Here is what an UN-BOUGHT Democratic rep acts like

Jack said:
My view: Until you take the Money out of Politics, the 'Donor Class' is going to pick the Congress. The best you can hope for is a Bernie Sanders.
Click to expand...
They might not pick Congress, but they surely own them once they get in.
 
Without "Big oil' the individual who posted the OP would not exist.
These are the same people that two years ago screeched about "big Pharma".
 
Althea said:
That's your opinion. You're entitled to that.

You aren't entitled to your own facts.

If you read her bio, then you lied on purpose.
Click to expand...

I already read her bio. My comments on her stand. Just because you go to Harvard doesn't make you smart. It means you went to Harvard.
 
Jack said:
"Andrew Yang’s Third-Party Aspirations"
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/andrew-yangs-third-party-aspirations

"Andrew Yang, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur who has never held elected office, became a household name when he ran for the Democratic nomination in the 2020 Presidential election. After dropping out of the race in February, 2020, he set his sights on the mayoralty of New York City, and briefly led the Democratic primary polls before losing the nomination to Eric Adams. This month, Yang declared his next pivot. As he published a new book, called “Forward: Notes on the Future of Our Democracy,” he announced that he is starting the Forward Party, which he hopes will break the “duopoly” dominating American politics."
Click to expand...




He is dumb as fuck or flat out evil
 
Althea said:
Or propane. Or any other energy source. There is a future in Hydrogen/Solar, but we have to rid the world of the fossil fuel lobbies.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/solar-to-hydrogen-remarkable-efficiency-jump
Click to expand...

You just don't get it. Solar is horribly inefficient and you can't get around that. The watt density of sunlight on the planet averages 1.4 kw per meter square. That isn't going to suddenly change. The efficiency of solar panels is at best around 20%. That means you get about .25 to .3 kw per meter square out of that in DC power. You have to convert the DC to AC to make it useful as well as make sure you have the correct voltage. Since solar panels only work roughly half or less of the time, you need a way to make power when they don't work. That means duplication of your generation system at greater cost and possibly installation of a storage system if necessary.

This means that to get a kw day of power out of solar, you need about 5 kw of installed capacity and 3 kw of batteries or other storage.

Hydrogen or ammonia as a portable fuel is very doable--WITH NUCLEAR. It is grotesquely expensive with solar.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You just don't get it. Solar is horribly inefficient and you can't get around that. The watt density of sunlight on the planet averages 1.4 kw per meter square. That isn't going to suddenly change. The efficiency of solar panels is at best around 20%. That means you get about .25 to .3 kw per meter square out of that in DC power. You have to convert the DC to AC to make it useful as well as make sure you have the correct voltage. Since solar panels only work roughly half or less of the time, you need a way to make power when they don't work. That means duplication of your generation system at greater cost and possibly installation of a storage system if necessary.

This means that to get a kw day of power out of solar, you need about 5 kw of installed capacity and 3 kw of batteries or other storage.

Hydrogen or ammonia as a portable fuel is very doable--WITH NUCLEAR. It is grotesquely expensive with solar.
Click to expand...



You gonna start using your guns?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Hydro can only be built where there is a suitable water supply to run it. Geo-thermal, same thing. Those are limited by geography. The only viable, non-carbon producing energy source we have right now that can supply abundant and reliable power when it is geographically not possible to use something like hydro or thermal is nuclear. Solar and wind are expensive, unreliable, and uneconomical.

The others from your link are absurd

Ocean / tidal is incredibly inefficient and expensive. That's why nobody is doing it.
Biomass is no different from fossil fuel only less efficient.
Hydrogen is only possible with masses of cheap electricity to make the hydrogen to begin with and that requires nuclear.
Click to expand...

Proving once again how ill informed, and ignorant, any right winger is. Have you ever heard of INNOVATION? If left to flat earth types like you (luddites all) we would still be using horses, and buggies. Fortunately though we have had a history of free thinkers willing to take a gamble on an idea. Free thinkers like Edison, Tesla, Marconi, and the list goes on, and on. So now we have thorium being used to replace uranium, hardened timber to replace steel and concrete, bigger generators, more powerful wind turbines that use less wind flow, and again the list goes on. Oh yes, biomass is being used to electrify small towns.

Times are changing, and fools like you will be left wondering in amazement at the changes made.
 
I really like Kati Porter.
She was a student of Elizabeth Warren at Harvard Law School.

So was Michelle Wu, a young Asian broad currently leading in the polls to become the new Mayor of Boston.
This bright kid has a future as well.

Warren is a brilliant teacher as well as legislator. I just wish that she had a more local accent. And also that she or Bernie were President.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
You just don't get it. Solar is horribly inefficient and you can't get around that. The watt density of sunlight on the planet averages 1.4 kw per meter square. That isn't going to suddenly change. The efficiency of solar panels is at best around 20%. That means you get about .25 to .3 kw per meter square out of that in DC power. You have to convert the DC to AC to make it useful as well as make sure you have the correct voltage. Since solar panels only work roughly half or less of the time, you need a way to make power when they don't work. That means duplication of your generation system at greater cost and possibly installation of a storage system if necessary.

This means that to get a kw day of power out of solar, you need about 5 kw of installed capacity and 3 kw of batteries or other storage.

Hydrogen or ammonia as a portable fuel is very doable--WITH NUCLEAR. It is grotesquely expensive with solar.
Click to expand...
You just can't stop lying. Why is that?

Solar thermal is extremely efficient, and if you bothered to read the link you would see that it is becoming more efficient in a lab setting right now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top