Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and P

P3NvHc5.png

fizqsMq.png

chrO10u.jpg
 

If your brain is so twisted that you even WANT a device designed for taking the life of a fellow human or a wild animal then it is YOU who should be banned.
Honestly we normally endowed non americans dont give a shit about your small dicks and long compensatory guns. You have what you have. Live with it.
 
If you can't see what's wrong with these pictures, you are not qualified to make arguments about guns.

You have mistaken me for someone who gives a shit. They are either guns or they look like guns. They are designed to take life and even if they are designed for tsrget shooting that is simply a substitute for the real thing. The person who tries to justify ownership of either is bat shit crazy and a clear danger to his fellow man. To tr to challenge me about different tupes of killing device shows you to be exactly as I have said.
There. Can. Be. No. Argument.
If you want a gun you should be locked up for your safety and the safety of everyone.
 
You have mistaken me for someone who gives a shit. They are either guns or they look like guns. They are designed to take life and even if they are designed for tsrget shooting that is simply a substitute for the real thing. The person who tries to justify ownership of either is bat shit crazy and a clear danger to his fellow man. To tr to challenge me about different tupes of killing device shows you to be exactly as I have said.
There. Can. Be. No. Argument.
If you want a gun you should be locked up for your safety and the safety of everyone.

thankfully fascists like you will never have a voice. even extremist gun grabbers don't have your horrible treasonous slave supporting views.
 
Only less evolved, ignorant proles would live outside of the US when they have the option. Such individuals are not worth my time, as they believe it to be acceptable to live in a less developed and cultured nation. All they do is perpetuate mediocre and even failed nation states, which places the world in danger and millions of lives at risk. Low is just an ignorant barbarian.

I could make the same type of argument about where one should buy their pizza or clothing, or even what sort of vehicle they should propel themselves around in. He goes with the manner in which one chooses to live a secure lifestyle. Guns, gated communities, etc. - it's all valid material for argument until you resort to the whole, "your way is less sophisticated and even murderous, psychotic, and barbaric" line of fallacy.
 
thankfully fascists like you will never have a voice. even extremist gun grabbers don't have your horrible treasonous slave supporting views.

Now I am a fascist? OK. I do wish you would make up what passes for a mind. I'm a liberal (good thing), I'm a socialist (excellent thing), I'm a communist (not so good), I live in China, I am close to Pyongyang (a couple of years ago), I live in Hong Kong, Japan (also a year or two ago.
Please make up your mind. I dont give a shit where you live and I dont give a shit for your politics. Where you live (the US) and your politics (right wing) are both choices that I would never make.
So go and buy your little bang-bangs and just shoot each other and we'll all be free of your stupidity.
 
If you're going to be pedantic, where does it say "the right to keep 30-round magazines, etc."?

Keep your guns, you just can't have ammo.
this is where you end up failing. the constitution and the bill of rights does not limit your rights, it limits the government. looking at it in any other way puts you in the lose column.
 
If your brain is so twisted that you even WANT a device designed for taking the life of a fellow human or a wild animal then it is YOU who should be banned.
Honestly we normally endowed non americans dont give a shit about your small dicks and long compensatory guns. You have what you have. Live with it.
you lose credibility every time you comment about penis size.
 
You have mistaken me for someone who gives a shit. They are either guns or they look like guns. They are designed to take life and even if they are designed for tsrget shooting that is simply a substitute for the real thing. The person who tries to justify ownership of either is bat shit crazy and a clear danger to his fellow man. To tr to challenge me about different tupes of killing device shows you to be exactly as I have said.
There. Can. Be. No. Argument.
If you want a gun you should be locked up for your safety and the safety of everyone.
when you start advocating for removing guns from all governments, we can consider the validity of your position.
 
I went to the SF Giants opening day today. Started drinking at 10:00am Friday morning. It is now 12:44am Saturday morning. I'm not sure if I should be happy I've drinken for over 12 hours straight and can somewhat still continue to type. I'm suppose to get up in a few hours and play golf. I think I may really hurt. I have issues. As the wife would say "bless your heart".

