**BREAKING NEWS** - FLYNN CASE DROPPED TOTALLY EXONERATED

floridafan said:
Do these documents tell us that Flynn pleaded guilty twice. That Trump fired him for lying, that Pence also recommended firing Flynn for lying?
Click to expand...

It has already been explained to you numerous times. You are simply too dense to understand. That or you are purposely being obtuse. Either way,...doesnt matter,....just sit back and watch what happens. You will be proven dreadfully wrong within days,... not weeks or months. ;)
 
Last edited:
ThatOwlWoman said:
I wonder how you can be "TOTALLY EXONERATED" from charges that you pleaded guilty to -- twice?
Click to expand...

Easy when you actually look at the FACTS. Of course you would have to not be a partisan hack dumb fucker like yourself to actually do that though. And YES,...I know you see this. Thats why I do it, its fun!!! ;) :cool:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I wonder how you can be "TOTALLY EXONERATED" from charges that you pleaded guilty to -- twice?
Click to expand...
I made a mistake yesterday, Sullivan DOES have to sign off even though charges were dropped. (my apologies).

A formality i'm sure -but there it is. I think he'll just null process it instead of ruling..which means Flynn is not charged or being under a court review..
is that exonerated? legally there is no difference if it's null processed or not guilty.

He's a free man -now he needs to sue the Deep States Creeps/DoJ for damages
 
THE JPP LEFT HAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION's GLARING VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION , BLATANT PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT and VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS, AS LONG AS THE VICTIM IS SOMEONE THEY DON'T LIKE.
 
Last edited:
Stone said:
It has already been explained to you numerous times. You are simply to dense to understand. That or you are purposely being obtuse. Either way,...doesnt matter,....just sit back and watch what happens. You will be proven dreadfully wrong within days,... not weeks or months. ;)
Click to expand...

You know nothing!!!
 
FOR THE SLOW-ON-THE-UPTAKE JPP LEFT:



FLYNN WAS ENTRAPPED, WHICH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; HIS FAMILY WAS THREATENED TO COERCE A GUILTY PLEA, WHICH IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL; HIS 302 FORM WAS ALTERED BY STRZOK/PAGE/THE FBI, WHICH IS A FELONY;

YES, EVEN FOR THE OBAMA ADMNISTRATION .
 
floridafan said:
You know nothing!!!
Click to expand...

You know what I know? I know I worked 4 12 hour days this week so I could take today " to figure material list , pick up materials, and lay project out" and this weekend off so I can build my wife that six foot tall 80 foot long cedar fence she has been wanting in the back yard as a Mothers day gift. Meanwhile people like you sit on their asses all day cheering for a bad economy and living off my and millions of other productive peoples taxes. THATS what I know.
 
Stone said:
You know what I know? I know I worked 4 12 hour days this week so I could take today " to figure material list , pick up materials, and lay project out" and this weekend off so I can build my wife that six foot tall 80 foot long cedar fence she has been wanting in the back yard as a Mothers day gift. Meanwhile people like you sit on their asses all day cheering for a bad economy and living off my and millions of other productive peoples taxes. THATS what I know.
Click to expand...

That's a good idea for Mother's Day. Tough to get out shopping these days...
 
BartenderElite said:
Nope. Are you really suggesting that a racist conspiracy like birtherism isn't lower than "Russian collusion"?
Click to expand...
. It would be lower if there had been an FBI investigation and then a special prosecutor appointed to do a two year investigation with an unlimited budget and no deadline. If " Russian collusion " had just remained a rumored hoax , birtherism would be lower. But people's lives were ruined over process crimes because of a process that was always a big hoax. Nobody's life was ruined over birtherism.
 
The DOJ filed a motion to dismiss "with prejudice" but declined to state the reason and evidence why in their motion. In fact, no career DOJ lawyers put their name on the motion, which means it was written by a political appointee. This presents a couple of bad things for the DOJ; by not affirming the contents of the motion, the DOJ is basically saying that they should be able to decline a prosecution in any case, with no evidence or reason apparent. Obviously, there has to be a reason for the motion to be accepted. By not providing those reasons, the DOJ has opened themselves up to having to testify under threat of perjury the reasons why they are filing the motion, and they would also have to present clear evidence. Their motion contains neither, and this is probably how the whole thing will play out:

Judge Sullivan: You filed this motion to drop the charges.
DOJ: That's right.
Judge Sullivan: Why are you dropping the charges?
DOJ: ...
Judge Sullivan: ...
DOJ: Because Trump wants it
Judge Sullivan: Well, that is a separation of powers issue, so motion denied, and sentencing will now commence. And since I'm in a bad mood because you wasted my time, the taxpayers' time, and everyone else's time, I'm going to give Flynn the full sentence and submit your actions as prosecutorial misconduct that violates the separation of powers explicitly written in our Constitution. So you can either be disbarred, or go to prison alongside Flynn. Your choice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top