The FIX is On, Zimmerman Will Be Sacrificed to appease Obama's Peoples

No... these are all things that Mr. Martin ADMITTED TO or CONFESSED TO on his social Media Accounts.



Did he do drugs? Yes... He admitted it

Did he SELL DRUGS? Yes... His twitter feed showed that too.

Did he go by the self proclaimed handle of "NO LIMIT N*GGA" ?... Yes, that was his name on Twitter

Was he Flashing Gang Signs and acting all "GANGSTA"?... Yes, it was all over his Facebook page.

Did he have a criminal history? Yes he did. For both DRUGS and ASSAULT.


So please ...Show all of us how my mentioning specific aspects of Trayvon Martins lack of Moral character makes me Racist..

That is how HE chose to portray himself... Not me... This kid thought the rules of decent society did not apply to him.

He CHOSE his path and it led to his demise.

So watch out how you throw around the term Racist... Mr. Martin was the one that Assaulted People, did and sold drugs, portrayed himself as a Gangsta wannabe and attacked the wrong person.

Dont keep trying to sanitize this kids image... He was a Punk and a Druggie and a Violent Offender. All by his own admission.

You choose to ignore that though because it doesn't suit you agenda. If the kid had been white, yellow, brown, green or Purple I'd say the same thing.

And your use of personal attacks and profanity shows an extremely limited ability to debate... But I saw that from you months ago as I lurked here reading all this... Youre a known quantity....

BTW...I didn't mention this, because I just thought of it....Was Zimmerman's history of violence made available to the jury? After all...you want to use Martin's teenage ramblings on Social Media as proof of him being a thug....but braggadocio on Facebook isn't as real as Domestic violence, and attacking a law enforcement officer....not even regarding the same incident...but two separate incidents.
 
Doesnt matter.. Zimmerman wasnt doing anything illegal at that point. No law about sitting in a car watching someone.
.
unless they have a restraining order on you...

It was Martin who got aggressive and attacked Zimmerman... not the other way around..

Will you admit that Trayvon Martin attacked Mr Zimmerman?

Be honest now.....
 
Doesnt matter.. Zimmerman wasnt doing anything illegal at that point. No law about sitting in a car watching someone.
.
unless they have a restraining order on you...

It was Martin who got aggressive and attacked Zimmerman... not the other way around..

Will you admit that Trayvon Martin attacked Mr Zimmerman?

Be honest now.....

Martin wasn't doing anything illegal either....until Zimmerman followed him.
 
Here's the.law on provocation and.self defense

http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/self-defense-overview.html

Note the "duty to retreat" segment. Zimmerman was in his car....he had no reason to get out of it when TM was allegedly circling it. That was his opportunity for the.incident that occurred NOT TO HAPPEN.
'duty to retreat' is unconstitutional and denies effective self defense. It implies that people must bow down to criminal activity instead of standing fast where ever they have a right to be, therefore it's irrelevant.
 
BTW...I didn't mention this, because I just thought of it....Was Zimmerman's history of violence made available to the jury? After all...you want to use Martin's teenage ramblings on Social Media as proof of him being a thug....but braggadocio on Facebook isn't as real as Domestic violence, and attacking a law enforcement officer....not even regarding the same incident...but two separate incidents.

So ... show me Zimmermans history of violence... please.

Those convicted of Violent Crime can not be in possession of a Concealed Carry Permit in Florida....

Show me what you have.....
 
So ... show me Zimmermans history of violence... please.

Those convicted of Violent Crime can not be in possession of a Concealed Carry Permit in Florida....

Show me what you have.....
No, they cannot.

Queue the name-calling and hand-wringing as a diversion to answering.
 
Excellent observation Susie... They start the SYI's and the calling me a RACIST when they get cornered...

Funny how they never answer the question ....
 
'duty to retreat' is unconstitutional and denies effective self defense. It implies that people must bow down to criminal activity instead of standing fast where ever they have a right to be, therefore it's irrelevant.

What should be irrelevant is people with a dogmatic and hatefilled agenda who are going to end up hurting their own country and their own people by ratcheting up the racism.
 

laughable... he has NO VIOLENT CONVICTIONS. No Misdemeanors or Felonies and one was when he was 20 yo.

From your Article.


In 2005, Zimmerman, then 20, was arrested and charged with “resisting officer with violence” and “battery of law enforcement officer,” both which are third-degree felonies. The charge was reduced to “resisting officer without violence” and then waived when he entered an alcohol education program. Contemporaneous accounts indicate he shoved an officer who was questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking at an Orange County bar.

In August 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman counterfiled for a restraining order against Zuazo. The competing claims were resolved with both restraining orders being granted.

