**BREAKING NEWS** - FLYNN CASE DROPPED TOTALLY EXONERATED

PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....so you are expecting the judge to proceed to sentencing even though he waited a year for this to happen?.........no child, not going to happen.....
Click to expand...

The judge kept delaying sentencing to give Flynn a chance to retract his plea...he refused to retract that plea for a year.

But the bigger problem with this for Flynn and Trump is that the DOJ will need to provide evidence and reasons for why the charges should be dropped...and they failed to do that in their motion, which means the judge will likely call DOJ lawyers to the stand to explain why they are seeking to drop the charges. Thing is, they have to provide an actual reason because if the only reason they are doing this is because Trump wants it, then that's a separation of powers violation and the DOJ attorneys could face disbarment, contempt, or even share a cell with Flynn.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
he might refuse to accept the dismissal, in which case he would be appealed and likely overturned.....
Click to expand...

The DOJ needs to provide clear evidence as to why they are dropping the charges...no evidence exists in the motion they filed. "With prejudice" is not enough of a standard for a judge to dismiss a guilty plea. The DOJ is going to have to take the stand and testify under oath why they are dropping the charges. Given that no career DOJ people put their names on that motion, it would appear that a political appointee is about to get in over their head.

Maybe they don't really understand the ramifications of prosecutorial misconduct, but if they are filing this motion because Trump wants them to, they better say goodbye to their law careers and/or loved ones because they're about to get royally fucked for Donald Trump.
 
LV426 said:
But the bigger problem with this for Flynn and Trump is that the DOJ will need to provide evidence and reasons for why the charges should be dropped.
Click to expand...

actually no.....with the prosecution submitting the motion there is no need for the defense to prove anything.....
 
"The government’s 20-page brief is not an honest document—perhaps the reason that it is signed only by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia—and not a single one of the career prosecutors who worked on the case. That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning, moved to withdraw from the case entirely just hours before the Justice Department filed its motion."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/ugly-day-justice-department

Good read on the actual facts involved
 
archives said:
"The government’s 20-page brief is not an honest document—perhaps the reason that it is signed only by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia—and not a single one of the career prosecutors who worked on the case. That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning, moved to withdraw from the case entirely just hours before the Justice Department filed its motion."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/ugly-day-justice-department

Good read on the actual facts involved
Click to expand...

Facts?

How quaint. Those haven't mattered in years.
 
LV426 said:
The judge kept delaying sentencing to give Flynn a chance to retract his plea...he refused to retract that plea for a year.

But the bigger problem with this for Flynn and Trump is that the DOJ will need to provide evidence and reasons for why the charges should be dropped...and they failed to do that in their motion, which means the judge will likely call DOJ lawyers to the stand to explain why they are seeking to drop the charges. Thing is, they have to provide an actual reason because if the only reason they are doing this is because Trump wants it, then that's a separation of powers violation and the DOJ attorneys could face disbarment, contempt, or even share a cell with Flynn.
Click to expand...

He needed the evidence that has been discovered, and REVEALED in the past couple of weeks.
 
archives said:
"The government’s 20-page brief is not an honest document—perhaps the reason that it is signed only by Timothy Shea, the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia—and not a single one of the career prosecutors who worked on the case. That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning, moved to withdraw from the case entirely just hours before the Justice Department filed its motion."

https://www.lawfareblog.com/ugly-day-justice-department

Good read on the actual facts involved
Click to expand...


BECAUSE THE "CARREER PROSECUTORS ON THE CASE" (Witch Hunt Operatives)ARE THE ONES GUILTY OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, DUMBASS....ARE YOU REALLY THAT THICK????





Mueller prosecutor withdraws from Flynn case after questions surface concerning his compliance with court order



Brandon Van Grack, a top Justice Department prosecutor and former member of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team, is no longer handling the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, it emerged Thursday afternoon -- and just minutes after that news surfaced, Justice Department sources told Fox News that the DOJ was dropping the Flynn case entirely.

Van Grack is also withdrawing from other unrelated cases as well, raising questions about his future at the DOJ. No explanation was given for Van Grack's abrupt withdrawal from the Flynn case, which was recorded in a brief filing with the court on Thursday. An administration official tells Fox News that Van Grack is still at DOJ and has not resigned.

But Van Grack's removal from the cases came just days after Fox News reported that explosive, newly unsealed evidence documenting the FBI's efforts to target Flynn -- including a top official's handwritten memo debating whether the FBI's "goal" was "to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired" -- called into question whether Van Grack complied with a court order to produce favorable evidence to Flynn.

Since February 2018, Van Grack -- who now heads the DOJ's Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) unit -- has been obligated to comply with D.C. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan's standing order in the Flynn case to produce all evidence in the government’s possession “that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment."


The order also requires the government to submit favorable defense evidence to the court, including possible "impeachment evidence" that could undermine witnesses, even if the government believes the evidence “not to be material.” (Sullivan still has the ultimate authority over what to do with Flynn's case, even after the DOJ withdrawal, given that a guilty plea has been entered.)





Van Grack has long informed Sullivan that the government’s so-called "Brady" obligations, referring to prosecutors' duty to turn over exculpatory materials to defendants, have been met. In an October 2019 filing, Van Grack denied governmental misconduct and assured the court that the government “has complied, and will continue to comply, with its discovery and disclosure obligations, including those imposed pursuant to Brady and the Court’s Standing Order.”

In that same October 2019 motion, Van Grack elaborated on those claims, telling Sullivan that the government had not “affirmatively suppressed evidence” or hid Brady material. He denied that the government was “aware of any information that would be favorable and material to [Flynn] at sentencing.”






https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mue...th-court-order





”
 
floridafan said:
No my always ignorant friend, all that is needed is sentencing.
Click to expand...

How bout this then........ You just keep right on waiting for that sentencing and I'll wait for that winning 50 million dollar lotto ticket of mine to come up. I have a whole lot better chance of seeing my dream fulfilled than you do.
 
floridafan said:
No my always ignorant friend, all that is needed is sentencing.
Click to expand...

You know Florida,.... just because you and your "family" have been in court and charged with enuff crimes to choke a horse does not mean you are a legal expert. It just makes you yet another stupid criminal is all.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I just love how my question triggered a yuge outpouring of poutrage, tears, and the vapors from the Reichtards. :laugh:
Click to expand...

It didnt,... we just like making fun of you because you make it soooooooooooo easy! :) And YES,...I KNOW you see this too! ;)

:magagrin:
 
♫ The sounds of silence... ♫

Today, 07:43 PM
Stone
Senior Member

This message is hidden because Stone is on your ignore list.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
he might refuse to accept the dismissal, in which case he would be appealed and likely overturned.....
Click to expand...
anything possible sure..but Sullivan has been holding off pending Sidney Powell's motions -
now there is absolutely no reason not to dismiss with charges dropped. it's a formality

Sullivan was reluctant to allow Flynn to change the plea -
but surely he'll have no problem with dismissing this cluster-f*ck
 
archives said:
" That may also be the reason why Brandon Van Grack, the prosecutor who has worked the case from the beginning,
Click to expand...
that's the bastard. DoJ claimed they lost some of the docs -until they didn't.. FBI did the same thing under Comey
Grack is a Geek
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top