LOL, I laid out the question as people knew it when they convicted this guy and for a minimum of 25 years after. It was a candid experiment on the short sightedness of statists, like yourself, and you fell right in to it by displaying your ambivalence to anothers plight once the gov has done what they wanted to do.
No, you simply left out the fact that the person in the example was innocent. You made a fool of yourself and continue to do so, with your inability to see your failure.