Time to once again re-educate idiot libs. The Civil War was NOT about slavery

"The declaration stated the primary reasoning behind South Carolina's declaring of secession from the U.S., which was described as "increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the Institution of Slavery"
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Emancipation Proclamation President Abraham Lincoln decrees that all slaves in Rebel territory are free on January 1, 1863.
Click to expand...

Why didn't llincoln free the slaves in the 4 union states that practiced slavery??? Those were the states he had control over. The slaves in the confederacy were in a foreign country and he could not enforce his proclamation there. !!!! THINK
 
katzgar said:
you need to read the articles of secession put forth by the traitor states. yes, the CW was all about slavery.
Click to expand...

Yes such a bore. I recall posting 6 or 7 slave now Republican states articles of secession 10 years ago. This topic is just trolling by dixie racist shitheads, all 10000 instances it is posted.
 
Teflon Don said:
Actually every state that voted on queer marriage, voted against it. It was liberal courts that brought us that travesty. I am all for letting States vote on it. The democrat party? Not so much
Click to expand...

Yup - the priest scandal proved that queers are child molesters and most americans say NO to that.
 
Teflon Don said:
Actually every state that voted on queer marriage, voted against it. It was liberal courts that brought us that travesty. I am all for letting States vote on it. The democrat party? Not so much
Click to expand...


another deplorable that has no clue how this country works.
 
Lincoln defeated the south and emancipated all slaves. You hillbillys ALL need to be frog marched through the civil rights museum in Memphis, then chain gang marched to Appomattox Courthouse, then dragged to the Lincoln memorial to kiss Lincoln's feet, then forced to repent after which you are all summarily executed using a cow killer
like the movie No Country for Old Men.

 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
Lincoln defeated the south and emancipated all slaves. You hillbillys ALL need to be frog marched through the civil rights museum in Memphis, then chain gang marched to Appomattox Courthouse, then dragged to the Lincoln memorial to kiss Lincoln's feet, then forced to repent after which you are all summarily executed using a cow killer
like the movie No Country for Old Men.]
Click to expand...

Actually Lincoln did not emancipate all slaves. It was about 90%, in the south. The emancipation of all was made possible by his winning the war, which then led to a constitutional amendment ending slavery after he was assassinated.
 
Craig234 said:
Actually Lincoln did not emancipate all slaves. It was about 90%, in the south. The emancipation of all was made possible by his winning the war, which then led to a constitutional amendment ending slavery after he was assassinated.
Click to expand...

Up to a million former black slaves died of starvation and diseases after the war. The south was virtually destroyed so they were able to fully appreciate their freedom by dying in mortal agony instead.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Craig234 said:
Actually Lincoln did not emancipate all slaves. It was about 90%, in the south. The emancipation of all was made possible by his winning the war, which then led to a constitutional amendment ending slavery after he was assassinated.
Click to expand...

Distinction without a difference in the context of a neoconfederate hate group fake history thread re civil war.

The test here is what side of the op are you on. If you don't shout them down you are by definition a racist
 
Corazón said:
Actually around 750,000 Americans died not the 400,000 Northerners you keep harping on about. Oh, and up to a million blacks died from starvation and pestilence but who cares about that? The ironic aspect to all this is that you probably support the Catalans against fascist Spain!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17604991
Click to expand...

No, I think the Catalans should STFU, personally.

As regards the American Civil War, North/Union = America.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I know, right? And such credible <snort> sources too.

I didn't click on the links because I'm all out of mindbleach, but let me guess -- states rights are prominently mentioned? Funny how contards are all for states rights until a state okays something that they don't like. Like SSM, for instance. Then suddenly we need a Constitutional Amendment to stop them from doing that.
Click to expand...

yes like when Bush and cox held back the rules in GLB act foir the bank broker rules and when the states tried to band together and MAKE STATE RULES the banks had to follow what did the right do?


STOP THE STATES from protecting people
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/sav...the-nations-future/ar-AAuiOmb?ocid=spartandhp



7/12/2001
12:52 PM




Ivan Schneider
News

Connect Directly

Some Firms Elude Anti-Money Laundering Rules

A regulation requiring broker-dealer subsidiaries of banks to report suspicious activities to the government has gone unenforced since passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the General Accounting Office reported. As a result, large portions of the financial system are outside the reach of anti-money laundering initiatives.

A regulation requiring broker-dealer subsidiaries of banks to report suspicious activities to the government has gone unenforced since passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the General Accounting Office reported. As a result, large portions of the financial system are outside the reach of anti-money laundering initiatives.

The regulation, issued by the Treasury Department in 1996, requires depository institutions-including broker-dealer subsidiaries-to file Suspicious Activity Reports, or SARs, whenever criminal activity is suspected.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top