A&E suspended Phil Robertson

So Leaningright and Supercandy both admit that because they did not agree with the Dixie Chicks they took the opposite side of this issue back when the DC's were banned for speaking out against GWB.

I'm calling that being a hypocrite based on political ideology, they will argue differently based on what issue the banned person is speaking about. Am I wrong? They are cool with banning someone if they disagree with that person, not cool with banning if they agree with the person.

Nice!


So Garud was indeed just trying to play a game of gotcha... just like we said.
 
No he did not; read and try to comprehend what he is saying without your “liberal dunce” filter.

His views about homosexuality suggest that if you accept it as "normal" behavior, it morphs into other "deviant" forms until there is little to distinguish between beasts and humans.



Are you a whack job prone to fantastic fabrications?



He himself does. But of course, you wouldn’t have done any research prior to engaging in your ignorant outbursts typical of leftist dimwits.



How is it self-righteous? I didn’t say I liked them BECAUSE they were gay you dunce; I said that just because I believe that gay behavior is aberrant, doesn’t preclude me from liking them.



Are consciously trying to remove all doubt what a complete and utter waste of time and a dunce you are?

How can anyone be as dumb as you and function?

You seem to fit the parameters for a male chauvinist pig--just an observation from all the expletives and tone of condensation you use towards women. I'll bet you are scared of us.
If homosexuals are accepted as 'normal people' then we should beware because their behavior will morph into the raping of animals. Any other way to say it?
 
You seem to fit the parameters for a male chauvinist pig--just an observation from all the expletives and tone of condensation you use towards women. I'll bet you are scared of us.
If homosexuals are accepted as 'normal people' then we should beware because their behavior will morph into the raping of animals. Any other way to say it?

There are already a whole discussion on this issue within this thread and how that's not what he meant but clearly you either didn't read it or have serious issues comprehending it. You might want to stick to rapping Partner Kiki.
 
They were still Democrats with a Democrat mentality. ;)

Of course you probably think it is some kind of switch one can just flick and it changes you from one ideology to the other.

You mean like a gay person flicking a switch and changing themselves into a heterosexual?
 
There are already a whole discussion on this issue within this thread and how that's not what he meant but clearly you either didn't read it or have serious issues comprehending it. You might want to stick to rapping Partner Kiki.

Your conclusions are not my conclusions. Has anyone ever told you no two snow flakes are alike?
 
The hypocrite.

That is why you are such a moronic douche... it is not hypocritical to stand up for what you believe in. My stance on the two issues was identical.

1) The Ditzie Chicks and Robertson had a right to say what they did
2) Clear Channel and A&E had a right to respond the way they did
3) Individuals had the right to support whichever side they felt was correct.

You are simply to moronic to comprehend that. You are so childish and desperate to try and find some 'gotcha' that you continually make a fool of yourself.
 
The side that only believes in freedom of speech and expression when the speech and expression support his side.

Which is simply a lie on your part. I have stated over and over again that I support the rights of each of the parties to have done what they did you douche bag.

Please... do go on making a fool of yourself.
 
That is why you are such a moronic douche... it is not hypocritical to stand up for what you believe in. My stance on the two issues was identical.

1) The Ditzie Chicks and Robertson had a right to say what they did
2) Clear Channel and A&E had a right to respond the way they did
3) Individuals had the right to support whichever side they felt was correct.

You are simply to moronic to comprehend that. You are so childish and desperate to try and find some 'gotcha' that you continually make a fool of yourself.

You are still trying to hide the fact that you supported what Clear Channel did and oppose what A&E did, simply based on whose political philosophy was being punished.
 
You are still trying to hide the fact that you supported what Clear Channel did and oppose what A&E did, simply based on whose political philosophy was being punished.

I am not hiding from anything you douchebag. You seem to think freedom of speech stops at some point. It does not.

1) The Ditzie Chicks and Robertson had a right to say what they did
2) Clear Channel and A&E had a right to respond the way they did <--- this is where you seem to think free speech ends
3) Individuals had the right to support whichever side they felt was correct. <--- this is where I get to make my opinion heard... you douche bag
 
You are still trying to hide the fact that you supported what Clear Channel did and oppose what A&E did, simply based on whose political philosophy was being punished.

How does his clearly stating that he supported Clear Channel's decision and why while not supporting A&E and why even get close to making this statement resemble something that has ever visited us in other than your imagination? How could he possibly be trying to "hide" something he clearly and directly stated in this thread?
 
Which is simply a lie on your part. I have stated over and over again that I support the rights of each of the parties to have done what they did you douche bag.

Please... do go on making a fool of yourself.

You are back to your silly bait and switch. We all agree both sides had a RIGHT to do what they did. You simply decry with what A&E did while having supported what Clear Channel did, which is simply being a hypocrite based on what team had your favorite color jersey.
 
Back
Top