IRS scandal & Benghazi... how many other cover ups are out there?

blackascoal said:
You already did .. and he countered.

End of story .. readers will make up their own minds about who is more honest.
Click to expand...

Where did he counter? He aint got nothing and Im going to illustrate to any and all readers here what a silly fool he is.

Would you like to stand in his place, cuz Im itching for an honest debate on this topic... but nobody will engage me.

Tell me where there is any evidence of cover-ups...
 
Jarod said:
Where did he counter? He aint got nothing and Im going to illustrate to any and all readers here what a silly fool he is.

Would you like to stand in his place, cuz Im itching for an honest debate on this topic... but nobody will engage me.

Tell me where there is any evidence of cover-ups...
Click to expand...

So yet another poster informs you that the information is there, yet you continue to pretend it is not. Either you are a liar or every bit the retard that I say you are. You can tell us which one is correct.

You have no desire for an honest debate as you claim.
 
Superfreak said:
So yet another poster informs you that the information is there, yet you continue to pretend it is not. Either you are a liar or every bit the retard that I say you are. You can tell us which one is correct.

You have no desire for an honest debate as you claim.
Click to expand...

Who said the information is there.
 
Jarod said:
You are just making shit up right and left arnt you?

Well, if lying to yourself makes you feel better!!!
Click to expand...

Did you not just respond to BAC's post where he stated I countered you? Perhaps you don't understand what that means? If you need us to dumb it down to your level, just say so. Or is it that you already know that it is there and you are being a lying pos?
 
Jarod said:
Where did he counter? He aint got nothing and Im going to illustrate to any and all readers here what a silly fool he is.

Would you like to stand in his place, cuz Im itching for an honest debate on this topic... but nobody will engage me.

Tell me where there is any evidence of cover-ups...
Click to expand...

YES .. by all means .. I'd like to stand in his place.

We will disagree, but the conversation will be civil.

You're missing my point.

You have already pointed out everything that you can point out. Continuing down this line is beneath you.

You're right .. many democrats won't back up claims or answer questions .. but you aren't guilty of that .. which makes my point. You are capable of serious and intelligent discussion .. this demeans you.

I say this to as your as your brother.
 
Superfreak said:
LOL... what was the time frame of the emails being released and the public being made aware of the changes to the talking points on Benghazi?

As for the IRS... they knew back in 2011 what was occurring. Yet we are just now getting confirmation? Funny how that happened AFTER the Presidential elections and in the year prior to the mid terms. 'Let's come clean now because Obama has already been re-elected and we can count on the public's short term memory to not care about it in 2014'.
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
It is the timing... they knew in 2011 this was happening. Yet we find out in 2013? Conveniently AFTER the Presidential elections. You think that would have been the case had Bush been in office?
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
Cover up? Where?
Click to expand...


These are three successive posts... 8/9/10 on this thread...

The above is precisely what I am talking about Garud. I stated my point, you then come back immediately with 'what you talking about'? You made no effort to discuss. You then went on post after post as if nothing was said, You also stated that you had read the thread, which is hard to fathom given you didn't seem to have made it to post 8.
 
blackascoal said:
YES .. by all means .. I'd like to stand in his place.

We will disagree, but the conversation will be civil.

You're missing my point.

You have already pointed out everything that you can point out. Continuing down this line is beneath you.

You're right .. many democrats won't back up claims or answer questions .. but you aren't guilty of that .. which makes my point. You are capable of serious and intelligent discussion .. this demeans you.

I say this to as your as your brother.
Click to expand...

Maybe you are correct. Thanks for your input. I just get so frustrated when people lie with impunity and then refuse to respond with honest discussion.
 
Superfreak said:
These are three successive posts... 8/9/10 on this thread...

The above is precisely what I am talking about Garud. I stated my point, you then come back immediately with 'what you talking about'? You made no effort to discuss. You then went on post after post as if nothing was said, You also stated that you had read the thread, which is hard to fathom given you didn't seem to have made it to post 8.
Click to expand...

So, you have responded that there was ONE cover up at the IRS, yet have said nothing about the President being involved in this cover-up... and your only reason for calling it a cover-up is because those who perpetrated the alleged act did not tell on themselves, that's not a cover-up.

A cover-up required someone hide something or lie about it when asked. Your entire claim about Cover-ups is simply based on the IRS not calling attention to it?

I can see why you did not want to engage in an honest debate... unless you have something more? Do you?
 
Superfreak said:
It is the timing... they knew in 2011 this was happening. Yet we find out in 2013? Conveniently AFTER the Presidential elections. You think that would have been the case had Bush been in office?
Click to expand...

Who are the They in your above post?
 
Jarod said:
So, you have responded that there was ONE cover up at the IRS, yet have said nothing about the President being involved in this cover-up... and your only reason for calling it a cover-up is because those who perpetrated the alleged act did not tell on themselves, that's not a cover-up.

A cover-up required someone hide something or lie about it when asked. Your entire claim about Cover-ups is simply based on the IRS not calling attention to it?

I can see why you did not want to engage in an honest debate... unless you have something more? Do you?
Click to expand...

You seriously should actually read up on what is occurring before posting.

1) The IRS was indeed a cover up. They knew back in 2012, they were asked about it in 2012 AFTER finding out. They lied.
2) Benghazi... we know the CIA's original talking points were altered. They tried to cover up that fact until it broke open on them and they couldn't contain it.


Both of those they delayed the truth coming out... conveniently until after the election.
 
Superfreak said:
You seriously should actually read up on what is occurring before posting.

1) The IRS was indeed a cover up. They knew back in 2012, they were asked about it in 2012 AFTER finding out. They lied.
2) Benghazi... we know the CIA's original talking points were altered. They tried to cover up that fact until it broke open on them and they couldn't contain it.


Both of those they delayed the truth coming out... conveniently until after the election.
Click to expand...

1) Give me the quote where the IRS lied.
2) The CIA's talking points were barely edited, which is a normal process for any and all talking points (hardly a cover-up) and the President called it a terrorist attack before that even happened.

Still no cover-up.

Now, see how easy this has been, instead of obfuscating and trying to avoid the discussion, next time just respond and allow an honest discussion. Sure you were shown to be grasping at straws and to not have much,,, but its better than running from it for three or four days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top