Well we got this week’s school shooting in the books early

two of your recommendations violate a basic and fundamental right of the 2nd Amendment and the 5th Amendment.......

I disagree, but if DeSantis can punish Disney for having an opinion, on legislation, for sure, we can limit possession purchase, or importation of certain guns.
 
It was already illegal for this person, who was being treated for emotional problems and had expressed an intent to commit suicide, to possess firearms.......I wonder why laws restricting firearms didn't prevent this from happening......oh, that's right....THEY NEVER DO........

Shooter purchased 7 guns legally in Nashville, and 3 of them were used in the shooting

The shooter who killed six people at a private school in Nashville purchased at least seven guns legally and locally, according to Metro Nashville Police Chief John Drake.

Drake said those seven firearms were purchased from five different gun stores in Nashville. Three of the guns were used during the shooting at Covenant School Monday, he said.
 
Then amend the Constitution or have a Constitutional Convention.

You best bring your lunch, it will be an all day job.


Where does the Constitution say you cant ban production importation or sale of arms?

If Florida can Punish Disney for speech, then we can ban guns.
 
Then why can it be illegal to own personally own nuclear arms?

Because un-constitutional limits have been placed on the Second Amendment.

If you are a lawyer, you know this, which is why I have never believed you are a lawyer.
 
your ignorance and extremism is tiring. you liberal morons talk a huge game about 'common sense' laws, but you aren't able to exercise it at all.

I think its common sense to restrict ownership of these weapons that are used to murder our children in mass.
 
Because un-constitutional limits have been placed on the Second Amendment.

If you are a lawyer, you know this, which is why I have never believed you are a lawyer.

You are likely the only person who believes it is a Constitutional Right to own a nuclear weapon.
 
Is it not an arm?

you get two choices with this, barring your hyperbolic bullshit about what you want to define 'absolute' as.......

1. The 2nd Amendment protects the right of the people to own any weapon that the government would use against the people. Therefore, if you believe that the US Government would use nukes on us, then we have the right to own nukes and the government is violating the constitution

2. The 2nd Amendment protects the right of the people to own any weapon necessary to ensure that the federal government doesn't become tyrannical, which would exclude weapons of mass destruction because we the people would not want to destroy the nation, just restore the government.

take your pick and avoid the idiot hyperbole
 
I think its common sense to restrict ownership of these weapons that are used to murder our children in mass.

said no founding father, whatsoever. the only common sense law that the founders intended was to ensure that the government could never outman or outgun we the people to ensure the security of a free state.
 
said no founding father, whatsoever. the only common sense law that the founders intended was to ensure that the government could never outman or outgun we the people to ensure the security of a free state.

Most of the founders were very practical people who believed in checks and balances and could never imagine how we live today.
 
you get two choices with this, barring your hyperbolic bullshit about what you want to define 'absolute' as.......

1. The 2nd Amendment protects the right of the people to own any weapon that the government would use against the people. Therefore, if you believe that the US Government would use nukes on us, then we have the right to own nukes and the government is violating the constitution

2. The 2nd Amendment protects the right of the people to own any weapon necessary to ensure that the federal government doesn't become tyrannical, which would exclude weapons of mass destruction because we the people would not want to destroy the nation, just restore the government.

take your pick and avoid the idiot hyperbole

Where does the 2nd say our right is limited to weapons that the government would use against the people?
 
Back
Top