Ted ‘Carpet-Bomb’ Cruz

Buckly J. Ewer said:
Define "thugs" BLABO ...
Do you mean the Fux Snooze definition of thug or the dictionary definition?
Poor BLABO.
Click to expand...

Well, shit for brains,....there is only one definition in my English language, it you've got something different, I suggest you go for your GED.

Poor Asshole Troll
 
christiefan915 said:
You're slipping Pmp,...really slipping. What Cruz's statement means is that no one wants to target innocent civilians but when you carpet bomb an area you will inevitably kill innocent civilians but hey, shit happens... collateral casualties.

If he supports carpet bombing he supports killing innocent civilians. Case closed.
Click to expand...

First of all, he didn't say that. But even if he did, by how do you know they are "innocent?"
 
christiefan915 said:
If Cruz supports carpet bombing then he supports every casualty that arises from the bombing. You think a citizens' mass evacuation notice is going to be sent before the bombing starts?

Use you head and stop trying to score because it just makes you look silly.
Click to expand...

And when Obama supports killing people with drones, then he supports every casualty that arises from the bombing, right?
 
christiefan915 said:
Dumbshit Cruz supports committing a war crime and you guys love him. Pat yourselves on the back for your lack of humanity.

"Carpet bombing, also known as saturation bombing, is a large aerial bombing done in a progressive manner to inflict damage in every part of a selected area of land.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP][SUP][4][/SUP] The phrase evokes the image of explosions completely covering an area, in the same way that a carpet covers a floor. Carpet bombing is usually achieved by dropping many unguided bombs.

Carpet bombing is considered a war crime[SUP][6][/SUP] as of the 1977 Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions."
Click to expand...

Doesn't your ass just flame over your overt hypocrisy over the left defending Obama using drones then saying this?

And you are so extrapolating what he meant exactly while Obama actually did kill people with drones. The hypocrisies and double standards of the left are limitless
 
J Craft said:
I wasn't discussing the differences only the hypocrisy. Obama's so called precision bombing isn't precise if it's killing civilians.

The larger point, your dummy ad hom aside, is that you come out against a politicians comment that has caused no actual civilian deaths, all the while ignoring another politicians actions that are actually resulting in dead civilians.

Hypocrisy, Christie, is what that is.
Click to expand...

Once more for the clueless. I DON'T SUPPORT OBAMA'S USE OF DRONES AND NEVER DID. Is that loud enough for you?

I've said the same thing in this thread and every other thread where the topic was brought up. So take your phony hypocrisy claim and stick it.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Cruz used the phrase "carpet bomb" because it was the toughest sounding phrase he could think of that low information voters would grasp.
The comment about "green glowing sand" implies gratuitous nuclear use and is at least as concerning as his careless use of the phrase "carpet bombing".
Nuclear carpet bombing is a means towards genocide, not a tactic to exterminate a few thousand terrorists.
Cruz is insane.
Click to expand...

Yep. He's playing to GOP voters' basest instincts and they're all slurping it up, just like the cons here.
 
kaz said:
Doesn't your ass just flame over your overt hypocrisy over the left defending Obama using drones then saying this?

And you are so extrapolating what he meant exactly while Obama actually did kill people with drones. The hypocrisies and double standards of the left are limitless
Click to expand...

So you want the US to commit even more war crimes than we're already responsible for? I'm not surprised.
 
kaz said:
And when Obama supports killing people with drones, then he supports every casualty that arises from the bombing, right?
Click to expand...

I have never understood the whole hand wringing over drones.



do people hate snipers ?


NO


what is the difference?



the weapon used



if a sniper hits his or her target and shrapnel kills the person shitting next to the target what do you call that?



drones are merely a new weapon with a larger range and bigger payload.


EVERY FUCKING COUNTRY NOW USES THEM


you right wing turds loved them when Bush was behind it
 
christiefan915 said:
Once more for the clueless. I DON'T SUPPORT OBAMA'S USE OF DRONES AND NEVER DID. Is that loud enough for you?

I've said the same thing in this thread and every other thread where the topic was brought up. So take your phony hypocrisy claim and stick it.
Click to expand...

If you want to be taken seriously, leave the cries of outrage over political speech at the door, and start threads of outrage over actual actions like those of Obama's.
 
J Craft said:
If you want to be taken seriously, leave the cries of outrage over political speech at the door, and start threads of outrage over actual actions like those of Obama's.
Click to expand...

The topic is Current Events and Cruz is a current event. You don't like it, don't read it.

Start your own threads about Obama. I don't need a sanctimonious poser telling me what to write.
 
J Craft said:
If you want to be taken seriously, leave the cries of outrage over political speech at the door, and start threads of outrage over actual actions like those of Obama's.
Click to expand...

taken seriously by whom?



you and and your ilk don't take anything seriously
 
christiefan915 said:
Once more for the clueless. I DON'T SUPPORT OBAMA'S USE OF DRONES AND NEVER DID. Is that loud enough for you?

I've said the same thing in this thread and every other thread where the topic was brought up. So take your phony hypocrisy claim and stick it.
Click to expand...

you don't support his use of drones even though you're a Democrat but we supported mass civilian casualties in Iraq because we're Republicans......yes, we understand your logic......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top