A&E suspended Phil Robertson

However, I'm bothered by his sweeping generalization about the left. A lot of RWs here are the same.

...yet never bothered by leftists sweeping generalizations about the right. There's a word for this...starts with an "H" and ends with an "e". It is usually attributed to people described by a word that starts with a "D" and ends in an "e".
 
Oh you are telling me that some black people were treated better than others according to where they lived?

Yes, I am saying it is very likely.

Phil Robertson was an all-state in football, baseball and track in high school. Do you think his fans yelled, "Go white trash?"

I have no idea what was said at high school games back in the 60's to Phil Robertson. Do you?

When were blacks given the right to vote?
The 15th Amendment technically gave them that right... but the 24th Amendment/ Civil Rights act of 1964 eliminated a lot of the poll tax crap that was enacted to prevent poor voters (most blacks at the time) from voting.
 
No, and I would like to hear if he did. There were many folks in Kansas that treated blacks as equals, but there were also those that didn't.

I am glad your family accepted them.

I don't watch the show, do they have black friends?

the show doesn't focus on much except the family and the guys that work for them, which is family plus two other white guys... very rarely do you see them 'go into town'
 
Their contractors are white, friends, wives,radio announcer, are white, store clerks white!
Normal Louisiana
Not sure they have even shown a non white on the show
 
He doesn't like homosexuals because they don't like vaginas. If you think I took his quotation out of context, then finish it and interpret to fit your own belief.

What is with this idiots claim that he doesn't "like" homos? Where did he say he didn't "like" them. As a reformed white trash loser alchoholic, he doesn't like himself more than anyone. But to claim he doesn't "like" something because he believes it is sinful is beyond bizzarre and merely attests to the lunatic efforts to dehumanized the man and impugn him because he doesnt share the leftist mobs opinions about reality.

He indicates that it is a sin according to the bible and shares a personal opinion about it. I correctly believe that homosexuality is devient behavior, but it doesn't mean I don't like someone because they are gay.

Dunce.
 
OK Mr. Lawyer, I'll try again. But this is why I don't engage you often. You're lawyer speak gets tiresome. They are businesses and they can do whatever they wish with their employees, constituents or benefactors. You asked if I "support" them. If by that do you mean that I would do the same thing that they would do. Then then answer is different in each case. Yes, I'd have banned the Dixie Chicks and no I wouldn't have suspended Phil Robertson.

When I am asked if I support some action by a person or company to me it goes to the right of the person or company to do what they did. So I answered accordingly. I still say that you are trying to turn this thread into something other than what it is.

So, if you will condescend to discuss this with me a step further... Why did you support what Clear Channel did and don't support what A&E did?
 
What is with this idiots claim that he doesn't "like" homos? Where did he say he didn't "like" them. As a reformed white trash loser alchoholic, he doesn't like himself more than anyone. But to claim he doesn't "like" something because he believes it is sinful is beyond bizzarre and merely attests to the lunatic efforts to dehumanized the man and impugn him because he doesnt share the leftist mobs opinions about reality.

He indicates that it is a sin according to the bible and shares a personal opinion about it. I correctly believe that homosexuality is devient behavior, but it doesn't mean I don't like someone because they are gay.

Dunce.

He thinks homosexuality is a sin comparable to bestiality. Are you suggesting he likes animal rapists?
Who gave him the label of 'white trash loser alcoholic?'
You are mighty self-righteous to say you like someone despite the fact they are gay. Are you consciously trying to make the world a better place for THOSE people? You know, the sinful ones.
 
"It seems like, to me, a vagina — as a man — would be more desirable than a man's anus, that's just me," the reality star said.

"I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."

"Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there, bestiality,"

Wonder what he means by she's got more to offer?

Im thinking Tits.
 
He thinks homosexuality is a sin comparable to bestiality. Are you suggesting he likes animal rapists?
Who gave him the label of 'white trash loser alcoholic?'
You are mighty self-righteous to say you like someone despite the fact they are gay. Are you consciously trying to make the world a better place for THOSE people? You know, the sinful ones.

He also said drunkenness is a sin. Why aren't you upset at that? Why aren't you making the world a better place for the drunks?
 
1) Thank you for your apology.
2) Thank you for answering.

