Will the vigilantes who mutilated the CO Springs shooter be prosecuted?

Please stop being an uneducated person whose sexuality was changed since birth.

Look at his picture. He was no threat to anyone at that point. He was basically lynched by the gay mob. What if he couldnt breathe????

That was taken in court the day after after they tackled and stopped him from shooting people in the bar. Who knows how many more would have died? I hope that is your attempt at humor because it was a terrible statement.
 
That was taken in court the day after after they tackled and stopped him from shooting people in the bar. Who knows how many more would have died? I hope that is your attempt at humor because it was a terrible statement.

We dont know what happened. The shooter may have been just standing there and was attacked by the child-raping homos and he shot back in self defense. The gover-media lies about everything. One more reason i want to see the videos but the PTB have censored them like they always do.
 
So you support gunning down a Black person who is trying to run away, but not gunning down a white person who is shooting people.

It is completely legal almost anywhere on Earth to kill someone in self defense, when they are killing others with a gun. Aldrich was very well treated only get superficial injuries when people disarmed him. He should be grateful to those that disarmed him.

You are a liar. Read my responses to those incidents before you make false accusations. Maybe the illiterates who thanked you should as well.

I know the laws, Walt. Yes, he should have been beaten to death. It would have saved us taxpayers the court and detainment costs.
 
You are a liar. Read my responses to those incidents before you make false accusations. Maybe the illiterates who thanked you should as well.

I know the laws, Walt. Yes, he should have been beaten to death. It would have saved us taxpayers the court and detainment costs.

OK, you want suspected criminals to be beaten to death on the spot to save money for taxpayers? Are you insane?
 
We dont know what happened. The shooter may have been just standing there and was attacked by the child-raping homos and he shot back in self defense.

That is going to make an interesting court defense. You are claiming that maybe Aldrich went to a gay bar heavily armed, when 24 different people stepped up one at a time and attacked him in a way that threatened his life, but did no harm to him at the same time. He then shot all 24 of these random people, who were not armed, killing 5 of them.

The point of a defense is to create reasonable doubt. Does anyone think that claim is reasonable?
 
OK, you want suspected criminals to be beaten to death on the spot to save money for taxpayers? Are you insane?

He wasn't "suspected," you dipshit. He was tackled in his commission of murdering people.
This quote from your previous post:
"It is completely legal almost anywhere on Earth to kill someone in self defense, when they are killing others with a gun."
Why do you contradict yourself?
 
He was no threat to anyone at that point.

Aldrich had shot 24 people, and was reloading to shoot more. That is the very definition of being an extreme threat to everyone. When disarmed of his rifle, he could have still shot people with his backup gun.

This is the best example of a justifiable self defense homicide I can think of, EXCEPT he was not killed... In fact, he was not even badly injured. Through an abundance of care, he spent a few hours in the hospital, but was released with no real treatment needed. He had a black eye, and a few skin abrasions.

What if he couldnt breathe????

At least 5 of the people he shot could not breath, because they were dead. Many of the 19 who survived probably could not breath either.

When dealing with a shooter murdering people, it is very proportional to try to strangle him. Worth noting, he was not strangled, but it would have been reasonable to strangle him.
 
Please stop being an uneducated person whose sexuality was changed since birth.

Most people's sexuality changes massively with puberty. It then develops beyond that. When a boy is 10, he does not have much interest in sex. When he is 14, he might be interested in 14 year old girls. As he matures beyond that, his sexuality should mature to adult women.

Are you sure you know what "sexuality" means?
 
Walter:

“OK, you want suspected criminals to be beaten to death on the spot to save money for taxpayers? Are you insane?”

“When dealing with a shooter murdering people, it is very proportional to try to strangle him. Worth noting, he was not strangled, but it would have been reasonable to strangle him.”

Well, Walter...
 
Walter:

“OK, you want suspected criminals to be beaten to death on the spot to save money for taxpayers? Are you insane?”

“When dealing with a shooter murdering people, it is very proportional to try to strangle him. Worth noting, he was not strangled, but it would have been reasonable to strangle him.”

Well, Walter...

Just wait, he'll try to wiggle out of his stupidity and contradictions. He does it all the time. Walt isn't very bright....
 
He wasn't "suspected," you dipshit. He was tackled in his commission of murdering people.
This quote from your previous post:
"It is completely legal almost anywhere on Earth to kill someone in self defense, when they are killing others with a gun."
Why do you contradict yourself?

The alt right is taking all sorts of crazy positions on this. It would have been perfectly legal to kill him in self defense, but not legal to kill him as punishment for his crimes. There needs to be a trial to decide he is guilty, and deserving of punishment.

Aldrich should be grateful to the people who disarmed him for not killing him. They were able to stop him from killing other people with very minimum injury to him.
 
Walter:

“OK, you want suspected criminals to be beaten to death on the spot to save money for taxpayers? Are you insane?”

“When dealing with a shooter murdering people, it is very proportional to try to strangle him. Worth noting, he was not strangled, but it would have been reasonable to strangle him.”

Well, Walter...

Strangling someone to death to stop them from continuing to kill people is very proportional. Strangling them to death to avoid a trial is murder. I am surprised this is confusing to you.
 
Strangling someone to death to stop them from continuing to kill people is very proportional. Strangling them to death to avoid a trial is murder. I am surprised this is confusing to you.

But, but, but you insist on proportionate responses from the police, Walter.

What about due process, Walter? What about innocent until proven guilty?

When Blacks are killed while trying to kill a police officer, you scream racism...murder.

Confusing you say Walter.

Yes, you always appear to be confused.

Poor Walter.
 
Last edited:
Walter is such a violent person, wishing to strangle to death a perpetrator, unless the perp is a Black trying to kill a police officer.

Walter, I try to use subtlety when posting to you as I see you aren’t very bright. Others have noticed that too, Walter.

Is Walter being intentionally obtuse...no, just obtuse.

Poor Walter.
 
Last edited:
But, but, but you insist on proportionate responses from the police, Walter.

Yes, I insist upon a proportionate response from police, militaries, and even citizens. That is the moral, and legal thing to insist upon. We can debate what exactly it is, but I am confused to why you are insisting on debating against it.

What about due process, Walter? What about innocent until proven guilty?

A proportionate response gets the most number of people due process as possible. Sometimes self defense is necessary, but it should not be unreasonably used. For instance, strangling a Black man because he laughed at being arrested for selling cigarettes is not reasonable. Killing a mass murderer committing murder, who has been offered a chance to surrender, is very reasonable.
 
Yes, I insist upon a proportionate response from police, militaries, and even citizens. That is the moral, and legal thing to insist upon. We can debate what exactly it is, but I am confused to why you are insisting on debating against it.



A proportionate response gets the most number of people due process as possible. Sometimes self defense is necessary, but it should not be unreasonably used. For instance, strangling a Black man because he laughed at being arrested for selling cigarettes is not reasonable. Killing a mass murderer committing murder, who has been offered a chance to surrender, is very reasonable.

Right on, Walter, you finally admit that you are confused. Progress, Walter, progress.

“I insist on a proportionate response from police, militaries and even citizens.”

And:

“Strangling someone to death to stop them from continuing to kill people is very proportional.”

Um...Walter.

Did you learn this at the “shuck and jive school for dummies, Walter?

Poor, poor Walter.
 
Back
Top