economic ruin, it is inevitable unless MAJOR changes are made. take for instance the recent flap over Romney's words. Well maybe folks didn't like it, but it was dead on balls accurate.
We are 16 trillion in debt and people keep squabbling about who ran up the tab. That is like the folks on the Titanic arguing about who didn't see the iceburg.
When you factor in unfunded liabilities it comes to $65 trillion if you go with the small number (depending on the PV you use).
Where are we going to get $65 trillion from? Arguing over a 4% tax increase on the so called rich is like pissing in the ocean. And from where I sit I don't see anyone who wants to give up their gobblement benefits because "they paid into the system".
Ask yourself this question, if the Fed weren't buying our debt, who would? What happens one day when there is a debt auction and there are no takers? Grab your financial ankles and kiss your ass goodbye.
Romney's comments were nothing but stupid on many levels. It appears you are just buying into a bunch of racist hype on Obama.
I am concerned about economic ruin too. However, I am a bit more optimistic and, you might not accept this, pragmatic.
First off, I think you are very wrong about who is the best option here. We would be in ground wars throughout the middle east if that nut McCain had won. I disagree with it on principle, but Obama avoided consulting congress on Lybia because that psychopath would have demanded more ground troops. Biden was right about using special forces more (an idea long advanced by libertarians). If McCain had won we would be entangled in Lybia, Syria, Pakistan, Iran and Egypt. Romney seems hell bent on taking us into Iran and that could drag us into all of those.
With congress on his side (it's not as if the Dems ever really oppose spending) Romney will spend us into oblvivion. He claims he wants to cut taxes, which is a dumb idea. I don't know, he may be less gullible than Ryan on the subject, but still I don't see him doing anything good for the debt.
If anyone can reform SS/Medicare it is Obama. Romney will not be able to do it. It's similar to the fact that only Clinton could reform Welfare and only Nixon could go to China. Likewise, it will probably be a Republican that finally does something about ending the drug war.
Obama will be a lame duck on other issues. He will not be able to enact any more big government plans. He would be even less powerful if the GOP ditches Romney and instead focuses on Congress. That is one reason to applaud the idiotic comments of Romney.
If Obama can do something about the long term sustainibility of SS/Medicare then the unfunded liabilities will not be that big of a problem. It is not as if investors (they are not as dumb as partisans) do not consider them now and they still feel we are a good bet. We will just turn them into external liabilities, which will lead to more inflation, but...
For the pragmatism, why on earth would you waste energy and money on bogging yourself down here if you expect ruin? That is stupid. Forget that I will be sipping tea with Lowaicue or chewing on the Royal Rat in Belize. You grab your ankles I will "Ride the River."