John McShame is a real pill

I didn't think you could do it.

How long will I have to wait until you fulfill your remaining 2 promises?

One down, 2 to go.

Everyone already knew you wouldn't answer a simple yes or no question.

You promised to call out some hypocrites and I promised to do the same.

That you got confused once again and misunderstood my comment isn't my problem.
 
You've been banning me from more and more threads, that's my proof.

Proof of what?

Are you suggesting that you think your baby boy Zappacrite is right when he says that someone who uses threadbans is a coward who fears honest discourse?

I won't be shocked to discover (again) that you can hold contradictory views without a shred of self-awareness.

Can't take the liberal viewpoint?

Low tolerance for shills, racists, liars, hypocrites and idiots. Take that any way you want to.

Take a look at the users on that list, and ruminate on how you earned your place among them. :D
 
Everyone already knew you wouldn't answer a simple yes or no question.

You keep saying "everyone knows" . Maybe you should ask someone want "everyone" means.

If you can logically present a valid reason for me to express an opinion on something that happened during the last administration, do so.

You promised to call out some hypocrites and I promised to do the same.

You're misrepresenting what happened. I promised to condemn ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being. And I did.

Y O U promised to 1. Condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, which you did. I thanked you for your candor. You also promised to:

2. Own up to your own double standard, and

3. Admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".

You promised to perform all 3 obligations "right after" I condemned ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.

I fulfilled the agreed-upon terms, and 2 of your obligations remain outstanding.

Fortunately (for me), I have the evidence - in the form of direct quotes.

Do you need me to post it again?

Yes, or no?

That you got confused once again and misunderstood my comment isn't my problem.

I didn't misunderstand, and I have the direct quotes to prove it.

Are you a man of your word?

Yes, or no?
 
You keep saying "everyone knows" . Maybe you should ask someone want "everyone" means.

If you can logically present a valid reason for me to express an opinion on something that happened during the last administration, do so.



You're misrepresenting what happened. I promised to condemn ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being. And I did.

Y O U promised to 1. Condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, which you did. I thanked you for your candor. You also promised to:

2. Own up to your own double standard, and

3. Admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".

You promised to perform all 3 obligations "right after" I condemned ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.

I fulfilled the agreed-upon terms, and 2 of your obligations remain outstanding.

Fortunately (for me), I have the evidence - in the form of direct quotes.

Do you need me to post it again?

Yes, or no?

I didn't misunderstand, and I have the direct quotes to prove it.

Are you a man of your word?

Yes, or no?

As I said, you made an ignorant ASSumption.

Hilarious that you expect me to respond to THREE requests when you only responded to one.

Another typical GBA diversion.
 
Proof of what?

Are you suggesting that you think your baby boy Zappacrite is right when he says that someone who uses threadbans is a coward who fears honest discourse?

I won't be shocked to discover (again) that you can hold contradictory views without a shred of self-awareness.



Low tolerance for shills, racists, liars, hypocrites and idiots. Take that any way you want to.

Take a look at the users on that list, and ruminate on how you earned your place among them. :D

I'd rather consider the users you omitted from that list. Says a lot about your character.
 
As I said, you made an ignorant ASSumption. Hilarious that you expect me to respond to THREE requests when you only responded to one. Another typical GBA diversion.

You agreed to three requests and only fulfilled one when I only agreed to and fulfilled one.

Shall I post your promise for the forum to review and judge, or will you honor your remaining 2 obligations?
 
You agreed to three requests and only fulfilled one when I only agreed to and fulfilled one.

Shall I post your promise for the forum to review and judge, or will you honor your remaining 2 obligations?

Really?

You've got a quote from me agreeing to answer all three of your "points"?

As I said, you ignorantly ASSumed I would respond to three requests when you only responded to one.

That's what you get for ASSuming.
 
Last edited:
Is that so?

Are you saying that any user who utilizes the thread ban feature is a coward who fears honest discourse? :D

If I were cowardly, wouldn't I use the IA feature or simply fail to respond when challenged?

No, I am saying you are a coward for dodging a simple yes or no question.

Cowards like you will find any way possible to avoid answering a very simple question.
 
No, I am saying you are a coward for dodging a simple yes or no question. Cowards like you will find any way possible to avoid answering a very simple question.

Then answer this very simple yes or no question.

Did you make this promise?

Now, condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, own up to your own double standard, and admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".

I will, right after you condemn ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.

I condemn ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.
 
Really? You've got a quote from me agreeing to answer all three of your "points"? As I said, you ignorantly ASSumed I would respond to three requests when you only responded to one. That's what you get for ASSuming.

Sadly, I did assume that you would honor a commitment that you voluntarily made in public.
 
Sadly, I did assume that you would honor a commitment that you voluntarily made in public.

Still waiting for you to cite where I said I"d respond to all three of your demands if you responded to my single request.

Feel free to post that quote or admit you made another ignorant ASSumption.
 
So that's a NO, you can't quote me saying I'd do all three. I humbly accept your concession.

What a lying weasel you are. You and Christiecrite are a perfect pair.

1.
Now, condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy,

2.
own up to your own double standard, and

3.
admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".

I will, right after you condemn ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.


 
Back
Top