I'll be damned...the most brutal of the Delhi gang rapists is Muslim.

Rationalist

Hail Voltaire
It has come out that the 6th accused in the violent Delhi gang rape is a Muslim. Unsurprisingly, 17-year-old Mohammed Afroz was also the most brutal of the group. The youth raped the victim twice, including with an iron rod, and pulled out part of the victim's intestines with his bare hands.

The war on women is very real. However, the words of a few right-wing US politicians pale in comparison to the actions of radical Muslim men around the world. Hatred and oppression of women is the foundation of their religion.

Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that all Muslim men are pigs. But I would suggest that a disproportionate number of them are pigs, when compared to men of other religions. Of all the major religions, Islam is most hostile toward women, and I don't think any sane person would deny that.
 
Last edited:
it wasnt their religion that raped anyone.

There are evil people in all belief systems.


Especially ones that have no basis in fact and have doctrine they call infalable that degrades other human beings.


Have you read some of the crap in the bible?
 
All myth based religions can be distorted for evil purposes.

You must have "faith" is what thinking people are told when they point out these religions are based on no facts.


Why MUST anyone just believe fatasy to accept a belief system?


That makes NO sense
 
it wasnt their religion that raped anyone.

There are evil people in all belief systems.


Especially ones that have no basis in fact and have doctrine they call infalable that degrades other human beings.


Have you read some of the crap in the bible?

Yes, in fact, you may be surprised to know that I think the Bible is worse than the Quran in many respects. I've read most of both books. But on the other hand, you won't find many Jews or Christians acting out on it. My craziest Christian friends and relatives believe women don't belong in the workplace. But they don't believe it is acceptable to beat a woman, or that women are their "property."
 
then who is it that is beating women in America?

Mostly Christians, I assume, since the majority of the country identifies themselves as Christian. I'm not saying Christians are never violent. But unlike Islam, violence is not a pillar of their religion. Muslim men are violent because violence is sanctioned by their religion. It is how their prophet lived his life, and they are following his example.
 
[h=2]The Following User Groans At christiefan915 For This Awful Post: Melos (Today) [/h]You are truly pathetic, using this tragedy to further your agenda. And then you guys wonder why the women here get so upset when rape is the topic.
 
Mostly Christians, I assume, since the majority of the country identifies themselves as Christian. I'm not saying Christians are never violent. But unlike Islam, violence is not a pillar of their religion. Muslim men are violent because violence is sanctioned by their religion. It is how their prophet lived his life, and they are following his example.

Ignorance in full, florid display.
 
all god based religion is historically violent.

That is what happens when you organize a belief system arround myths.

when you organize arround " just trust me" I know what jesus and god meant you get people to place a leash arround their necks for some asshole to lead them arround by.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism


Under beliefs systems like this at least the the Fuck at the top has to provide you with facts to PROVE their ascertions.


FACTS NOT FAITH
 
[h=2]The Following User Groans At christiefan915 For This Awful Post: Melos (Today) [/h]You are truly pathetic, using this tragedy to further your agenda. And then you guys wonder why the women here get so upset when rape is the topic.

And yet, it seems the only one defending the religion of rape is you, Christiefan. As far as I can tell, you're the only person on this forum that will actually go out of their way (even pulling up bullshit sources, like pro-Islamic websites) to defend that sickening, backward religion responsible for more harm toward women than any other religion or ideology in the modern world. If people like you would simply accept that there is a problem, perhaps there is something that could be done about it, such as education programs geared toward integrating Muslim men into western society. But instead, people like you choose to ignore the problem, to your own peril.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/opinion/murray-violence-against-women-act/index.html



This week, just over 250 days since the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan and inclusive bill to extend the landmark Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives allowed the clock to run out on protections that bill would have provided to millions of women across our country.

It was an inexcusable failure by House Republican leaders and one that will have real-life implications for women who now find themselves with nowhere to turn for help. It was also another reminder, coming on the same day that House Republican leaders refused to pass aid to states ravaged by Superstorm Sandy, that these leaders continue to answer to the most radical elements of their party regardless of who or what is at stake.
 
There have been dozens of rape stories and a culture of ignoring them, coming out of India recently. The opposition comes primarily from those who have rejected faith of all types and have instead embraced science and reason. It has nothing to do with Islam. It appears you are simply trying to convince women that they need the protection of Christian fundies.
 
And yet, it seems the only one defending the religion of rape is you, Christiefan. As far as I can tell, you're the only person on this forum that will actually go out of their way (even pulling up bullshit sources, like pro-Islamic websites) to defend that sickening, backward religion responsible for more harm toward women than any other religion or ideology in the modern world. If people like you would simply accept that there is a problem, perhaps there is something that could be done about it, such as education programs geared toward integrating Muslim men into western society. But instead, people like you choose to ignore the problem, to your own peril.

What you don't know is that there's no "religion of rape", no matter how much you want there to be.

Here are some 2010 statistics for you: USA Rate of rape per 100,000 population: 27.3 India Rate of rape per 100,000 population: 1.8

The countries with the highest number of rapes, over 30 per 100,000 population, are not Muslim countries. They include Botswana, Sweden, South Africa, Grenada, Nicaragua.

So take your phony, Islamophopic rant and stick it where the sun don't shine. Facts don't lie.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/opinion/murray-violence-against-women-act/index.html



This week, just over 250 days since the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan and inclusive bill to extend the landmark Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives allowed the clock to run out on protections that bill would have provided to millions of women across our country.

It was an inexcusable failure by House Republican leaders and one that will have real-life implications for women who now find themselves with nowhere to turn for help. It was also another reminder, coming on the same day that House Republican leaders refused to pass aid to states ravaged by Superstorm Sandy, that these leaders continue to answer to the most radical elements of their party regardless of who or what is at stake.




why would a christain do this?
 
But we all know just how christiany the republican party is right?

The Republican Party has been hijacked by the radical right; I agree allowing the VAWA is a problem. That, combined with a number of other issues, will probably prevent me from voting Republican in '14 (depending on the candidate). However, I reiterate that even the nuttiest Christians pale in comparison to radical Islam. Where would you prefer to live: a country controlled by the radical elements of the Republican Party, or Iran?

For all intents and purposes, religion causes social harm wherever it is prevalent. But the worst of all religions - not only toward women, but toward reason and progress as well - is Islam.
 
Back
Top