I would not have voted for him in 2004 (or course that couldn't have happened because the Republicans still had control of Congress in 2004)......the reason you're so fucked up is that you think Republicans intentionally TARGET civilians like the terrorists do......I suspect its because of your liberal mindset........it keeps you from thinking......
Click to expand...

So you supported killing innocent citizens. Only an idiot would think you can wage war without killing people who aren't the enemy.

Then again, maybe you think all Iraqis are the enemy, not just the fighters.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
actually I can point out that its a lie because of what he said and you quoted.......and what I said about Rana's map and blacks is also true, as can be seen by anyone who isn't too lazy to look at eight news events.........again, the reason you are wrong is that you are a liberal and therefore, a fucking idiot........if you weren't such an idiot perhaps those simple facts would convince you...........
Click to expand...

Keep flailing, it's amusing to see you default to invective. Typical con maneuver.

I did look at all eight events linked on Rana's map and none of the eight mentioned race. You didn't get your info from Rana's map as you claimed, you got it from other sources.
 
christiefan915 said:
So you supported killing innocent citizens. Only an idiot would think you can wage war without killing people who aren't the enemy.

Then again, maybe you think all Iraqis are the enemy, not just the fighters.
Click to expand...

that's life....I voted for Bush so I supported killing innocent citizens......you voted to keep abortion legal, so you supported killing 60 million innocent unborn children......that's death......
 
christiefan915 said:
Keep flailing, it's amusing to see you default to invective. Typical con maneuver.

I did look at all eight events linked on Rana's map and none of the eight mentioned race. You didn't get your info from Rana's map as you claimed, you got it from other sources.
Click to expand...

yeah right...its got nothing to do with blacks, alcohol, drugs and violence.......its about news sources.......preach it sistah!........kill them Bloods!.......kill them Knights of the Round Table Van/Truck Club riders!........
 
christiefan915 said:
Once more for the clueless. I SUPPORT OBAMA'S USE OF DRONES AND ALWAYS HAVE. Is that loud enough for you?

I've said the same thing in this thread and every other thread where the topic was brought up. So take your phony hypocrisy claim and stick it.
Click to expand...

Just as everyone suspected.
 
J Craft said:
Lady, you are so far away from rational discussion as to warrant a rescue party armed with 20 miles of rope, fire safe suits, and grappling hooks in order to descend the precipice of hell.

Are 2400 dead civilians from drones the result of "sniper like" precision?
Click to expand...




first you must document that claim
 
We cannot simply bomb our way to safety any more than we could tax our way out of debt. That is not a strategy it is a bumper sticker.
 
evince said:
first you must document that claim
Click to expand...


How does this grab you desh ?



Nearly 90 Percent Of People Killed In Recent Drone Strikes Were Not The Target
U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.
10/15/2015 11:52 am ET | Updated Oct 20, 2015

Marina Fang
Associate Politics Editor, The Huffington Post

X

The controversial U.S. drone strike program in the Middle East aims to pinpoint and kill terrorist leaders, but new documents indicate that a staggering number of these "targeted killings" affect far more people than just their targets.

According to a new report from The Intercept, nearly 90 percent of people killed in recent drone strikes in Afghanistan "were not the intended targets" of the attacks.

Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.

The report, compiled from classified documents released by a source in the intelligence community, corroborates the many news accounts of civilian deaths caused by drone strikes. U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia since 2009.

In December 2013, a drone strike in Yemen killed 14 people returning from a wedding. Government officials mistook their vehicles for those of al Qaeda militants. Parents in Pakistan have reported taking their children out of school to protect them from possible strikes.

The U.S. government has implemented targeted killings since the Sept. 11 attacks as a counterterrorism measure and as retribution against al Qaeda and the Taliban. Under the Obama administration, many of these targeted killings have been carried out using unmanned drones. Despite the high number of civilian casualties and criticism that the program lacks transparency, President Barack Obama has repeatedly defended the strikes.

"The terrorists we are after target civilians, and the death toll from their acts of terrorism against Muslims dwarfs any estimate of civilian casualties from drone strikes," he said in 2013.
 
Damocles said:
We cannot simply bomb our way to safety any more than we could tax our way out of debt. That is not a strategy it is a bumper sticker.
Click to expand...

So what rock do you intend to hide under when the terrorists come to your neighborhood.....

or do you seriously believe they won't come to your part of town sometime....I guess we could all convert to Islam, then they might leave you live and breathe for awhile longer.
 
NOVA said:
So what rock do you intend to hide under when the terrorists come to your neighborhood.....
Click to expand...
What an inane question. I would simply shoot people who tried to come and kill my family. What has that to do with the price of rice in China?

or do you seriously believe they won't come to your part of town sometime....I guess we could all convert to Islam, then they might leave you live and breathe for awhile longer.
Click to expand...

I think that we must do more than bomb if we truly want to end this particular war that is "not a war".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top