Corona Virus Peak Watch Thread

Hello moon,

Show them the Swedish death spike and the failure of their ' no mask, herd-immunity ' policy.

Deaths in Sweden have dropped off dramatically but that came at a tragic cost.

The deaths per million in Sweden is even greater than the deaths per million in America. 575 vs 541.

Both figures are high compared to the world figure of 103 deaths per million.
 
We will know soon, we already have a few places above 50% with anti-bodies, we will be able to dispense with these often wrong alleged experts arguing about it.


https://fortune.com/2020/08/21/covid-antibodies-india-pune-survey-herd-immunity/

Where's your evidence that there's any lasting immunity to Covid 19 at all ? Science doesn't seem to have any- so where does yours come from ? Pentecostal tongues ? Not from your ' Fortune ' link .
Yet here you are, trumpeting that it exists . Muppet.
 
Where's your evidence that there's any lasting immunity to Covid 19 at all ? Science doesn't seem to have any- so where does yours come from ? Pentecostal tongues ? Not from your ' Fortune ' link .
There seems to only be anecdotal evidence of "reinfection". There appears to be no evidence that a person who had mild or no symptoms the first time would be needing a ventilator the second time.

COVID-19, after it kills off all of those susceptible, may end up being no worse than a bad cold.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html
Having antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19 may provide protection from getting infected with the virus again. If it does, we do not know how much protection the antibodies may provide or how long this protection may last.

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/07/24/covid-reinfection
Research suggests coronavirus reinfection is unlikely
But despite the anecdotal reports from doctors about patients becoming reinfected with the coronavirus, researchers say there's no evidence supporting the notion that people can become reinfected with the virus within a short time period.

"I haven't heard of a case where it's been truly unambiguously demonstrated," said Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

For instance, South Korea's Center for Disease Control and Prevention in one study confirmed that, among 285 cases of people who again tested positive for the coronavirus two months after receiving their initial positive test results (including some who were experiencing Covid-19 symptoms two months after their initial diagnoses), none of the patients' new samples contained enough virus particles to allow researchers to grow the virus from the samples in a lab. Researchers said those results indicated that the patients weren't actively infected with the virus, and the diagnostic tests likely had detected dead virus particles that remained in their bodies or generated false-positive positive results.

Further, the researchers noted that none of the patients who re-tested positive for the coronavirus transmitted the pathogen to others.

"It was pretty solid epidemiological and virological evidence that reinfection was not happening, at least in those people," Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, said.

As for studies showing that antibodies for the novel coronavirus decline over time, researchers say that's how antibodies work for a host of viruses.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,

There seems to only be anecdotal evidence of "reinfection". There appears to be no evidence that a person who had mild or no symptoms the first time would be needing a ventilator the second time.

COVID-19, after it kills off all of those susceptible, may end up being no worse than a bad cold.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/testing/serology-overview.html
Having antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19 may provide protection from getting infected with the virus again. If it does, we do not know how much protection the antibodies may provide or how long this protection may last.

https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/07/24/covid-reinfection
Research suggests coronavirus reinfection is unlikely
But despite the anecdotal reports from doctors about patients becoming reinfected with the coronavirus, researchers say there's no evidence supporting the notion that people can become reinfected with the virus within a short time period.

"I haven't heard of a case where it's been truly unambiguously demonstrated," said Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

For instance, South Korea's Center for Disease Control and Prevention in one study confirmed that, among 285 cases of people who again tested positive for the coronavirus two months after receiving their initial positive test results (including some who were experiencing Covid-19 symptoms two months after their initial diagnoses), none of the patients' new samples contained enough virus particles to allow researchers to grow the virus from the samples in a lab. Researchers said those results indicated that the patients weren't actively infected with the virus, and the diagnostic tests likely had detected dead virus particles that remained in their bodies or generated false-positive positive results.

Further, the researchers noted that none of the patients who re-tested positive for the coronavirus transmitted the pathogen to others.

"It was pretty solid epidemiological and virological evidence that reinfection was not happening, at least in those people," Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, said.

