Every president since Nixon and every candidate showed their taxes because they wanted to prove they had no investments or dealings with companies that could jeopardize their decisions. Hillary showed 30 years of hers and you stupid rightys still call her crooked. Trump has a lifetime of dirty dealings and bankruptcies. Most Americans think a person running for the most powerful office in the world should prove they are not compromised by their finances. I am certain you did not hold that position before trump came along and refused to show his after promising many times that he would. Is this where i tell you to piss off? That , makes posts so much better.
Top US doctor says coronavirus now an ‘outbreak,’ possibly a ‘pandemic’
- Thread starter Guno צְבִי
- Start date
Every president since Nixon and every candidate showed their taxes because they wanted to prove they had no investments or dealings with companies that could jeopardize their decisions. Hillary showed 30 years of hers and you stupid rightys still call her crooked. Trump has a lifetime of dirty dealings and bankruptcies. Most Americans think a person running for the most powerful office in the world should prove they are not compromised by their finances. I am certain you did not hold that position before trump came along and refused to show his after promising many times that he would. Is this where i tell you to piss off? That , makes posts so much better.
Hillary lost, didn't she? Perhaps she shouldn't have shown her tax return.
President Trump's tax return/s are none of your business...just his tax lawyers and the IRS.
Into the Night
Verified User
99.99964% of the world population is not infected. It's not a pandemic. Not even close.
Into the Night
Verified User
It's actually not that easy to catch this virus. Math error: argument by randN fallacy. Redefinition fallacies (science<->scientists,intelligent<->scientist, credential<->science, scientist<->antibiotics)...buzzword fallacy (alt right)...
Put away your Holy Entrails. You can't predict the future with them.
You are being a jerk, Earl. And you are, in effect, accusing me of lying.
I stand by everything I have posted here...and I see none of it as being controversial. One does not have to have lots of money to be happy or content.
My suggestion is for you to knock it off for today...and start again tomorrow without all that bullshit.
If you decide to double down with this kind of nonsense, though, I am going to put you on IGNORE. And once you are there, you do not come off. I would not like that to happen, but I am absolutely tired of your crap today.
Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
I take it you hate Trump, just because he is Trump.
Coronavirus is a nothing burger. Only 0.00036% of the world population even has it.
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
Define 'lots of people'. In China, some 3000 people died of it, out of a population of 1.386 billion. That's a death rate of 0.0002146%.
It's far more likely for people to be killed by their government in China than by Coronavirus, such as during their campaign to suppress revolutionaries in 1950, resulting in 1.2 million deaths in a single year.
Into the Night
Verified User
No. There is nothing to panic about. Panic does very little good anyway.
Into the Night
Verified User
Irrelevant. The President is not required to show any tax information at all, except to the IRS, just like the rest of us.
You don't get to speak for anybody but yourself.
She is.
Define 'dirty dealings'.
Normal in the real estate development industry.
Attempted force of a negative proof fallacy. Guilty before proven innocent doesn't work.
Trump is a proper noun. It is capitalized.
Irrelevance fallacy. He does not have to show anything.
Usually.
Insults are a fallacy. They generally do not make posts better.
Into the Night
Verified User
Bulverism fallacy. Argument of the stick fallacy.
Trump doesn't even take the president's salary, so why would his financial dealings compromise his ability to perform his duties?
You are incorrect to assume I gave a shit about any of the president's taxes in my voting life.
This is where I AGAIN tell you to piss off.
How do you know their numbers are accurate? Do you trust the Chinese? Remember, they sent the police to the first Dr. who discovered and contracted the virus to not even tell his colleagues, much less anyone else. That Dr. (in his 30's) has since died.This virus isn't their "revolutionaries in 1950," it's spreading across the globe. And it's the Chinese's fault for not allowing the world's pharmaceutical companies to get a head start on a vaccine. Oh, and I can do simple math...
Clearly many in the Alt Right do think this is all "partially" a hoax, and a waste of time.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Shsss don't point out the obvious to him. He can't handle the truth.
ExpressLane
Verified User
I see what you did there.
Would you trust a police officer with no visible means of support, who spent a lot of cash, just because he did not use his salary?
In fact, not worrying about a salary is considered a huge red flag for embezzlement or worse crimes. Embezzlers rarely ask for a raise, for obvious reasons. If you have a bookkeeper who has not asked for a raise in 10 years, either he (or she) is a family member, or embezzling. No one wants to believe it, but it is almost always true.
We know that trump could not possibly get loans from legitimate sources. his constant bankruptcies meant that no one wanted to lose more money on him. So the question is who is he beholden to with his loans. They came through Deutsche Bank, but not from it. Deutsche Bank has admitted to laundering money for Putin. This does not look good.
I do not doubt that. Tax returns are very solid facts, and I doubt solid facts influence your voting.
It really does not matter to the Alt Right if the numbers are accurate, or even vaguely truthful. If the numbers say what they want, they believe them. If the numbers do not say what they want, they do not believe them.
Would you trust a police officer with no visible means of support, who spent a lot of cash, just because he did not use his salary?
In fact, not worrying about a salary is considered a huge red flag for embezzlement or worse crimes. Embezzlers rarely ask for a raise, for obvious reasons. If you have a bookkeeper who has not asked for a raise in 10 years, either he (or she) is a family member, or embezzling. No one wants to believe it, but it is almost always true.
We know that trump could not possibly get loans from legitimate sources. his constant bankruptcies meant that no one wanted to lose more money on him. So the question is who is he beholden to with his loans. They came through Deutsche Bank, but not from it. Deutsche Bank has admitted to laundering money for Putin. This does not look good.
I do not doubt that. Tax returns are very solid facts, and I doubt solid facts influence your voting.
That's all speculation and scenarios.
Another person's tax returns are none of my business. If there was an issue, The IRS would be on him like stink on shit. THAT is a fact.
Of course you doubt, you're a liberal. You vote blue, no matter who. I vote for the individual that best represents my beliefs