**BREAKING NEWS** - FLYNN CASE DROPPED TOTALLY EXONERATED

Buck Tucker said:
Don't forget the Durham probe is now a criminal investigation. That means there will be indictments of a number of these dirty cops and scum bags from the Osambo Admin, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and the whole cabal!!
Click to expand...

Yawn. One low level attorney. You have been yapping about these indictments for three years. You have nothing. Give it up.
 
gv050120dAPR20200430084742.jpg
 
Concart said:
Yawn. One low level attorney. You have been yapping about these indictments for three years. You have nothing. Give it up.
Click to expand...

Durham probe is not three years old, and he is FAR from a "low-level attorney".

HE HAS DOZENS OF PEOPLE ON THIS.

WHY ARE YOU OK WITH THE BLATANT CRIMES OF THE WITCH HUNT???
 
The court should not have permitted the crook Flynn to plead down. They did it because he said he would provide info to the FBI. He was not even honest about that. Flynn was pegged as a security problem by the acting AG and the Obama admin. He should have not been allowed inside the election.
 
Nordberg said:
The court should not have permitted the crook Flynn to plead down. They did it because he said he would provide info to the FBI. He was not even honest about that. Flynn was pegged as a security problem by the acting AG and the Obama admin. He should have not been allowed inside the election.
Click to expand...

Because GLARING PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT SHOULD BE ALLOWED?/


"FUCK THE CONSTITUTION" IS YOUR VIEW?
 
Grokmaster said:
Durham probe is not three years old, and he is FAR from a "low-level attorney".

HE HAS DOZENS OF PEOPLE ON THIS.

WHY ARE YOU OK WITH THE BLATANT CRIMES OF THE WITCH HUNT???
Click to expand...

LOL, the low level attorney I'm referring to is the ONLY person who has been mentioned as part of a criminal probe. Your wet dream of getting the 'deep state' is a joke. There will be no indictments of any of the usual suspects. Not for Obama, or Brennan, or Clapper, or Holder, or Hillary, or Lisa Paige, or Peter Strozk, or Comey, or McCabe, or Rosenstein. Your conspiracy theory is galactically stupid. Prepare for disappointment. You should be used to it. Sealed Indictments. Nothing. Unredacted FISA warrants. Nothing. IG investigation. Nothing. McCabe prosecution. Nothing. See a pattern? Or is that yet another skill you lack?
 
Concart said:
LOL, the low level attorney I'm referring to is the ONLY person who has been mentioned as part of a criminal probe. Your wet dream of getting the 'deep state' is a joke. There will be no indictments of any of the usual suspects. Not for Obama, or Brennan, or Clapper, or Holder, or Hillary, or Lisa Paige, or Peter Strozk, or Comey, or McCabe, or Rosenstein. Your conspiracy theory is galactically stupid. Prepare for disappointment. You should be used to it. Sealed Indictments. Nothing. Unredacted FISA warrants. Nothing. IG investigation. Nothing. McCabe prosecution. Nothing. See a pattern? Or is that yet another skill you lack?
Click to expand...

My "DREAM" of crimes being exposed and punished is happening before our eyes.


ONCE AGAIN: WHY ARE YOU OK WITH THE BLATANT CRIMES OF THE WITCH HUNT???
 
Concart said:
Strawman. There ARE NO CRIMES. See how that works?
Click to expand...

ENTRAPMENT=CRIME WITHHOLIDING EVIDENCE= CRIME. ALTERING 302s = CRIME.


ALL VERIFIED BY THE DISCOVERED DOCs...AND THAT's JUST THE FLYNN CASE.

THE ENTIRE WITCH HUNT WAS ILLEGAL...AS WE NOW KNOW.



ONCE AGAIN: WHY ARE YOU OK WITH THE BLATANT CRIMES OF THE OBAMA ADM./WITCH HUNT???
 
Last edited:
Concart said:
LOL, the low level attorney I'm referring to is the ONLY person who has been mentioned as part of a criminal probe. Your wet dream of getting the 'deep state' is a joke. There will be no indictments of any of the usual suspects. Not for Obama, or Brennan, or Clapper, or Holder, or Hillary, or Lisa Paige, or Peter Strozk, or Comey, or McCabe, or Rosenstein. Your conspiracy theory is galactically stupid. Prepare for disappointment. You should be used to it. Sealed Indictments. Nothing. Unredacted FISA warrants. Nothing. IG investigation. Nothing. McCabe prosecution. Nothing. See a pattern? Or is that yet another skill you lack?
Click to expand...
I would never say that. Durham is conducting an extensive criminal probe..I wouldn't say he's gonna indict either.
 
BartenderElite said:
As I said, mods can and do have a p.o.v. and express that all day in debate.

When they start influencing the content of the site, it's bias. It's no different than network - of course reporters have their own p.o.v., but they should keep it out of their stories.

And the site is of course free to have bias, but it should own that, not deny it. I don't think I've been wronged in any way.
Click to expand...

no one has ever denied it. the site doesn't aim to have any point of view. i have stickied threads from both liberals and conservatives. keep whinning.
 
Cohort said:
no one has ever denied it. the site doesn't aim to have any point of view. i have stickied threads from both liberals and conservatives. keep whinning.
Click to expand...

BartenderElite said:
Making the Flynn story a sticky is a major editorial decision. And so JPP joins the ranks of Fox, CNN, MSNBC, talk radio, the NY Times et al. Bias has really infiltrated everything at this point.
Click to expand...
StoneByStone said:
The point is this is yet another case of the forum mods being biased.
Click to expand...

:thinking:
 
the argument doesn't even have merit. other than 2 lines in the OP that one could consider not neutral -, everyone has been able to participate in this thread. it is a conversation for all parties.
 
Cohort said:
no one has ever denied it. the site doesn't aim to have any point of view. i have stickied threads from both liberals and conservatives. keep whinning.
Click to expand...

Reminds me a bit of those on the right who liked to say Obama's full name & try to say innocently that "it's his middle name," and that they had no other motive for saying it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top