Armed Citizen Stops Shooter at Indiana Mall: GOOD GUY WITH A GUN

[jakemax]

We need people like this person in Uvalde.

Lol, you leftists don't allow guns in schools. That would stop you from achieving the body counts you drool over.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Why do you want to ban people from voting, is the more apropos question?

I think it's because you realize that if everyone participated in our democracy, your voice would carry far less influence because no one would give a shit about it.

If your are going to turn the US into an autocracy, then you should do it right by limiting the vote.

You can’t have a democracy and an autocracy at the same time, dear.

 

[jakemax]

Good guy 1
Bad guy 3

Still unacceptable.

Stop letting violent crazy criminals go free.

 

[jakemax]

Over a hundred good guy's with gun's and shield's did nothing for 77 minutes, while a gunman killed 19 children and two teachers at the school in Uvalde?!! Pure cowardice?!! Stick that good guy with a gun theory up your ass?!!

Hey you lying faggot, if those were good guys they would have done something!

 

[jakemax]

He didn't shoot until 3 people had already been killed.

He's no hero.

You stupid lying cocksucker. You don't have any idea what happened, you're just a lying little coward faggot bitch!

 

[Grokmaster]

Over a hundred good guy's with gun's and shield's did nothing for 77 minutes, while a gunman killed 19 children and two teachers at the school in Uvalde?!! Pure cowardice?!! Stick that good guy with a gun theory up your ass?!!

Democrat-run police dept. REPUBLICAN BORDER AGENTS HAD TO KILL THE SHOOTER.

THE OTHER POLICE WERE COWARDS WITH GUNS...LIKE YOU WOULD BE.

 

[Grokmaster]

This whole premise is based off very fragile assumptions that someone with a gun is willing to risk their life. Basically, you people watch too many movies. Officers who normally carry a protect and serve duty aren't necessarily even going to what you're expecting random citizens and school teachers do. Maybe grow up and admit red flag laws aren't taking guns away from anyone except those that shouldn't have them.

THE ENTIRE JPP LEFT IS CLEARLY UPSET THAT ONE OF THEIR BELOVED SHOOTERS WAS STOPPED BY A CITIZEN.

THEY ARE MISRABLE OVER IT...SEE? ^^^^^

 

[Grokmaster]

376 officers in Uvalde beg to differ. I wish the guy wasn't able to buy a killing machine. Then there would be no need for a 'good guy with a gun'. Less than 1% of mass shootings are stopped by an armed citizen. So I guess I should start a thread for each of the 99% of shootings that aren't stopped?

If you don't give a kid a gas can and a book of matches, you won't need a fire extinguisher. Get it? Probably not.

400 DEMOCRAT-LED OFFICERS IN UVALDE are NOW SEEN AS COWARDS,

 

[Grokmaster]

SO ANSWER THE ?

Are u disappointed that there was another guy with a gun there?

THEY OBVIOUSLY ARE PISSED THAT A REGULAR CITIZEN SHOWED WHY WE SHOULD BE ARMED...TO STOP CRIMINALS.

 

[Grokmaster]

I'm not crying about the armed citizen. I think he's a hero. He should not be put in that position. Apparently you are too fucking stupid to figure that out. You laughable gutless keyboard warriors are a joke. You would have run the other way as fast as you could.

Meaning what? He should not have taken the responsibility of carrying a legal weapon ???

 

[Grokmaster]

Respectfully, allowing citizens to carry was never meant to be a “deterrent.” There’s only one way to “deter.”

IT HAS "DETERRED" THE SHOOTER, WHO WILL NEVER HARM ANOTEHR PERSON.

 

[volsrock]

The point is that there was a body count in the first place.

Body counts in Chicago every week and u dont say a damn word

 

[volsrock]

He is no hero.

Up until the moment he shot the guy, he was a bad guy with a gun too because he was concealing a weapon where he knew he wasn't allowed to.

For your info u commie bastard

Police: Bystander who shot suspect carried gun legally

Ison said Dicken confronted the gunman within the first two minutes of the shooting. Dicken, who could legally carry the firearm under the constitutional carry law, was armed with a pistol and fired several rounds, striking the gunman.


When asked if shoppers could legally carry guns inside of Simon malls for any reason, a spokeswoman for Greenwood Park Mall referred to owner Simon Property Group's Shopper Code of Conduct, which simply states "no weapons." She did not elaborate.



If customers ignore those policies or signs in some states, they are violating the law and can be charged with a crime. That's not the case in Indiana; not exactly.




Indiana gun laws:A look at what changed July 1

Greenwood Park Mall's no-weapons policy is akin to a "no shoes, no shirt, no service" sign you might see at a gas station, or a sign requiring masks in order to shop, said Guy Relford, an Indiana attorney and firearms instructor who is a prominent voice on the state's gun laws. Such signs are simply stating a business owner's policy.

Attorney: No-gun policy won't create legal issue for armed bystander
If a customer does not adhere to the policy, a business owner can demand that the customer leaves. And if the customer ignores that demand, the customer is now trespassing, which is an Indiana crime.


