christiefan915
Catalyst
Ken hates America, what else is new?
In what universe does support for gun restrictions translate to hating America?
Ken hates America, what else is new?
Would it be more acceptable if it was nine faces? Because that's essentially what Connecticut is saying, 27 deaths is unnacceptable, but nine is ok. They should either try to make a substantive change, or just admit that they're posturing.
as have Ihave you read the federalist and anti federalist papers? i have
which part? remember, slaves were not considered people, but property.the bit about slavery was a compromise between the northern and southern delegate
and?the exclusion women was uncontested
agreed, so why do people continue pushing to have a court reinterpret instead of amend?and no, the founding fathers were not gods, they did the best that they could to establish as free a nation as they could
that is why they put in the part about amending the constitution and we needed it and still do
and that is exactly what the constitution was designed to prevent, from moving too fast and ending up with less freedom.social change is happening faster than a lot of people are comfortable with and accelerating
maybe we will end up with more freedom, but i fear that we may end up with less
what you posted was indicative of the founders trying to create a feudalism while telling 'we the people' that we're really a republic. that's just not the case.would you please elaborate on what you thought i said
this one. 'shall not be infringed' means exactly that. any attempt to limit the ability of the people to maintain control of our free state is hating america.In what universe does support for gun restrictions translate to hating America?
this one. 'shall not be infringed' means exactly that. any attempt to limit the ability of the people to maintain control of our free state is hating america.
Then why stop at nine?
We all would... but banning inanimate objects does nothing to reduce the number of psychos out there. Nothing. As Billy said, this is all for show.
Nobody said nine is okay, just that they reached the tipping point when those innocent babies were slaughtered. And I'm pretty sure that's how a lot of change happens, one too many tragedies/accidents/horrific events and people finally say enough is enough.
I said nothing about guns, but all the nutter still have to attack, carry on.
Jeebus, you guys are all morons. I made a statement that seeing the young faces makes me cry. I did not say anything about guns, nothing, nor did I comment on the legislation. I simply made a comment about seeing those little faces and knowing they are now dead. It still makes me cry because it is such a travesty.
It is still a travesty and it still effects me because I am just that type of person who has worked with children my whole life and I am compassionate.
It is all I intended. It wasn't to make anyone feel guilty about their stupid guns, but anyone who looks at those faces and doesn't feel emotion, well, there is something missing in your make up and I feel sorry for you.
In what universe does support for gun restrictions translate to hating America?
Nobody said nine is okay, just that they reached the tipping point when those innocent babies were slaughtered. And I'm pretty sure that's how a lot of change happens, one too many tragedies/accidents/horrific events and people finally say enough is enough.
Apparently it was only enough to look like they did something, not enough to actually do something. Which proves what I've said all along. You guys don't care about the dead. You just want to look like you do. The only thing prevented by this law is law abiding people exercising their rights to do perfectly harmless and legal things. What a great thing to prevent. You should all make a toast, something like "on the backs of these dead children, we will punish those who harmed no one and had no intention of doing so. We have stopped nothing and are proud of it!"
no it's not. prove it wrong.Nope, fallacious. Try again.