Black ‘Mobs’ Attack White Patrons Outside Wis. State Fair

How funny is it that Yurt doesn't understand what "reverse racism" means in the common vernacular?

reverse racism, in the common vernacular, would have to be something which was the opposite of racism.......that which is racism against a different group of people is simply racism.......unless you consider racism to be a directional definition.......racism against blacks is racism, racism against whites is reverse racism......racism against Asians is a half double twist with a full back spin racism.....etc......
 
reverse racism, in the common vernacular, would have to be something which was the opposite of racism.......that which is racism against a different group of people is simply racism.......unless you consider racism to be a directional definition.......racism against blacks is racism, racism against whites is reverse racism......racism against Asians is a half double twist with a full back spin racism.....etc......

Righties are dopey....
 
reverse racism, in the common vernacular, would have to be something which was the opposite of racism.......that which is racism against a different group of people is simply racism.......unless you consider racism to be a directional definition.......racism against blacks is racism, racism against whites is reverse racism......racism against Asians is a half double twist with a full back spin racism.....etc......

Reverse racism is not racism against white people, reverse racism is the act of raising one race above another in an atempt to avoid racism, the majority of black players on basketball teams might be considered reverse racism, its not belittling the group simply raising it above others
 
Listen idiot. This is a debate forum.

We debate topics.

The topic of this thread is the media coverage of the event.

If you want to debate the event itself, start another thread. That's how it works, plain and simple. No one is stopping you from starting a thread.

Furthermore, your comment in not right on the money, but rather it misses the mark entirely so shut the fuck up.

Why don't you shut me up, you pusillanimous pissant semen sipper.
 
Uh huh - and where did I do that?

You have tremendous reading issues.

all you've done is defend it. you didn't condemn it. you attacked me and then you went off on a tangent how it is ok because there was more racism by whites 50 years ago. we get it, you support black racism because whites were more racist 50 years ago.
 
Maybe our African American brothers should get their nigger friends under control before it gets out of hand.....

Is that too harsh ?....I'm a new rapper, I'm allowed to use the n word....

Yo DAWG.
I see you got your "license".
Word up.
 
I guess these kinds of attacks are becoming a prevalent thing, kind of like the old raging back in the 90s...

Some time they'll hit a few people with some CCW permits and it's going to get ugly.

Yeah.
The Liberals will start screaming that those that defended themselves were just a bunch of racists who were looking to shoot some young black men, who were just exercising their right to congregate.
 
I hope you are happy now Damocles.

There are legitimate limits to free speech.

Now you have Bravo casually dropping the n-bomb in current events.

Now you have Alias on some high horse of his own creation, dropping the n-bomb four times in one thread.

Your sublte comment about it obviously flies right over the two bigot's heads.

I talked to a former member today whose only comment was "never going back".

Nice work. Could there be a reason there are only forty active posters? I wonder. Not.

You might consider taking his advise.....see ya.
 
Fine, you want to discuss the event, let's begin

Every week if one reads multiple newspapers, one reads of a family in hopeless financial straites, becoming victims of murder suicide.

Blacks suffer far great finacial derpivation than whites during hard times, especialy young uneducated and unskilled.

The un-employment figures are skewed, (as we all know) but the part that is seldom discussed is the disparity of un-employment with regards to income, specificaly, at or above $150K salary, unemployment is 1% or about the number of those voluntarily between jobs regardless of the economy. As we recede down the income scale, the number of un-employed increases in inverse proportion to income. At $40K we see about 9% or whatever it happens to be today. When we reach $10K the percentage jumps to a staggering 40%. Remember, these figures are based on un-employment statistics. These are people who WANT to work. Further, without doubt, the numbers are even higher for blacks.

Milwaukee is an industrial city, like Detroit. The industrial states have been hit hardest of all by un-employment. Young black men who live there are likely financialy hopeless, more so than a working person can imagine in their wildest nightmares.

Armegeddon is coming rich white conservative mutherfuckers. It has started already, where the pain is the greatest. As the economic pain spreads and increases, your neighborhood will not be safe either. The rich, of course know all this, and are ready for it, since they caused it by their over the top greed. The rich had enough to be comfortable and then some. It was madness on their part to crush and break so many familys and spirits so that they might have a little bit more, and they will deserve what they get as they are slaughtered. This lastest Tea Party madness is but the icing on the cake. Is it really that hard to study the french revolution, to know what comes next?

Calling it about race is one way the well to do, the comfortable and the wealthy can deny the reality of what they have created, nothing more.

I beleive that Dune just called for a race war!!
Have you always been a follower of Chales Manson?

You might want to watch what you wish for.
 
all you've done is defend it. you didn't condemn it. you attacked me and then you went off on a tangent how it is ok because there was more racism by whites 50 years ago. we get it, you support black racism because whites were more racist 50 years ago.

Wow, can you ever not read.

Seriously...how have you gotten this far w/out that capability?
 
Originally Posted by Yurt all you've done is defend it. you didn't condemn it. you attacked me and then you went off on a tangent how it is ok because there was more racism by whites 50 years ago. we get it, you support black racism because whites were more racist 50 years ago.

If thats not what you meant....

wow.....can you ever not write....
 
If thats not what you meant....

wow.....can you ever not write....

Okey dokey - let's see what words I wrote that made you think that.

Glad you posted again, btw - love how Yurt & the rest of the righties skipped right on by your idiocy earlier in the thread. No double-standard there.
 
Do we know if race was the key factor? It appears to be a mob completely out of control.

I would tend to agree; but when you have black couples saying that the mob was looking in car windows and not attacking other blacks, it would seem that targeting whites was the intent.
 
why is it when anyone post something about black racism, onceler, nigel, topspin go into full defense mode? instead of addressing the racism that occurred, they imediately attack whoever posted the story. as we can see here, they have accused me of racism and being obsessed with "reverse" racism. first off, this is not reverse racism. it is racism, period. secondly, attack the messenger instead of addressing the facts it what onceler is great at. lastly, i fail to see how posting this thread makes me a racist. why is it you guys have to defend this racism and attack anyone who condemns it? because whites were more racist 50 years ago. that logic is absurd. well...50 years ago whites were more racist, so we shouldn't have a problem with any black racism today.

:rolleyes:

well...this post sure stumped the snot of the far left wacko libs

:)
 
Back
Top