Indeed, TOP.The Smithsonian is doing a review of it's own...perhaps it's time for changes...
Change is coming to the Smithsonian whether they like it or not.
Indeed, TOP.The Smithsonian is doing a review of it's own...perhaps it's time for changes...
He lies when the truth would serve him better...and he is cheap...no class at all.We aren't.
Pathetic lie of the day dismissed.
Sure but not the totality of our history.
Other good things happened...like defeating the Axis in WWII.
The issue is balance.Good thing the Smithsonian covers that also.
It was bad but it wasn't all "evil." Don't apply a historian's fallacy to it by applying modern values to events of the past and trying to make an equivalence.So, are you suggesting its not bad if carried our well?
Stay on the positive side TopBack to the OP...I'm sure the Smithsonian could use a refreshing...![]()
Yes, and those things are documented and celebrated in the Smithsonian.Sure, but not the totality of our history.
Other good things happened...like defeating the Axis in WWII.
But there was some pretty evil shit going on.It was bad but it wasn't all "evil." Don't apply a historian's fallacy to it by applying modern values to events of the past and trying to make an equivalence.
Accuracy in meaning matters. Those folks are not saying "slavery was good". That matters."...and some believe that good things are being set aside to focus on this bad thing."
Why do we care what 'some believe' when it is not true?
What is true is that Trump and DeSantis and other magats are focused on purging any of the negative while only focusing on what they see as positive, even if they have to spin or lie about that positive such as 'slavery was not all bad as some slaves learned good skills'.
Time and again, such as in the military now, they purge 100% of anything black or LGTBQ focused that was good, including the people's high level jobs. they want no sign of it, anywhere.
Always!!Stay on the positive side Top![]()
Accuracy involves being clear and not just correct.Accuracy in meaning matters. Those folks are not saying "slavery was good". That matters.
Always!!
Things here are great!!
As I said, point out someone that says that. I would disagree with them. It doesn't matter if I learn how to be a smith, if I was beat into the job rather than wanted it. However, telling folks that is what they are saying when they are simply saying that this is not all of our history and we shouldn't only focus on the bad is not the same thing as saying "slavery was good". These things are not the same.Accuracy involves being clear and not just correct.
As i said, it is spin to push the idea that slavery was not all bad as some slaves learned some good skills like cooking, carpentry, etc.
So, what were the good parts of slavery, Jethro?Since you are wrong, I will tutor you once again.
A White House official told NBC News Tuesday night that Trump plans to extend his review of museums beyond the Washington-based institution, saying he will start to “get the woke out of the Smithsonian” and then go from there.
The Smithsonian exaggerates the bad and ignores the good.
What part of "the good" ended with "of slavery" other than in your own head.So, what were the good parts of slavery, Jethro?
Good point. Black people are unworthy of freedom.What part of "the good" ended with "of slavery" other than in your own head.
This is where the problem lies. While I personally do not think that the Smithsonian has a focus on slavery to the detriment to other history as there are 21 different Smithsonian Museums and most of them have nothing to do with slavery, I fully comprehend saying "The Smithsonian focuses too much on slavery to the detriment of other history" is not the same thing as saying "slavery is good". Nomad.
And other than you, who said that?Good point. Black people are unworthy of freedom.
You implied it. Now look up the word, "imply."And other than you, who said that?