So you won’t answer the question?
As far as the Second, I’m good with a well regulated militia.
There is no Constitutional right to drive a car ,or own a nuke.
We ARE THE MILITIA, DIPSHIT.
So you won’t answer the question?
As far as the Second, I’m good with a well regulated militia.
So you won’t answer the question?
sorry......yes, the cherry trees in Traverse City are blooming....
sorry......yes, the cherry trees in Traverse City are blooming....
Still too pussy to answer, I understand
I pointed out you were lying about only wanting to require insurance.....why are you too much of a pussy toi lie about your goals.....
It's the OATH they take.
Still no answer… typical
The ARMED "resources officer" was NOT THERE, AND THE BACK DOOR WAS LEFT UNLOCKED = HOW HE GOT IN...
IF THESE TWO COMMON SENSE PROCEDURES HAD BEEN FOLLOWED (OFFICER THERE THE ENTIRE DAY) AND NO UNLICKED BACK DOOR, IT LIKELY WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED.
LEFT'S KNEE-JERK RESPONSE?
"DISARM THE LAW-ABIDING"....
the school councilor or resource at shooters high school should have reported shooter as being a danger to himself or others.
then he would have had to go to the black market for weapons.
a bitch slap IS an answer.....
Unless 88 percent of Americans are Leftists it's not the Left's response. Yours is the Right fringe response. Keeping teenagers from buying guns is also not "disarming" them.
So should grocery stores now be hardened ??
Big gaps in your reasoning:
Councilors and such reports can keep a kid out of school, but the kid has to be evaluated by a licensed psychiatric doctor before being listed ineligible to buy a gun. Given Abbotts defunding, that wouldn't happen beyond a certain point.
And why a black market? By you gunners creed, shouldn't he be able to just buy weapons from legal gun owners without any registration or license?
Man, stop grasping at straws to defend the SOS from the gun lobby.
Horse shit. 88% of Americans do not want to disarm the law abiding. 18 is an ADULT, LEGALLY.
What would have stopped Ramos from buying those guns?
NOTHING. He had no record. Was of legal age.
The LEFT'SOLUTION IS TO RESTRICT THE RIGHTS OF THE LAW-ABIDING, BECAUSE OF THE FEW WHO ABUSE THEM, AT THE SAME TIME, THEY SUPPORT SOFT-On-CRIME BULLSHIT, LIKE NO CASH BAIL, RIDICULOUSLY EARLY RELEASES AND EVEN REFUSAL TO PROSECUTE OTHERS.
TRY TO MAKE SOME SENSE WITH YOUR "BIG SOLUTION".
IF THE SCHOOL HAD MERELY FOLLOWED THEIR OWN PRECEDURES, IT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED LIKE IT DID.
Unless 88 percent of Americans are Leftists it's not the Left's response. Yours is the Right fringe response. Keeping teenagers from buying guns is also not "disarming" them.
Big gaps in your reasoning:
Councilors and such reports can keep a kid out of school, but the kid has to be evaluated by a licensed psychiatric doctor before being listed ineligible to buy a gun. Given Abbotts defunding, that wouldn't happen beyond a certain point.
And why a black market? By you gunners creed, shouldn't he be able to just buy weapons from legal gun owners without any registration or license?
Man, stop grasping at straws to defend the SOS from the gun lobby.