If I get a chance I would like to clarify what I was attempting to say in that one post. I don't think it came across real well.

Cawacko what are you doing to yourself? You are going to destroy your liver. You should start smoking pot if you have to avoid reality this often. Which appears to be every day? This is no good, drinking like this.

As for not coming across well, your post basically seemed to say that men bone a certain way during a one night stand, which is to day, they get drunk, climb on, and we know the rest. That they make no attempt to give pleasure. And then pass out I guess. And then you said you had a lot of one night stands. I mean, it doesn't exactly take a mensa to connect these dots you see? And I'm really not sure what that post had to do with tinfoil calling a girl he slept with a slut in the first place, so if you do clarify, please also clarify that point. Though, i will understand if you don't clarify any of this. lol
 
how do you feel about pro-lifers talking about what you can do with your own body?

gun rights are very similar in a lot of respects, because guns allow people to protect their bodies from harm. They ensure the individuals freedom and help people maintain agency over themselves.

Why the fuck would I not be mad when christie keeps coming into threads making obviously disingenuous arguments and is being deliberately obtuse?

She smugly says we can have guns, just not ammo. What purpose does that serve in this conversation? Does she truly believe such an argument is an honest one, one that doesn't violate the spirit of the second amendment? Do I really have to explain why such an insinuation is absurd?

Then she claims we can have musketballs to protect ourselves, as if the 2nd amendment was only meant to be about 18th century weapons and nothing else.

So yeah, in addition to all the valid reasons to have guns, I take issue with christies continual obtuse and disingenuous debate tactics.

Lighten up, buddy. What's crystal clear is your total inability to recognize facetiousness when you see it. Stop taking yourself so seriously. The world will continue turning on its axis long after you gun nuts are kicking up daisies.
 
Lighten up, buddy. What's crystal clear is your total inability to recognize facetiousness when you see it. Stop taking yourself so seriously. The world will continue turning on its axis long after you gun nuts are kicking up daisies.

I thought you were being facetious, but I got bored by the 20 long-winded poutraged replies you inspired, and then Billy stopped applying ointment long enough to post pictures, and I just started skipping over everything other than cawacko's posts on this thread.
 
when you start advocating for removing guns from all governments, we can consider the validity of your position.

Governments are armed primarily to protect their citizens and to go to war on their behalf. The argument is not about emasculating your, or anybody's armed services, it is about stopping americans killing americans.
That may be a bit above you, but I am sure you might have access to a school teacher or even a pupil who could explain it to you.
It is so boring when braindeads keep churning such sentiments as yours out.
'Oh ahm not gonna give up mah weapons until they take the gurns from the government agencies.'
And then, without taking a breath:
'Nook North Korea. Nook Eye-ran. Nook Canada. Kill all commies.'
Even you, and I really am being as charitable as I can, even you must see the stupidity of what you THINK is your argument.
 
Lighten up, buddy. What's crystal clear is your total inability to recognize facetiousness when you see it. Stop taking yourself so seriously. The world will continue turning on its axis long after you gun nuts are kicking up daisies.

In defense, he seems to'get' my facetiousness far better than others.
 
i see you dodged your poorly placed logic.

as for your new post, musket balls actually have less accuracy than modern day bullets, so musket balls would in fact be more dangerous. secondly it's clear that the 2nd amendment was in place to prevent tyranny, and to act as a defense for ones own agency. that could not be accomplished today with musketballs.

sorry christie, but you are just a constitutional traitor. move to canada and get the fuck out.


:lolup: It's just too easy to get you guys frothing at the mouth over gun posts. But I suppose I could do it from a computer in Canada. I'll take your suggestion under advisement, lol.
 
guns are one of the most important issues in america. They protect our freedom from tyranny, and on a personal level can make a 80 year old grandma more powerful than some thug. They are the protectors of agency.

If you don't mind guns so long as they aren't used on innocents, why are you trying to punish the vast majority of gun owners that are responsible citizens?

You have a point. I considered getting a gun, going to N. Dakota and blowing away their legislature after the recent abortion restrictions. It's tyranny, pure and simple.
 
Back
Top