For Jarod - Jerry Brown and Pot

[Cancel 2016.2]

I hope you were being sarcastic.

1. He did not come out against legalization, he urged caution and said he is not sure.
2. While he is/was, likely still is my candidate for the Nomination I disagree with his reason for caution, but agree with his urging of caution.
3. Its clear the Republicans are about 90% against legalization and the Democrats are about 50%.

As Yoda would say

"One Governor, the Democratic party is not."

See String... you aren't the only idiot to fail to grasp sarcasm

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Here you go again... trying to hijack another thread. You are that denied basic genetics and biology. You want me to list your errors again?

dear dipshit... I was commenting on a post YOU made in THIS thread. So who is trying to hijack it?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

If he would have indicated that is what the typical science denying Republican believes then it would have been clear.

I understand that this is not proof that Democrats are against legalized pot.

See douche bag... YOU are the one who tried to inject science denial into this thread.

 

[Timshel]

See douche bag... YOU are the one who tried to inject science denial into this thread.

I was just talking, in general, about how dh's comments could serve as the typical idiotic Republican response. You seem to think "science denying Republican" is an attack on you personally, and it's pretty obvious why.

But anyway if you are going to change the subject, I have your grossly errant posts saved for reference and whenever I need a good laugh.

 

[The Dude]

I posted this because Jarod always says it's Republican politicians who are against pot (which many are but clearly many Democrats feel the same way) and Brown is his choice for the Democratic Presidential nomination.

What's Gerry like 90 !
I find it's an age thing below 55 way cooler

 

[NOVA]

YEs, I've posted it before... Ill look for it. Its not 90% but its close.

Here is one poll and you're way off ....



[url]http://www.gallup.com/poll/165539/first-time-americans-favor-legalizing-marijuana.aspx
[/URL]

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I was just talking, in general, about how dh's comments could serve as the typical idiotic Republican response. You seem to think "science denying Republican" is an attack on you personally, and it's pretty obvious why.

But anyway if you are going to change the subject, I have your grossly errant posts saved for reference and whenever I need a good laugh.

LMAO... you saved your own moronic posts? You laugh at yourself? That is good, then we can pretend we are laughing with you and not just at you.

 

[Timshel]

LMAO... you saved your own moronic posts? You laugh at yourself? That is good, then we can pretend we are laughing with you and not just at you.

I laugh about your idiotic rejection of the biological definition of life and claims about the genetic uniqueness or lack thereof of cells within our bodies and sperm/egg.

Yet you just told me that a key point in determining LIFE is the ability to sustain its own life. Hence, everyone on life support is no longer alive. Newborns are no longer alive. People needing elder care are no longer alive. Bunch of zombies running around according to you.

http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Life
Life
Definition


noun, plural: lives


(1) A distinctive characteristic of a living organism from dead organism or non-living thing, as specifically distinguished by the capacity to grow, metabolize, respond (to stimuli), adapt, and reproduce
(2) The biota of a particular region


Supplement


There is no consensus regarding the answer to the question as to when does life begin. Does it begin at the time of fertilization or the time before or after that? The origin of life is also contestable. Despite of the irresolute answer for questions about life, the basic characteristics of a living thing are as follows:


with an organized structure performing a specific function
with an ability to sustain existence, e.g. by nourishment
with an ability to respond to stimuli or to its environment
capable of adapting
with an ability to germinate or reproduce

3) The zygote is a unique human life created by the fertilization of the egg cell by the sperm cell. It is unique genetically from those that created it. The sperm cell has the SAME DNA code as the man whose body created it. The egg cell has the SAME DNA code as the woman whose body created it. When the two combine, there is a unique DNA coding created that has NEVER EXISTED BEFORE.

Straw man... genetic distinction can be found between all types of cells [within the human body].

You are a fucking moron. You don't understand basic genetics, biology or economics and I am surprised you did not join Ditzy in his rejection of basic math and historical facts. You are pretty sharp for a Republican, though.

 

[Rune]

I hope you were being sarcastic.

1. He did not come out against legalization, he urged caution and said he is not sure.
2. While he is/was, likely still is my candidate for the Nomination I disagree with his reason for caution, but agree with his urging of caution.
3. Its clear the Republicans are about 90% against legalization and the Democrats are about 50%.

As Yoda would say

"One Governor, the Democratic party is not."

Jarod, he is 76. 79 going in. 83 coming out. Are you out of your fucking mind?

This OP alone makes it clear how unsuitable he is.

 

[Rune]

I think he's quite bright. The trouble, as I see it, is that lots of people on this here board genuinely believe seriously outlandish shit so its not always easy to knwo what is sarcasm and what is a genuinely held beleif. It doesn't help that names change all the time, too.

Why do you keep changing yours, Nigel?

 

[Anti-Party]

Ouch, this one is going to leave a mark.



California governor unsure legal pot is good plan


California Gov. Jerry Brown said he is not sure legalizing marijuana is a good idea in his state because the country could lose its competitive edge if too many people are getting stoned.

If pot smoking gains more legitimacy in the nation's most populous state, Brown said he worries it could have negative ripple effects.

"The problem with anything, a certain amount is OK. But there is a tendency to go to extremes," he said in a wide-ranging interview aired Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." ''And all of a sudden, if there's advertising and legitimacy, how many people can get stoned and still have a great state or a great nation?"

Californians voted to legalize medical marijuana in 1996. But Brown said he is watching closely to see how Colorado and Washington handle their new laws that go a step further by regulating the growth and sale of taxed recreational marijuana at state-licensed stores. Colorado's pot shops opened Jan. 1, and Washington's are expected to open later this year.

"We have medical marijuana, which gets very close to what they have in Colorado and Washington. I'd really like those two states to show us how it's going to work," he said. "The world's pretty dangerous, very competitive. I think we need to stay alert, if not 24 hours a day, more than some of the potheads might be able to put together."

Brown, who was interviewed remotely from San Francisco, also discussed California's drought problems, climate change and his future political career.

Now, as he prepares to run for his fourth term as governor, Brown said that despite his progressive politics, the key to turning California's budget deficit into a projected multibillion-dollar budget surplus was exerting fiscal discipline.

"You've got to be tough on spending. No matter how liberal you want to be, at the end of the day, fiscal discipline is the fundamental predicate of a free society," he said.

Brown also mused about the Democratic Party's future, saying he favored a Hillary Clinton bid for president in 2016.

"She's got more experience, both domestic and international," he said. "I mean, it's her nomination if she wants it, as far as I'm concerned."


http://www.sfgate.com/news/medical/...nor-unsure-legal-pot-is-good-plan-5282390.php

Quite a few Democrats have already stated this. Once you accept something as legal then bad things can happen. Tobacco became legal and big tobacco started adding excessive amounts of nicotine to keep people addicted.

The democrats I've heard talk about this state that hemp/cannabis should be legal for medical and structural use. But the drug should be illegal with VERY MILD punishment.

 

[Rune]

Quite a few Democrats have already stated this. Once you accept something as legal then bad things can happen. Tobacco became legal and big tobacco started adding excessive amounts of nicotine to keep people addicted.

The democrats I've heard talk about this state that hemp/cannabis should be legal for medical and structural use. But the drug should be illegal with VERY MILD punishment.

This is why I don't bother explaining anything to you, you are not worth the keystrokes. At all. You just don't have the slightest clue what you are on about, yet on and on you go.