Another gun nut goes off the deep end...kills neighbors for being "mean"

The reality is that we have murderers in our society......murder will happen, with or without guns, with or without knives, with or without any other weapons
you can name.....people kill people, not things....thats as stupid as blaming the rope for someone getting hung....or blaming the match for the arson....


If background checks could prevent innocent guns from getting into the hands of crazy people, that would be a good thing, right?

Fewer crazy people with guns is a good thing, right?
 
And finally, when they can't logically argue their position any longer, the desperate resort to changing the subject by introducing facts that have NOTHING to do with the thread they are posting in.

You pretend that a few isolated incidents with guns somehow translates to the need to ban guns or increase gun laws/restrictions. You use the extreme cases because you are a fear mongering moron.
 
The reality is that we have murderers in our society......murder will happen, with or without guns, with or without knives, with or without any other weapons
you can name.....people kill people, not things....thats as stupid as blaming the rope for someone getting hung....or blaming the match for the arson....

Never said there weren't other ways to murder. But guns are easy and effective - even kids can use them to kill. THAT is the problem.
 
So when you're confronted by a nut threatening you and familys life, its your duty to run away.....yeah, thats real smart, real smart...

It's my DUTY to protect my family...if the best way to accomplish that is to run away, who are you to say otherwise?
 
You pretend that a few isolated incidents with guns somehow translates to the need to ban guns or increase gun laws/restrictions. You use the extreme cases because you are a fear mongering moron.


But it's NOT a "few isolated incidents".

And NOWHERE have I advocated banning guns.

Do you think maybe you could control your need to respond with hyperbole and for once stick to the facts?
 
That the SYG law is being used as a bullshit excuse by the cowardly and insane to kill whoever they perceive is being mean to them.
It's got to go, extremely crummy law.

It was sold on a pretense to the ....folks down here in Floriduh.

So a few hours later, Woodward snuck up on the three men and opened fire with a semiautomatic weapon. They didn’t assault him or approach him and they weren’t on his property. He simply decided that he’d had enough and “felt threatened” so he killed two men and tried to kill a third.
premeditation
 
Whats your point.....

suppose he would have murdered them by starting a fire to burn their house down ?

suppose he would have murdered them by running them over with his car ?

suppose he would have murdered them by bombing their house with TNT ?

suppose he would have murdered them by stabbing the whole family to death ?

WTF is your point ?

99 times out of 100 the murder occurs at the end of a gun barrel, I think thats his point.
 
Original sponsor of Florida’s stand your ground law ‘puzzled’ by ruliings

The original sponsor of Florida’s controversial stand your ground law is cautious about altering the self-defense statute, even though he admits it has led to some puzzling rulings.

Speaking with reporters before a meeting of the Capital City Republican Club in Tallahassee on Wednesday, state Rep. Dennis Baxley (R-Ocala) said he was “cautious” about proposals to amend Florida’s self-defense laws.
Baxley claimed that the stand your ground law — which allows a person who feels threatened to use deadly force without the requirement to first try to retreat — had made Florida a safer state. However, the lawmaker acknowledged that the self-defense statute had been used in court in dubious ways.

“I am puzzled by some of the rulings that I see and I think it’s more about application and context,” he told reporters. “We looked very much at the appropriate context, doing nothing unlawful in order to qualify for any kind of presumption about not being prosecuted and so I am puzzled by some of the rulings that have been made. I think they were more focused on just the climactic moment of interchange.”

During his speech to the Capital City Republican Club, Baxley said that the law didn’t apply to those who “pursue, confront, [and] provoke other people,” according to the Florida Current.

Florida’s stand your ground law came under scrutiny after George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager, in 2012. Baxley denied that the shooting had anything to do with the stand your ground law, and accused Democrats of manipulating the incident for political gain.

“The first person to say anything about elections was Al Sharpton. He said, ‘This is going to be the ’14 and ’16 elections.’ Well, all of a sudden, I noticed that President Obama went from ‘That could my son’ to ‘That could be me.’ There was a merging of images, and let us all, as Republicans, run against Trayvon Martin — the innocent young kid who was chased down by a white man and murdered. He knew good and well that narrative was false,”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/...das-stand-your-ground-law-puzzled-by-rulings/

now if this pasty faced bald old white guy is puzzled.....color me totaly perplexed and konfused

clik link to see the pasty face
 
You pretend that a few isolated incidents with guns somehow translates to the need to ban guns or increase gun laws/restrictions. You use the extreme cases because you are a fear mongering moron.
Supertool if 10,000 gun murders isn't enough, what is 10 million?
 
Back
Top