Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and P

Yes, plenty have. That YOU specifically have not, is anecdotal in the extreme. Further, even if the majority in your ilk do not, there is a minority that do, and you ENABLE future abuses on rights by them.


Tough shit.

I've tried and I've tried and I've tried to engage you guys in rational discussion and all I ever get in response is the same shrieking wail of fear claiming we want to take all your guns and if you are going to stonewall and black any kind of meaningful reform then I and others have no choice but to side with those calling for more extreme measures.

At least they are willing to sit down and listen to what we have to say...your stubborn refusal to work for meaningful compromise is what gives voices calling for more extreme measures the power it has.
 
Tough shit.

I've tried and I've tried and I've tried to engage you guys in rational discussion and all I ever get in response is the same shrieking wail of fear claiming we want to take all your guns and if you are going to stonewall and black any kind of meaningful reform then I and others have no choice but to side with those calling for more extreme measures.

magnets in ceilings is NOT rational discussion, moron.
 
magnets in ceilings is NOT rational discussion, moron.


And here comes the derision once again!

No, "magnets in ceilings" was merely a guy trying to spitball some ideas off the top of his head and naively hoping those more knowledgeable about guns might be able to offer some advice/critique.

Of course I was a fool to expect meaningful discourse from you gun worshipping fear mongers.
 
Last edited:
because the ATF would NEVER shoot kids and mothers holding babies.


They might if the women and kids were dumb enough to shoot first at US Marshalls and then hole up in a heavily armed compound with known criminals wanted by the authorities.

They were there to be used as human shields by the oh-so-brave gun nuts hiding in that compound.
 
And here comes the derision once again!

No, "magnets in ceilings" was merely a guy trying to spitball some ideas off the top of his head and naively hoping those more knowledgeable about guns might be able to offer some advice/critique.

Of course I was a fool to expect meaningful discourse from you gun worshipping fear mongers.
no, you were a fool to continue that line of 'meaningful discourse' when you told why it wouldn't work and resorted to your own derision.
 
They might if the women and kids were dumb enough to shoot first at US Marshalls and then hole up in a heavily armed compound with known criminals wanted by the authorities.

They were there to be used as human shields by the oh-so-brave gun nuts hiding in that compound.
your revisionist history makes you a fucktard, but then i know that nobody is going to change your mind about your beloved police state.
 
your revisionist history makes you a fucktard, but then i know that nobody is going to change your mind about your beloved police state.


Well one thing is certain.

You and you're ridiculous overblown rhetoric and hysterical hyperbole sure aren't going to change my mind.
 
Tough shit.

I've tried and I've tried and I've tried to engage you guys in rational discussion and all I ever get in response is the same shrieking wail of fear claiming we want to take all your guns and if you are going to stonewall and black any kind of meaningful reform then I and others have no choice but to side with those calling for more extreme measures.

At least they are willing to sit down and listen to what we have to say...your stubborn refusal to work for meaningful compromise is what gives voices calling for more extreme measures the power it has.

What you have to say is meaningless. You are not qualified to contribute to the discussion. Just like you're not qualified to have a valid opinion on motor design with exotic metals. You are arguing with experts and your arguments are based solely on emotion. So why should we listen to you when you don't know what you're talking about to begin with?
 
What you have to say is meaningless. You are not qualified to contribute to the discussion. Just like you're not qualified to have a valid opinion on motor design with exotic metals. You are arguing with experts and your arguments are based solely on emotion. So why should we listen to you when you don't know what you're talking about to begin with?


Well hey, if you say so then I guess I'll just stand quietly over here while you "experts" discuss the topic...ROTFLMAO!!

Once again we see that all anyone on the Right has in the way of rebuttal is the same tired need to belittle others.

I got news for ya...I am arguing with SELF PROCLAIMED "experts"...and to date you've done NOTHING to prove you actually ARE an "expert" when it comes to the field we are discussing.

So the gun nut has a lot of guns...BIG WHOOP! All that proves is you're REALLY scared and surrounding yourself with you surrogate penes make you feel secure.
 
The 9th and 10th refer to things that are actually real. Hence, birth control would be covered. Marriage is what it is, and means what it means. The 9th doesn't apply to imaginary and make-believe things that are literal contradictions such as gay (meaning homosexual) marriage (meaning husband and wife).

Please point me to something that explains this in more detail, thanks. Putting your words in google didn't help me.
 
Well then, when do you plan on dropping your fixation on the disproven claim that those of us that want better regulation are coming for all your guns?

We can't have an honest discussion until you admit that position is just more fear mongering that allows you to cloud the issue.

I always wonder who is the phantom liberal poster that called for all guns to be banned, and/or the repeal of the 2nd amendment.
 
Back
Top