So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?

Good thing the Smithsonian covers that also.
The issue is balance.

If you grossly over-weigh the bad over the good, that's a problem.

"President Trump on Tuesday complained that the Smithsonian museums in Washington were “out of control” with content that painted the country in a negative light, including about slavery.

“The Museums throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of ‘WOKE,'” Trump posted on Truth Social.

“The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, ***where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future,”*** he added. (Asterisks are mine)

“We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made,” Trump wrote. “This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE.”
 
worldpopulationreview.com › country-rankingsCountries that Still Have Slavery 2025 - World Population Review

"Despite global efforts, modern slavery is widespread, with 167 countries harboring an estimated 46 million slaves, including forced labor and sexual exploitation."


America is not one of them that has slavery as a national policy.

Context is everything.
 
"...and some believe that good things are being set aside to focus on this bad thing."

Why do we care what 'some believe' when it is not true?


What is true is that Trump and DeSantis and other magats are focused on purging any of the negative while only focusing on what they see as positive, even if they have to spin or lie about that positive such as 'slavery was not all bad as some slaves learned good skills'.

Time and again, such as in the military now, they purge 100% of anything black or LGTBQ focused that was good, including the people's high level jobs. they want no sign of it, anywhere.
Accuracy in meaning matters. Those folks are not saying "slavery was good". That matters.
 
Accuracy in meaning matters. Those folks are not saying "slavery was good". That matters.
Accuracy involves being clear and not just correct.

As i said, it is spin to push the idea that slavery was not all bad as some slaves learned some good skills like cooking, carpentry, etc.
 
Accuracy involves being clear and not just correct.

As i said, it is spin to push the idea that slavery was not all bad as some slaves learned some good skills like cooking, carpentry, etc.
As I said, point out someone that says that. I would disagree with them. It doesn't matter if I learn how to be a smith, if I was beat into the job rather than wanted it. However, telling folks that is what they are saying when they are simply saying that this is not all of our history and we shouldn't only focus on the bad is not the same thing as saying "slavery was good". These things are not the same.
 
Since you are wrong, I will tutor you once again.

A White House official told NBC News Tuesday night that Trump plans to extend his review of museums beyond the Washington-based institution, saying he will start to “get the woke out of the Smithsonian” and then go from there.

The Smithsonian exaggerates the bad and ignores the good.
So, what were the good parts of slavery, Jethro?
 
So, what were the good parts of slavery, Jethro?
What part of "the good" ended with "of slavery" other than in your own head.

This is where the problem lies. While I personally do not think that the Smithsonian has a focus on slavery to the detriment to other history as there are 21 different Smithsonian Museums and most of them have nothing to do with slavery, I fully comprehend saying "The Smithsonian focuses too much on bad things about the US to the detriment of other history" is not the same thing as saying "slavery is good". Nomad.
 
What part of "the good" ended with "of slavery" other than in your own head.

This is where the problem lies. While I personally do not think that the Smithsonian has a focus on slavery to the detriment to other history as there are 21 different Smithsonian Museums and most of them have nothing to do with slavery, I fully comprehend saying "The Smithsonian focuses too much on slavery to the detriment of other history" is not the same thing as saying "slavery is good". Nomad.
Good point. Black people are unworthy of freedom.
 
Back
Top