Ishmael Pequod
Banned
My personal belief is evolution within each species, but.I think there's a big leap between species that cannot be accounted for. DNA doesn't evolve that easily.
Those are the basic three categories, inside which you will find myriad different views. I would call none of these theories though. They are not supported by evidence.
My personal belief is evolution within each species, but.I think there's a big leap between species that cannot be accounted for. DNA doesn't evolve that easily.
I personally believe that God created the natural world, holistically, that includes all natural processes including evolution and any others. The intent was to create what is and what has been and what will be. Time is simply one of those natural processes so its a part of what was created.
To me that is an example of one of the possible theories that falls under the title "intelligent design".
My personal belief is evolution within each species, but.I think there's a big leap between species that cannot be accounted for. DNA doesn't evolve that easily.
Bullshit, ID can be understood to mean that GOD created the natural and or unguided process that is evolution.
Nope. You are confusing ID with theistic evolution.
I personally believe that God created the natural world, holistically, that includes all natural processes including evolution and any others. The intent was to create what is and what has been and what will be. Time is simply one of those natural processes so its a part of what was created.
To me that is an example of one of the possible theories that falls under the title "intelligent design".
Which falls under the third example I gave as the basics.
That easily? The evolution from ape to human took millions of years. How is that 'easy'???
I disagree.
A new Pew Poll shows that only 43% of Republicans believe humans evolved as compared to 54% in 2009. Lack of education and religiosity tend to be the major reasons why.
Or maybe it's all those atheist ex-Democrats that have since abandoned your beloved Democrat Party.
Someone is confused. A few points to help... Now is later than 2009. 43% < 54%. And atheist are more likely to accept evolution.
No worries, pmp has trouble with concepts of order, math and understanding what atheists believe too.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-12-22/voters-political-parties/52171688/1A USA TODAY analysis of state voter registration statistics shows registered Democrats declined in 25 of the 28 states that register voters by party.
Someone is confused. A few points to help... Now is later than 2009. 43% < 54%. And atheist are more likely to accept evolution.
No worries, pmp has trouble with concepts of order, math and understanding what atheists believe too.
![]()
A new Pew Poll shows that only 43% of Republicans believe humans evolved as compared to 54% in 2009. Lack of education and religiosity tend to be the major reasons why.
The GOP...going backwards since 1980!
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/
Apparently it is you who are confused:
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-12-22/voters-political-parties/52171688/1
Apparently it is you who are confused:
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-12-22/voters-political-parties/52171688/1
It should be self-explanatory to you. If not, I'd suggest that you discuss this with someone willing to teach you logic and reason. That ain't me.What does that have to with the op or what you quoted and how does it justify your response?
I linked it, therefore left nothing out. But since you brought it up, 25>21. Can you follow that?Btw, as I figured, you left out the fact that Republicans declined in 21 of those states. None of this necessarily means a change of affiliation and could just be due to voter turnover.