(obviously resolved because he still had his concealed carry. Both RO's had to have been dropped)

No Convictions = NO HISTORY
 
laughable... he has NO VIOLENT CONVICTIONS. No Misdemeanors or Felonies and one was when he was 20 yo.

From your Article.


In 2005, Zimmerman, then 20, was arrested and charged with “resisting officer with violence” and “battery of law enforcement officer,” both which are third-degree felonies. The charge was reduced to “resisting officer without violence” and then waived when he entered an alcohol education program. Contemporaneous accounts indicate he shoved an officer who was questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking at an Orange County bar.

In August 2005, Zimmerman’s ex-fiancee, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order alleging domestic violence. Zimmerman counterfiled for a restraining order against Zuazo. The competing claims were resolved with both restraining orders being granted.

(obviously resolved because he still had his concealed carry. Both RO's had to have been dropped)

No Convictions = NO HISTORY

I see...arrest records and.plea deals mean nothing.....but talk.on FACEBOOK....and you're a criminal.....hypocrite.
 
you didnt answer the question...

When does the Federal Government intervene when there was NO EVIDENCE of a Federal crime being committed and they were not called by the Local Authorities?

You're either being Naive or Willfully Ignorant. The first mention of anything racial in this case was in the Media.

And we know who they work for.

You sit here and defend this drug dealing, gang banging, violent kid like he is some sort of angel.

and you will argue that a man with No criminal record went out of his way to intentionally murder him. With a LEGAL FIREARM.

Face it... Trayvon Martin was killed because the self proclaimed "No Limit N*gga" didn't realize his own limits to make rational and lawful decisions.

This crime was not Racial... Yet the Media portrayed it as such and continues to back it's assertions. They proclaimed Mr. Zimmerman to be WHITE when he is Hispanic, They portray Martin as an innocent 12yo when he was 17 with a pretty good size criminal record..

You really are discarding facts for partisan position... that is VERY intellectually dishonest.

The kid didn't deserve to die, but his death wasn't criminal and the prosecution didn't prove it's case...

The Jury will see it that way as well..

Sorry, pal, you lose. I asked you hours ago to cite evidence of your claim that the state was PRESSURED to charge GZ and you came up with a big, fat goose egg.

Then you write this tripe that TM has "... a pretty good size criminal record." and that is a bald-faced lie.

"... on Monday, authorities confirmed to the Associated Press that Martin did not have a juvenile offender record."

Followed by more tripe that GZ is "a man with no criminal record" when the truth is he had several brushes with the law and they've been documented.

"In 2005, Zimmerman was arrested and charged with "resisting officer with violence" and "battery of law enforcement officer." Both these felonies are considered third-degree. Due to his desperate attempts, the charges were reduced to "resisting officer without violence" and then the only remaining charge was also completely waived off when he entered an alcohol education program.

In the same year (2005), Zimmerman's ex-fiance, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order, alleging domestic violence. In retaliation, Zimmerman filed for a retraining order against Zuazo and both these claims were resolved with both restraining orders granted.

The next year, in 2006, Zimmerman was charged with speeding. However, that case was dismissed because the officer who charged him failed to show up at the court."

Then you wrote that TM was "...drug dealing ... violent kid like he is some sort of angel."

TM was suspended from school once after being accused of stealing jewelry; however, no evidence of theft was found after investigation by Miami police. "At that time, the Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD) was contacted by Miami-Dade Schools Police Department (MDSPD) to assist in identifying property found in Trayvon Martin’s possession. Our records yielded negative results and MDSPD was advised of such findings."

Then TM was suspended after "he was caught with the empty baggie with traces of marijuana in it, the report said. A "marijuana pipe" was also found on the teen, the report said." Carrying marijuana isn't the same as dealing so unless you can cite proof from a reliable source (i.e. not Rush, Glenn or their ilk), I'll have to call this another bald-faced lie.

Furthermore, you've chosen to ignore that GZ was such a heavy drinker he had to enter an alcohol education program in 2005, yet no drug or alcohol test was performed on him after the killing. And GZ and his then fiancee were granted restraining orders on each other for domestic violence, another fact you've chosen to ignore while painting TM as a violent thug.

Finally, I never said the case was racial. Your reading comprehension needs work. I said the city of Sanford, FL had racial tensions dating back a decades and that is historical fact. The actual founder of Sanford was a racist with ideas of shipping all American blacks back to Congo.