This is an important thing I want you to understand. I do not like what the Duck Dynasty guy said, I disagree with him, I think what he said is harmful to people. I DISAGREE with the COMMENTS he made!

YET, because I believe in FREEDOM and the FREE EXPRESSION OF IDEAS, I do not agree with what A&E did. I do not think Comcast should have banned the DIXIE CHICKS for criticizing the president, and I don't think A&E should have banned this guy for calling homosexuality a sin.


One of my wishes is for AMERICANS to rise above what they believe about the issues and stand on some bigger principals about being accepting of the right to disagree!

Im reposting because this was completely ignored.
 
So Leaningright and Supercandy both admit that because they did not agree with the Dixie Chicks they took the opposite side of this issue back when the DC's were banned for speaking out against GWB.

I'm calling that being a hypocrite based on political ideology, they will argue differently based on what issue the banned person is speaking about. Am I wrong? They are cool with banning someone if they disagree with that person, not cool with banning if they agree with the person.

Nice!
 
He also said drunkenness is a sin. Why aren't you upset at that? Why aren't you making the world a better place for the drunks?

Do you want to start a debate on drunkenness?
Are you upset?
If so, would you share with us how you feel about Noah and Job sleeping with their daughters while assumedly being in a state of drunkenness. I've always been a very inquisitive person. How does a drunk manage to have sex?
 
Do you want to start a debate on drunkenness?
Are you upset?
If so, would you share with us how you feel about Noah and Job sleeping with their daughters while assumedly being in a state of drunkenness. I've always been a very inquisitive person. How does a drunk manage to have sex?

I want to know why you single out only wanting to make the word a better place for queers? Queers weren't the only ones mentioned. Perhaps my question is too complicated for you.
 
He thinks homosexuality is a sin comparable to bestiality.

No he did not; read and try to comprehend what he is saying without your “liberal dunce” filter.

His views about homosexuality suggest that if you accept it as "normal" behavior, it morphs into other "deviant" forms until there is little to distinguish between beasts and humans.

Are you suggesting he likes animal rapists?

Are you a whack job prone to fantastic fabrications?

Who gave him the label of 'white trash loser alcoholic?'

He himself does. But of course, you wouldn’t have done any research prior to engaging in your ignorant outbursts typical of leftist dimwits.

You are mighty self-righteous to say you like someone despite the fact they are gay.

How is it self-righteous? I didn’t say I liked them BECAUSE they were gay you dunce; I said that just because I believe that gay behavior is aberrant, doesn’t preclude me from liking them.

Are you consciously trying to make the world a better place for THOSE people? You know, the sinful ones.

Are consciously trying to remove all doubt what a complete and utter waste of time and a dunce you are?

How can anyone be as dumb as you and function?
 
My grandparents were racists, they lived in Montgomery, AL. They liked black people, they believed in treating them well, they believed in loving them. They insisted when their maid died she be buried against the wall of the black cemetery so she could be as close to the white section as possible. They paid her well, they fed her and her family when they were hungry. They would not have stood by and seen them lynched. They would not have seen them mistreated.

They also though black people incapable of having an intellect much greater than that of a child. They compared them to monkeys. They felt they needed to be cared for and could not be expected to care for themselves. They wanted them to eat in separate dining rooms, they wanted them to go to separate schools and live in different areas of town. They felt that due to the vastly different mental capabilities of the races it was only appropriate to keep them separate.
 
My grandparents were racists, they lived in Montgomery, AL. They liked black people, they believed in treating them well, they believed in loving them. They insisted when their maid died she be buried against the wall of the black cemetery so she could be as close to the white section as possible. They paid her well, they fed her and her family when they were hungry. They would not have stood by and seen them lynched. They would not have seen them mistreated.

They also though black people incapable of having an intellect much greater than that of a child. They compared them to monkeys. They felt they needed to be cared for and could not be expected to care for themselves. They wanted them to eat in separate dining rooms, they wanted them to go to separate schools and live in different areas of town. They felt that due to the vastly different mental capabilities of the races it was only appropriate to keep them separate.

They sound like Democrats.
 
I want to know why you single out only wanting to make the word a better place for queers? Queers weren't the only ones mentioned. Perhaps my question is too complicated for you.

I was following the topic of homosexuality. Is that too complicated for you?
 
Back
Top