evince
Truthmatters
petty insults wont change the facts
when this is over you will change your name and come back as someone else
I will still be evince and still be proud of my predictions being correct
annie
TRUMP vs DEEP STATE: “The War Is On”
- Thread starter hvilleherb
- Start date
petty insults wont change the facts
when this is over you will change your name and come back as someone else
I will still be evince and still be proud of my predictions being correct
annie
Comeys letter had nothing to do with intelligence.I see you still cling to that meme is why she lost. good for you
Powers was ambassador to the UN...
we have feedback from Mueller and Rosenstein that Trump is not a target.
WTF does this have to do wit the Deep State?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
There were a ton of reasons Hillary lost - she was a weak candidate who ran a terrible campaign.
Yet w/ all of that, she still would have won w/out that letter consuming the final week of the campaign. That is undeniable.
Comey's letter has everything to do w/ any kind of lunatic conspiracy theory about a "deep state" that has an agenda.
right. she is NOT an investigatior like the NSC-why did she do all the un-masking?
and she denies even doing it?
I think somebody did it in her name *speculation*
Gotcha68
Verified User
I didn't mention Trump. I mentioned Mueller and how it connects to your actual comment about investigating and looking at facts and see where they lead. You want us to do that with regards to the Deep State but ignore it when Mueller does it with his investigation? You get to decide which one is a conspiracy and which one is fact?
That is hypocrisy.
blah blah..Comey was acting as a prosecutor,,nothing to do with intellignce
Mueller is connecting dots.. OK whatever. no argument there
Normally, visiting dignitaries like Prince Mohammed inform the U.S. government of their travel. In this case, he didn't and proceeded to take a lengthy meeting with the incoming administration. Participants from both sides tell me the meeting covered a range of topics about the Middle East -- Iranian expansion, the war in Yemen, counterterrorism. Neither Emirati nor U.S. participants said they broached the prospect of a channel to Russia.
Unmasking Kushner, Bannon and Flynn in that meeting is not in and of itself evidence of political spying. It does not support Trump's claim that Obama had tapped Trump Tower. It doesn't rise to the level of a scandal. What's more, Republicans like Representative Trey Gowdy have praised Rice for her openness this month in her closed-session testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, and reiterated a point made by that committee's chairman, Devin Nunes, that Rice did not violate the law by requesting that some U.S. persons in intelligence reports be unmasked. Rice, according to sources familiar with her testimony, reiterated that she never leaked the information she unmasked.
Gowdy is still trying to get answers. He told me Monday, "The issues are serious enough to warrant an open-minded, objective review, but we don't have all the information necessary to draw to a conclusion."
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...we-still-don-t-know-about-obama-era-unmasking
Unmasking Kushner, Bannon and Flynn in that meeting is not in and of itself evidence of political spying. It does not support Trump's claim that Obama had tapped Trump Tower. It doesn't rise to the level of a scandal. What's more, Republicans like Representative Trey Gowdy have praised Rice for her openness this month in her closed-session testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, and reiterated a point made by that committee's chairman, Devin Nunes, that Rice did not violate the law by requesting that some U.S. persons in intelligence reports be unmasked. Rice, according to sources familiar with her testimony, reiterated that she never leaked the information she unmasked.
Gowdy is still trying to get answers. He told me Monday, "The issues are serious enough to warrant an open-minded, objective review, but we don't have all the information necessary to draw to a conclusion."
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...we-still-don-t-know-about-obama-era-unmasking
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
You're just plugging up your ears now, and saying "nyah, nyah."
There is no deep state.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
As much as I don't like Trump he is what we needed. One reason he was elected was to blow up the system, and it has been blown up and exposed.
Most of us knew it was corrupt but we're now seeing how corrupt it was.
Samantha Power denies serial unmasking
It has been reported that Samantha Power, while serving as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, requested or initiated a request for more than 260 unmaskings of Americans whose conversations were picked up during surveillance. But today, according to Rep. Trey Gowdy, Power denied making anything close to that number of unmasking requests.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/samantha-power-denies-serial-unmasking.php
she denies the unmasking but SOMEBODY did it!
Ok Mr. Democrat whatever you say. I got no use for closed minds. Your objection is not about intelligence
it's about Comey's decisions as investigator/prosecutor
we're shining some light on the cockroaches, but they scatter and hide and partisans aren't interested.
but we are making progress - much more then a year ago
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I'm not a Democrat, and my mind isn't closed. I'm just logical about what a conspiracy like the one you keep talking about would involve - it's not possible to orchestrate it and keep it secret for any length of time. That is simply a fact.
this is not a big conspiracy..it's a few individuals in leadership.
The open question is what did the Obama folks ( like power) have to do with it.
Look at the Strzok/Page texts . Look at Mccabes office meeting on insurance policies
Brennan leaking to CNN -and Clappers urging Comey to brief Trump making the news hook.
They don't even have to coordinate (conspire) on lots; of this -they just gotta have motivations which we've seen
bloomberg is LW hacks, but you posted on Rice, not Power