They didn't acquit him of murder either...they deadlocked.....actually the charge was Murder 1....premeditated..
It is also true then that the jury didn't convict Dunn of murder isn't it?
They didn't acquit him of murder either...they deadlocked.....actually the charge was Murder 1....premeditated..
Pinheads think they know what you mean.....I know what I read and take that as to be what you mean...I ain't a fuckin' mind reader....
I didn't say you statement was incorrect, I said it wasn't the entire story and that means its misleading....dumbass....
He was not found guilty of jaywalking or bank robbery either....so what.
You start in 1954 by saying ‘Nigger, nigger, nigger.’ By 1968 you can’t say ‘Nigger.’ That hurts you. It backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states rights and all that stuff and you get so abstract. Now you talk about cutting taxes and these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that’s part of it. I’m not saying that. But I’m saying that if it is getting that abstract and that coded, we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. Obviously sitting around saying we want to cut taxes and we want this, is a lot more abstract than even the busing thing and a hell of a lot more abstract than nigger nigger. So anyway you look at it, race is coming on the back burner.
actually, the idiot would be you. Garud made baseless accusations and wacko was calling him out on his nonsense. Clearly you support Garuds idiocy.
I don't think so loopy! She won the debate championship, you haven't won a damn thing here ever, including an argument with anyone on the left that I have noticed! But you do abuse the words dunce and dimwit vociferously.
No in this trial he did get away with murder, he didn't get away with attempted murder, but the jury hung on the murder charge, so Sardonic is correct and you are talking about your ass; nothing new there but it still is applicable nonetheless.
Communism is not what Joseph Stalin practiced or promoted!
"This may sound a bit racial but if more people would arm themselves and kill these fucking idiots when they are threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior."
"These fools feel entitled to live above the law and do violence at will. Remember when your mom was robbed? At Gunpoint? Black Thug."
.......
What do you think? Do these statements sound a bit racial? Do you agree with them? Should we start killing these fucking idiots?
This is what Michael Dunn took from the republican theme about the sense of entitlement that Obama engenders? Im not saying that the Republican party is really trying to stoke anger against black people... but they should look into how what they are saying is taken by certain elements, and what they are doing about it... killing them!
Communism is not what Joseph Stalin practiced or promoted!
Sometimes the truth smarts."This may sound a bit racial but if more people would arm themselves and kill these fucking idiots when they are threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior."
Clearly you weren't following the conversation very well or you got your comments confused or you don't know what you are talking about. I don't know which it is and don't much care; suffice to say your comment above is factually incorrect! Better luck next time. Maybe if we were adding or subtracting you would fare better! It is clear that Dunn sent a letter and the letter contained the quotation Jarod attributed to Dunn. Those are factual statements. Cawacko simply failed to read the original post accurately. That is all I said. It was clear Jarod attributed the quotation to Dunn. Not as concisely as he might have I admit but he did mention Dunn's name in relation to the statement.
Sometimes the truth smarts.
Go easy...Superfreak can't hold a thought and often gets lost mid-sentence.
Is that when he starts with calling people idiots?
Clearly you weren't following the conversation very well or you got your comments confused or you don't know what you are talking about. I don't know which it is and don't much care; suffice to say your comment above is factually incorrect! Better luck next time. Maybe if we were adding or subtracting you would fare better! It is clear that Dunn sent a letter and the letter contained the quotation Jarod attributed to Dunn. Those are factual statements. Cawacko simply failed to read the original post accurately. That is all I said. It was clear Jarod attributed the quotation to Dunn. Not as concisely as he might have I admit but he did mention Dunn's name in relation to the statement.
The thing that most here seem to have forgotten is that Dunn killed Davis with the first seven bullets, none of which he was convicted of shooting. He was convicted on three charges of attempted murder for shooting three bullets at the SUV as it sped away from the scene, because at that time he couldn't argue that anyone in it posed a threat to him. So he was not convicted on the murder charge because he wasn't convicted for the shots that killed davis. Had he stopped shooting once the SUV sped away he would probably not have been charged at all. He most certainly would have been given the same treatment Zommerman got!
LMAO... you sure do enjoy the bloviating. No one said Garud didn't attribute the quotes to dunn. Do try to pay attention and do try to refrain from creating straw men.
The bullshit we called him on, was not in regards to Dunns quote.
My opinion is that we have a case of two parties willing to engage in violence because a group of young blacks think they have the right to blare their music so loud that it is disturbing to all around them and a white dude who felt he had a right to ask them to turn their music down and wasn't going to be intimidated or back down.
It is a sad case of the sad state we have evolved where one group feels it is entitled to do whatever they feel like even if it disturbs those around them and can intimidate them through threats of violence and a leftist ideology that says such behavior has to be tolerated even to societal detriment.
Think I am not making sense? Just look at Detroit. We have a societal choice; we can shrink and run. Or we can say enough is enough and raise our kids to respect others, our laws and decency.
LMAO... you sure do enjoy the bloviating. No one said Garud didn't attribute the quotes to dunn. Do try to pay attention and do try to refrain from creating straw men.
The bullshit we called him on, was not in regards to Dunns quote.
Are we suppose to know who said the above quotes or is that irrelevant?
Or you could have just posted the link to the article so we all could read it instead of giving it to us in bits and pieces without full context and trying to have a discussion off that.
See post # 79. Idiot... try to remember what you have argued from one post to the next, before you start making your shit up... Dunce!