"Science" textbook for fundamentalist homeschoolers

Dear god.....I can't....

3595-i-dont-want-to-live-on-this-planet-anymore.jpg
 
So basically, their explanation for everything is to throw their arms up in the air and say "goddidit."

How depressing. These people demonize the scientific method, while enjoying all the fruits of it (e.g. modern technology)
 
This is probably the most damning part:

"Those who disregard the Bible believe instead that everything got here by itself. They call this description of how things began the Evolution Model. Evolutionists try to guess what events caused things like the moon."

LOL. Evolution has nothing to do with the moon. Evolution is a theory of biology. Explanations for the origin of the moon would be tackled by astronomers, not biologists.

It's actually quite embarrassing to even read that.
 
It's been posted elsewhere on here that this same textbook will be used in schools throughout Louisiana soon funded with government mone. Who has a problem with that?
 
It's been posted elsewhere on here that this same textbook will be used in schools throughout Louisiana soon funded with government mone. Who has a problem with that?

I would have to see a link before I believed that this exact texbook would be used in a public school. LA may be looking at some texts that also mention Intelligent Design, but I can't see this textbook being used.
 
Even mentioning creationism as a viable belief that refutes science in a tax payer supported school is objectionable.

Since google is foreign to you...
http://lasciencecoalition.org/category/louisiana-science-textbooks/

It is important to recall this event because it marked the first — and so far only — victory that defenders of science have had in Louisiana, a state in which — where public officials are concerned — standing up for science is a liability rather than a cause for commendation. (UPDATE: An alert LCFS member noted my omission of the fact that LCFS successfully fended off HB 580 during the 2011 legislative session. This stealth creationist bill would have undercut the oversight of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education over school districts’ purchase of supplementary materials and would have written the professional staff of the Department of Education out of its role in reviewing textbooks, etc. That victory came in spring of this year, so we will have another anniversary to celebrate next June!)

The people who have attacked the teaching of science in Louisiana are still around. One of them is young-earth creationist (YEC) Charles Voss, who for years has partnered with the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) in its effort to undermine the teaching of evolution. Voss is vice-president of the YEC Origins Resource Association (see the ORA Facebook page). ORA’s president is YEC chemist Edward Boudreaux (do follow this link), who was involved in the passage of the 1981 “Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act,” which was declared unconstitutional in 1987 by the United States Supreme Court. (See Boudreaux’s Facebook page.) Note that the ORA was founded in 1980 as “Louisiana Citizens for Academic Freedom in Origins.” (Ring any bells?) Let’s take a look at what Voss has been doing since the approval of the textbooks last year.
 
The problem I see is, that is a Christian school book, and not a Home school book.

Christian schools are going to teach Creation theory, and there's not a whole lot you maggots can say about it.
 
The Balanced Treatment Act, which required the teaching of “creation science” along with evolution, was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987. The Court explicitly rejected the “academic freedom” defense. But losing in court has never deterred creationists. A small band of brave souls simply — and opportunistically — ditched the “young earth” and “flood geology” (that’s Noah‘s flood) and rebranded themselves as “intelligent design theorists.” They also continued to write creationist legislation — except that such bills must now be written as “stealth” bills using code language such as “critical thinking,” as in the 2008 Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA). There is only one teensy-weensy problem: the Louisiana Family Forum (LFF) and its disciples just can’t seem to get the “stealth” part down. Continue Reading »

http://lasciencecoalition.org/

With voucher programs being put in place taxpayer money is being used to teach this crap.
 
With voucher programs being put in place taxpayer money is being used to teach this crap.

Why are you opposed to EDUCATION? Shouldn't we teach EVERYTHING and not CENSOR what is taught? Isn't that how we keep from becoming brainwashed by governments and stuff? By being free to discuss and talk about EVERYTHING, and not just the things YOU wish to discuss?

I'm not going to live in YOUR world... you need to get that through your thick heads. I don't give a damn if you have to be fought in the streets for 100 years with stones and knives, I am STILL NOT going to live in YOUR world. I REFUSE! So there! You can keep trying to make me, you can keep attempting to strong-arm me, and I will continue to resist you with every fiber of my being until the day I die, and then someone will take my place. Bottom line, you will NEVER succeed.
 
Sunday school belongs in church. Comparative religions class could be an elective but not science class.
 
The problem I see is, that is a Christian school book, and not a Home school book.

Christian schools are going to teach Creation theory, and there's not a whole lot you maggots can say about it.

Well, if the point of Christian schools is to create retards, sure. I have no problem with that since we can then bring pack full service gas stations everywhere, as a surplus of idiots should result in some of them pumping my gas.
 
Even mentioning creationism as a viable belief that refutes science in a tax payer supported school is objectionable.

Since google is foreign to you...
http://lasciencecoalition.org/category/louisiana-science-textbooks/

I did not defend teaching ID in public schools. I simply said that I would need to see links before I believed that the textbook discussed in the OP will be used by any public schools. Your link was very interesting, but I did not see where it said anything about the textbook in question.
 
Why are you opposed to EDUCATION? Shouldn't we teach EVERYTHING and not CENSOR what is taught? Isn't that how we keep from becoming brainwashed by governments and stuff? By being free to discuss and talk about EVERYTHING, and not just the things YOU wish to discuss?

I'm not going to live in YOUR world... you need to get that through your thick heads. I don't give a damn if you have to be fought in the streets for 100 years with stones and knives, I am STILL NOT going to live in YOUR world. I REFUSE! So there! You can keep trying to make me, you can keep attempting to strong-arm me, and I will continue to resist you with every fiber of my being until the day I die, and then someone will take my place. Bottom line, you will NEVER succeed.

Dixie, even you cannot possibly be in favor of students being taught the bullshit that is in that textbook. "Electricity is a mystery"? "We cannot even say where electricity comes from"? WTH? In what world does that pass for an acceptable science textbook?
 
With a voucher program church schools will use tax dollars to teach from this book or something like it...very poor use of taxpayer dollars and very poor quality education.
 
With a voucher program church schools will use tax dollars to teach from this book or something like it...very poor use of taxpayer dollars and very poor quality education.

I do not agree with teaching ID in conjunction with actual science. That is what I have seen that they want, for science to share space with intelligent design. If that is done, the voucher programs can take kids from under-performing, bad schools and get them a better quality education, even if some extra nonscientific information is taught.

But this textbook makes a mockery of education altogether and lies to the student outright.
 
It's been posted elsewhere on here that this same textbook will be used in schools throughout Louisiana soon funded with government mone. Who has a problem with that?

Cite? I hope this isn't true. Of course I would have a problem with that, because the book is embarrassingly backwards and suppresses information.
 
Back
Top