You are a white welfare collecting piece of shit who stated clearly here more than once you were a "Black" Hebrew Israelite. You are not black, you are not a jew, and your sure as FUCK never served. Just some limp dick white welfare collecting asshole.
Red Dawn
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
You are a white welfare collecting piece of shit who stated clearly here more than once you were a "Black" Hebrew Israelite. You are not black, you are not a jew, and your sure as FUCK never served. Just some limp dick white welfare collecting asshole.
Poopeye, don't you have toilets to clean??????
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Exactly hence the John Kerry quote.
BTW, I'm not Guno.
What is it with you two guys anyways? I usually try to stay out of cat fights but you two really have an issue with each other. Care to share any background with me?
Exactly hence the John Kerry quote.
BTW, I'm not Guno.
What is it with you two guys anyways? I usually try to stay out of cat fights but you two really have an issue with each other. Care to share any background with me?
I thought that was a Guno quote. Sorry about that Dutch.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I love to bring up the Democratic vote for the war in Iraq whenever they get on their "RWers are war mongers" soapbox.
John Kerry's infamous remark captions the entire Democratic bullshit on Iraq. They voted for it then tried to beat the Republicans over the head for it.
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1072/vote_107_2_00237.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autho...ilitary_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
If the decision had been left only to Democrats, we wouldn't have gone to war, because the majority of the Democratic Representatives in the House voted against the resolution.
It takes the consent of both the House and Senate to wage war.
Moreover, I am not responsible for anyone else's opinion but mine. When I registered on this board in 2006, virtually every conservative to a man supported the invasion of Iraq, while virtually every liberal poster to man and woman opposed the Iraq war.
That was actually one of the main debate issues when this board started: conservatives almost universally defending the Iraq War, and liberal posters universally opposed to it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The Democrats caved out of fear of being "soft on terrorism". All Bush or his people had to do was throw that phrase out and the Democrats dropped to their knees with their mouths open.
Like current Republicans, the Democrats voted to save their jobs, not their integrity.
Neo-cons, yes. Conservatives, not so much**. Military leaders, NFW. US military leadership knew it would be costly in multiple ways for little to no gain.
Result? Tens of thousands of American lives shattered, trillions of taxpayer dollars spent and not a single positive gain for Americans came out of it.
**there's very few conservatives in Congress today. Liz Cheney being one.
23 Democratic senators is not "everybody".
I was on message boards between 2002 and 2005, and the biggest debate, bar none, was the wisdom of invading Iraq.
Conservative posters, virtually to a man, thought invading Iraq was an awesome idea.
Liberal posters virtually to a man and woman, thought invading Iraq was a dumbass idea.
Any attempt to revise history to claim liberals and conservatives were equally gung ho to invade Iraq is contradicted by the lucid memories of anybody over the age of 40.
And where EXACTLY is your link to unbiased, factual proof of this GINORMOUS assumption?
If you provide none - then obviously you just made that sentence up off the top of your head.
Once again - I am neither Dem nor Rep...thank goodness.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The key leadership led the way: "29 (58%) of 50 Democratic senators voted for the resolution. Those voting for the resolution were:
Sens. Baucus (D-MT), Bayh (D-IN), Biden (D-DE), Breaux (D-LA), Cantwell (D-WA), Carnahan (D-MO), Carper (D-DE), Cleland (D-GA), Clinton (D-NY), Daschle (D-SD), Dodd (D-CT), Dorgan (D-ND), Edwards (D-NC), Feinstein (D-CA), Harkin (D-IA), Hollings (D-SC), Johnson (D-SD), Kerry (D-MA), Kohl (D-WI), Landrieu (D-LA), Lieberman (D-CT), Lincoln (D-AR), Miller (D-GA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Reid (D-NV), Rockefeller (D-WV), Schumer (D-NY), and Torricelli (D-NJ)."
I remember the discussion with two former USAF pilots about it. I sided with the JCS, neither of them did but one was an ass about it like your "conservatives" and the other didn't want to go against his friend and became quieter when I laid out the same arguments against the invasion as JCS and other top generals.
Agreed the Democrats weren't "gung ho". I called them chickenshits who tried to save their jobs instead of their integrity. Fucking cowardly politicians.
Fuck them. They knew they didn't have to go so they voted to save their jobs.
Last edited:
Saudi Arabia is not part of NATO. we are free to have individual security agreements that are not formal treaties like NATO is (North American Treaty is foundation for NATO)
And I never ever said Russia was going to invade. I said quite the opposite- although Biden's
"minor incursion" statement gave them the green light to go into Donbas
another reason to give Russia the assurance it needs, in return for Russia guaranteeing the territorial integrity of Uk
never saw it. No ambition to do so. it looks like the usual Russian hysteria morphed into a movie
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Exactly hence the John Kerry quote.
BTW, I'm not Guno.
What is it with you two guys anyways? I usually try to stay out of cat fights but you two really have an issue with each other. Care to share any background with me?
The peckerwood says he knows I am not a Vet or a Jew of color, He is a racist drunk who calls every one fags and follows me around the board
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Thanks. Understood but why? I see the same racist labels tossed back and forth every day or so but never understood the background. The actual cause of the dispute. Usually people don't just start hating each other without reason. Even if it's a crazy reason.
Example; there's a member here who thinks I insulted his mother and also claims I wanted to shoot Americans in the back. Neither are true and he can never produce evidence of his claims. That's the background. What to do? Mostly I ignore it unless I'm feeling ornery.
Maybe if Texas legalized pot, I'd feel less ornery. LOL
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
ROFLMAO. Figures one of Putin's cocksuckers would downplay the Cold War.
1984 was a big year for Americans in many ways....but I don't expect any Russian cocksuckers to understand those times no matter how much training they've had.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Have no idea, think he's drunk most of the time
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
How long has your feud been going on? You don't recall the initial conflict?
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
He just showed up making whacko claims about me
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Had you had a previous conflict with anyone he knows?
While people fly off the handle, when it's a long, sustained and consistent action between two people who, otherwise appear normal, there's always going to be a causal factor...no matter how slight.
It's a curiosity to me. The example pointed out earlier is not the first time I've encountered such actions by other people. Understanding why is often a mystery. It's just in a file labeled "Nutjob"; angry behavior for no discernable reason.
Last edited:
It was. Without their vote it would not have passed. Try again Cypress.