"So the fact that (Greenwood Park Mall) had a no-gun policy creates no legal issue whatsoever for this gentleman," Relford said, "and it certainly has no effect whatsoever on his ability to use force to defend himself or to defend the other people in the mall."


https://www.indystar.com/story/news...policy-bystander-carried-legally/65375923007/

Now go jerk off to the NK flag u stupid POS

 

[volsrock]

He didn't shoot until 3 people had already been killed.

He's no hero.

And the fireman that pulls only 4 kids out of 7 from a burning building is no hero...he got in late and left 3 to die


God u are a fucking sick Commie mother fucker

 

[leaningright]

IT HAS "DETERRED" THE SHOOTER, WHO WILL NEVER HARM ANOTEHR PERSON.

LOL … I definitely agree with this. I just wanted LV to state the endgame … which he/she did.

 

[volsrock]

This is the kind of story that is a nightmare for Democrats. Think how many more people would have been killed if they had to wait for the cops to show up and do something.

 

[leaningright]

I'm glad you asked because I have given this a lot of thought:

1. Ban all future gun manufacturing so that the supply cannot continue to grow, and ban all retail gun sales.

2. Offer a *very generous* and *very anonymous* gun buyback scheme by offering 20-100x what the value of the value of the gun is. By making it anonymous, anyone in any house can take a gun and bring it to the cops and walk out the PD with a huge check. The goal there is that you will have family members taking other family members' guns and trading them in for cash, which everyone needs. Oh, and this buyback only lasts for a limited time, so if you don't do it within the timeframe, you will NEVER be able to do it. It would also be the biggest economic stimulus ever, and would certainly help the economies of all those welfare red states.

3. Those who refuse and still keep their dumb guns would lose them once they die, and all guns must be turned into the police when the owner dies. If a gun is transferred to someone else after someone's death, that's a felony with mandatory prison time. You can only own the guns you own, no more.

4. If you use a gun in a crime, that is an automatic life sentence. If you traffic guns, that is an automatic life sentence. If you sell guns, that is an automatic life sentence. If you give a gun to someone and they use it in a crime, you both get automatic life sentences regardless of the crime.

5. End all ammunition manufacturing so the supply cannot grow, and offer a buyback plan for ammo where you also pay 20-100x the value.

6. Ban guns for all local and state law enforcement, so that the only people who are carrying guns are the Secret Service and the FBI, the only people who should be carrying guns IMO.

Thank you for this …

 

[volsrock]

I wouldn't be so sure about that.

Guns are a drug, and just like any drug, people get addicted to them.

Addicted To Bang: The Neuroscience of the Gun
https://www.forbes.com/sites/steven...-the-neuroscience-of-the-gun/?sh=6719cbf57eed

And those who are addicted to guns see using those guns as compulsory and sole response to criminal behavior, even if that criminal behavior is non-violent.

You have said yourself that you're willing to murder people over non-violent crimes, so there's a pretty strong connection between the feeling you get holding and/or firing a gun, and the motivation to fire it.

Since your brain is wired to release highly addictive dopamine when you fire that gun, the more you fire it, the more dopamine your brain releases.

So the gun very much causes you to fire it because the gun triggers the release of dopamine in your brain.

Guns are a drug, and just like any drug, people get addicted to them.

Bullshit

I have only 3, since 1987,,,thats all I need

 

[leaningright]

Ask yourself why that guy chose HIghland Park specifically for his shooting.

Ask yourself why the Tree of Life shooter chose a synagogue for his shooting.

Ask yourself why Nazis chanted "Jews will not replace us" in Charlottesville, and ask yourself why Tucker Carlson spreads the blood libel about replacement theory.

None of those shooters ever seem to target self-indulgent white centrists...but they do target Jews, Latinos, Blacks, gays, etc.

Excuse my language, but the bolded above is a bunch of baloney.

 

[volsrock]

I'm glad you asked because I have given this a lot of thought:

1. Ban all future gun manufacturing so that the supply cannot continue to grow, and ban all retail gun sales.

2. Offer a *very generous* and *very anonymous* gun buyback scheme by offering 20-100x what the value of the value of the gun is. By making it anonymous, anyone in any house can take a gun and bring it to the cops and walk out the PD with a huge check. The goal there is that you will have family members taking other family members' guns and trading them in for cash, which everyone needs. Oh, and this buyback only lasts for a limited time, so if you don't do it within the timeframe, you will NEVER be able to do it. It would also be the biggest economic stimulus ever, and would certainly help the economies of all those welfare red states.

3. Those who refuse and still keep their dumb guns would lose them once they die, and all guns must be turned into the police when the owner dies. If a gun is transferred to someone else after someone's death, that's a felony with mandatory prison time. You can only own the guns you own, no more.

4. If you use a gun in a crime, that is an automatic life sentence. If you traffic guns, that is an automatic life sentence. If you sell guns, that is an automatic life sentence. If you give a gun to someone and they use it in a crime, you both get automatic life sentences regardless of the crime.

5. End all ammunition manufacturing so the supply cannot grow, and offer a buyback plan for ammo where you also pay 20-100x the value.

6. Ban guns for all local and state law enforcement, so that the only people who are carrying guns are the Secret Service and the FBI, the only people who should be carrying guns IMO.

who should be carrying guns

really?

Hitler thought Jews should not carry guns...we know what happened