As for studies showing that antibodies for the novel coronavirus decline over time, researchers say that's how antibodies work for a host of viruses.

That sounds very encouraging. Thanks for posting.
 
There seems to only be anecdotal evidence of "reinfection". There appears to be no evidence that a person who had mild or no symptoms the first time would be needing a ventilator the second time.

COVID-19, after it kills off all of those susceptible, may end up being no worse than a bad cold.

' Seems to be ' and ' maybe ' are not data- although you're welcome to share somebody else's wishful thinking, of course.
 
' Seems to be ' and ' maybe ' are not data- although you're welcome to share somebody else's wishful thinking, of course.

I'm following the science. You are free to follow your Socialist anti-American politics. Have a really nice fucking day!
smiley-wavey.gif
 
Hello moon,

Like your ..er....science, your image is phoney too.

I vetted the link Dutch Uncle posted. It's legit.

I know it may sound too good to be true, but it is on the level. And in these tumultuous times we could sure use some encouraging news. The thought that one could get this disease twice was quite terrifying. I am so glad to see some solid science behind believing that is not possible.

Now, if you would like to post something to support the idea that what Dutch has posted is 'phony' have at it.

I'll give your link just as much scrutiny as I did his.

The people quoted in his link are well renowned scientists who have been very professional and have not taken political sides.

I hope you don't view science as political.

Science is science.

It doesn't always tell us what we may wish to hear, but if it does then it supports believing in good things. This crisis is bad enough without making it worse by considering political points.

Science, like the virus, doesn't care about politics.

Science is science. Seeking the truth.

We ignore it at our own disadvantage.

If something is good news for humanity, that has to override what may or may not be considered politically beneficial for one side or the other.

Good news for humanity is a good thing!

It has to be.
 
Active Cases have jumped beyond the slight 'peak' seen on August 16th.

We are still on the way up.

We continue to fail to get control of the virus in the USA.
 
Saturday

8-22

USA

Total Cases 5,841,428

New Cases +43,829

Total Deaths 180,174

New Deaths +974

Total Recovered 3,148,080

Active Cases 2,513,174

Serious, Critical 16,739

Tot Cases/1M pop 17,633

Deaths/1M pop 544

Total Tests 75,475,175

Tests/1M pop 227,827
 
Saturday

8-22

USA

Total Cases 5,841,428

New Cases +43,829

Total Deaths 180,174

New Deaths +974

Total Recovered 3,148,080

Active Cases 2,513,174

Serious, Critical 16,739

Tot Cases/1M pop 17,633

Deaths/1M pop 544

Total Tests 75,475,175

Tests/1M pop 227,827

Does your source track the death and/or sick rate? Sick is in bed for more than 3 days, not just the sniffles.
 
Hello Dutch Uncle,

Does your source track the death and/or sick rate? Sick is in bed for more than 3 days, not just the sniffles.

Yes, it tracks the death rate for individual nations and for the world overall.

It also tracks everyone who is confirmed sick with COVID-19, meaning there was a positive virus test.

It also tracks those who are in serious or critical condition.

It does no track whether they are walking around with no symptoms, self-isolating, at home in bed, or in the hospital with a strong case that is not considered 'serious' by hospital definition.

Worldometer


There is quite a bit of information there if you're curious enough to poke around the site. Lots of graphs.

The world death rate is 5%.

The USA death rate is also 5%.

The Swedish death rate is 5.75% (This figure was not given. It was arrived at by dividing the given total deaths in Sweden by the given population of Sweden and multiplying by 100%)
 
We could use math to estimate how many MORE Americans would be dead if the USA had the same death rate as Sweden.

It would be in the thousands.
 
Sunday

8-23

USA

Total Cases 5,874,146

New Cases +32,718

Total Deaths 180,604

New Deaths +430

Total Recovered 3,167,063

Active Cases 2,526,479

Serious, Critical 16,717

Tot Cases/1M pop 17,731

Deaths/1M pop 545

Total Tests 76,159,378

Tests/1M pop 229,889
 
Back
Top