Less than 10 years ago "...two private security guards—one the son of a Sanford police officer, the other a volunteer for the department—killed a black teen with a gunshot in his back. Even though they admitted to never identifying themselves, the guards were released without charges. Then, in 2010, Justin Collison, the son of a Sanford PD lieutenant, sucker-punched a homeless black man outside a bar, and officers on the scene released Collison without charges. He eventually surrendered after video of the incident materialized online; the police chief at the time was ultimately forced into retirement." Sanford's sordid racism is linked here: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/trayvon-martin-sanford-racial-history

Here's a newsflash. Racist crimes are Federal crimes. Hate crime laws have been part of American history for over 120 years. Sanford's past and present record of hate crimes made it the focus of the feds more than once. There's a remedy for this, the citizens of Sanford have to give up their prejudices once and for all.

You may be correct that GZ will win this case but IMO it'll be an empty victory. GZ still has to look in the mirror every single day and remember that he took away a human life. He'll be in a hell of his own making but that's all right with me.
 
Sorry, pal, you lose. I asked you hours ago to cite evidence of your claim that the state was PRESSURED to charge GZ and you came up with a big, fat goose egg.

Then you write this tripe that TM has "... a pretty good size criminal record." and that is a bald-faced lie.

"... on Monday, authorities confirmed to the Associated Press that Martin did not have a juvenile offender record."

Followed by more tripe that GZ is "a man with no criminal record" when the truth is he had several brushes with the law and they've been documented.

"In 2005, Zimmerman was arrested and charged with "resisting officer with violence" and "battery of law enforcement officer." Both these felonies are considered third-degree. Due to his desperate attempts, the charges were reduced to "resisting officer without violence" and then the only remaining charge was also completely waived off when he entered an alcohol education program.

In the same year (2005), Zimmerman's ex-fiance, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order, alleging domestic violence. In retaliation, Zimmerman filed for a retraining order against Zuazo and both these claims were resolved with both restraining orders granted.

The next year, in 2006, Zimmerman was charged with speeding. However, that case was dismissed because the officer who charged him failed to show up at the court."

Then you wrote that TM was "...drug dealing ... violent kid like he is some sort of angel."

TM was suspended from school once after being accused of stealing jewelry; however, no evidence of theft was found after investigation by Miami police. "At that time, the Miami-Dade Police Department (MDPD) was contacted by Miami-Dade Schools Police Department (MDSPD) to assist in identifying property found in Trayvon Martin’s possession. Our records yielded negative results and MDSPD was advised of such findings."

Then TM was suspended after "he was caught with the empty baggie with traces of marijuana in it, the report said. A "marijuana pipe" was also found on the teen, the report said." Carrying marijuana isn't the same as dealing so unless you can cite proof from a reliable source (i.e. not Rush, Glenn or their ilk), I'll have to call this another bald-faced lie.

Furthermore, you've chosen to ignore that GZ was such a heavy drinker he had to enter an alcohol education program in 2005, yet no drug or alcohol test was performed on him after the killing. And GZ and his then fiancee were granted restraining orders on each other for domestic violence, another fact you've chosen to ignore while painting TM as a violent thug.

Finally, I never said the case was racial. Your reading comprehension needs work. I said the city of Sanford, FL had racial tensions dating back a decades and that is historical fact. The actual founder of Sanford was a racist with ideas of shipping all American blacks back to Congo.

Less than 10 years ago "...two private security guards—one the son of a Sanford police officer, the other a volunteer for the department—killed a black teen with a gunshot in his back. Even though they admitted to never identifying themselves, the guards were released without charges. Then, in 2010, Justin Collison, the son of a Sanford PD lieutenant, sucker-punched a homeless black man outside a bar, and officers on the scene released Collison without charges. He eventually surrendered after video of the incident materialized online; the police chief at the time was ultimately forced into retirement." Sanford's sordid racism is linked here: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/trayvon-martin-sanford-racial-history

Here's a newsflash. Racist crimes are Federal crimes. Hate crime laws have been part of American history for over 120 years. Sanford's past and present record of hate crimes made it the focus of the feds more than once. There's a remedy for this, the citizens of Sanford have to give up their prejudices once and for all.

You may be correct that GZ will win this case but IMO it'll be an empty victory. GZ still has to look in the mirror every single day and remember that he took away a human life. He'll be in a hell of his own making but that's all right with me.

The restraining orders issued to GZ and his ex Fiancee were for ALLEGED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. IT WAS NEVER PROVEN OR CONFIRMED TO HAVE OCCURRED.

The Charge in 2005 resulted in the Charges being reduced to "resisting officer without violence" and then the only remaining charge was also completely waived off when he entered an alcohol education program.

end result... Alcohol treatment Program and NO CONVICTION for any crime...

Show me a Conviction....
 
Back
Top