]2epo]v[an
Banned
What does this drivel have to do with the OP?
You're just two team based contrairions at this point.
This.
What does this drivel have to do with the OP?
You're just two team based contrairions at this point.
What you "believe" is of no consequence, as the MEDICAL SCIENCE in testimony in conjunction with the video tapes tells a different story. And WTF do you get your "facts"? Still pulling them out of your posterior? FYI: Chauvin is 5'9", 159 lbs on his official record. The weight doesn't include gun belt, vest. So why don't you lie face down in the street and I'll have someone of similiar measurements kneel on your kneck for 8 minutes or so, and we'll see how that works out for ya!
1. Um, yeah toodles, in a court of law it pretty much does....no jury nullification or judge over-rulling here. What you are doing is just insipidly stubborn sour grapes....
https://youtu.be/QKIobyk6Isc
https://youtu.be/xRoqSyIi-98
Floyd's health had nothing to do with the case. Chauvin killed him.
Floyd's health had nothing to do with the case. Chauvin killed him.
Floyd's health had nothing to do with the case. Chauvin killed him.
Bullshit, it had everything to do with it. Chauvin's hold would not have hurt a healthy man, especially a huge brute like Floyd. He had 90% blockage in the pulmonary artery ffs, heart disease, lung disease andv was a walking pharmacy.
Yeah but what difference does that make? Floyd wasnt a healthy person. So why is it a defense that a healthy person would not have died?
Chauvin's knee was only lightly pressing on his shoulder blade, if you look at the video taken from the rear, you can see he is supporting his weight with his right hand on the patrol car.
I can see at least four grounds for appeal in the Chauvin trial.
The jury should have been sequestered
The trial should have been moved out of state
The city's announcement of $27M payout before trial had even started was truly disgusting
Mad Maxine Waters incitement to violence. She should definitely be impeached and removed from the chair of the Finance Committee
Floyd wasnt a healthy person. So why is it a defense to say that a healthy person would not have died?Sorry you've lost me!
what debate? we have a slam dunk video of it happening.
The store clerk who accepted a $20 bill from George Floyd shortly before Floyd died in a confrontation with police says he immediately suspected the bill was counterfeit — and he says he offered to pay for Floyd's cigarettes himself.
"I thought that George didn't really know that it was a fake bill," Christopher Martin testified Wednesday about taking the $20 bill. "So I thought I'd be doing him a favor."
Aside from that, I don't think holding a knee on Floyd's neck was even warranted, at all.
He was already handcuffed, they had 4 officers there, I had never witnessed such an over the top use of force, unless the person was psychotic, then the cops usually just shoot they guy.
Floyd wasn't psychotic.
Floyd wasnt a healthy person. So why is it a defense to say that a healthy person would not have died?
The cops weren't called for the fake $20.
What makes it a legitimate defense case that a healthy person would not have died? I mean, i could see it if he died after refusing to go to the hospital, that would be a good case. But how is it arguing that floyd would not have died if he was someone else? He wasnt someone else, he was floyd.
How? In what way? How is arguing some other hypothetical scenario arguing the scenario they were charged with a responsability to defend?It has everything to do with it, I can't follow your train of thought!