Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Anatta - Trump has already called for more wars than McCain has in his whole life. And you give him tons of leeway, because he's your guy and "they're just tweets."
John McShame is a real pill
- Thread starter Stretch
- Start date
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Oh, Zappacrite...
Well, Zappacrite? I condemned ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.
Now, condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, own up to your own double standard, and admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".
Well, Zappacrite? I condemned ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.
Now, condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, own up to your own double standard, and admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".
Medicade expansion is adding to the debt. CBO scores all talk about adding to the deficit
I realize that is no biggie to you, but since Obama now has the debt > the GDP it should be.
SP was indeed the goal of the ACA..i was there. I distinctly remember it being called a "transition"
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Looks like Wiperess has no rejoinder for Stretch.
Which honestly should come as no surprise. Nice to see you back!
Syria
Fighting words: “Providing military assistance to the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups is necessary, but at this late hour, that alone will not be sufficient to stop the slaughter and save innocent lives. The only realistic way to do so is with foreign air power.”
What he wanted: Airstrikes, culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? TBD.
Angry McCains: Five
IRAQ (part II)
Fighting words: “Leaders always have choices, and history teaches that hard choices deferred—appeasing Hitler, choosing not to deter Saddam Hussein in 1990, failing to act sooner against Al Qaeda—often bring about the very circumstances we wished to avoid by deferring action, requiring us to react in freedom’s defense. America’s leaders today have a choice. It will determine whether our people live in fear behind walls that have already been breached, as our enemies plan our defeat in time we have given them to do it.”
What he wanted: Ground war culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? See above.
Angry McCains: Five
AFGHANISTAN
Fighting words: “We should make an immediate statement of our resolve that we no longer intend to tolerate sanction given to our enemies by any nation…Should the Taliban refuse our demand, then they must know that they will be treated as allies of our enemy, and, thus, are themselves our enemies, and will suffer much for their allegiance.”
What he wanted: Osama bin Laden’s head, at any cost.
What was it good for? Ground war culminating in regime change (ongoing).
Angry McCains: Five
LIBYA
Fighting words: “I would arm, train, equip, both from without and from within, forces that would eventually overthrow the governments and install free and democratically-elected governments” (2000). “t does take time, as it did during the period of the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But we were able to provide them with some weapons and wherewithal to cause the Russians to leave Afghanistan. So we can do it” (2012).
What he wanted: Regime change.
What was it good for? Regime change (12 years—and one ill-considered tweet) later.
Angry McCains: Five
Kosovo
Fighting words: “The best course for us, NATO, Kosovo, Russia and even Serbia is to begin fighting this war as if it were a war, with huge stakes involved, instead of some strange interlude between peace initiatives…To that end, we should commence today to mobilize infantry and armored divisions for a possible ground war in Kosovo.”
What he wanted: Ground war culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? Airstrikes.
Angry McCains: Four
Русский агент
Путин - мl
I'll just leave this here to remind the liberals of just one episode in Senator McCain's past.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
You're a true leftist dumbfuck.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
You haven't proven your claim, Zappacrite. Do you need me to remind you exactly what you claimed again?
I notice that you don't seem eager to learn who runs the blog site you cited. I think I know why.
Yeah, that's what I thought...
This is CLASSIC YurTroll stupidity.
Devolve the discussion further and further down into the minutae until no one can keep track.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
What point am I defending, Zappacrite? Name it. I dare you.
You aren't.
You've once again resorted to petty name calling.
It's what you do when you can't defend your point.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Syria
Fighting words: “Providing military assistance to the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups is necessary, but at this late hour, that alone will not be sufficient to stop the slaughter and save innocent lives. The only realistic way to do so is with foreign air power.”
What he wanted: Airstrikes, culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? TBD.
Angry McCains: Five
IRAQ (part II)
Fighting words: “Leaders always have choices, and history teaches that hard choices deferred—appeasing Hitler, choosing not to deter Saddam Hussein in 1990, failing to act sooner against Al Qaeda—often bring about the very circumstances we wished to avoid by deferring action, requiring us to react in freedom’s defense. America’s leaders today have a choice. It will determine whether our people live in fear behind walls that have already been breached, as our enemies plan our defeat in time we have given them to do it.”
What he wanted: Ground war culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? See above.
Angry McCains: Five
AFGHANISTAN
Fighting words: “We should make an immediate statement of our resolve that we no longer intend to tolerate sanction given to our enemies by any nation…Should the Taliban refuse our demand, then they must know that they will be treated as allies of our enemy, and, thus, are themselves our enemies, and will suffer much for their allegiance.”
What he wanted: Osama bin Laden’s head, at any cost.
What was it good for? Ground war culminating in regime change (ongoing).
Angry McCains: Five
LIBYA
Fighting words: “I would arm, train, equip, both from without and from within, forces that would eventually overthrow the governments and install free and democratically-elected governments” (2000). “t does take time, as it did during the period of the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. But we were able to provide them with some weapons and wherewithal to cause the Russians to leave Afghanistan. So we can do it” (2012).
What he wanted: Regime change.
What was it good for? Regime change (12 years—and one ill-considered tweet) later.
Angry McCains: Five
Kosovo
Fighting words: “The best course for us, NATO, Kosovo, Russia and even Serbia is to begin fighting this war as if it were a war, with huge stakes involved, instead of some strange interlude between peace initiatives…To that end, we should commence today to mobilize infantry and armored divisions for a possible ground war in Kosovo.”
What he wanted: Ground war culminating in regime change.
What was it good for? Airstrikes.
Angry McCains: Four
You're such a hypocrite, and an exaggerator. Not a lot of "we need to invade" up there, and there were certainly conflicts like Afghanistan that had almost universal support.
Meanwhile, Trump says he'd use the military when Iran has little motorboats cruising near our carriers, or when Russia flies low over a carrier, and goes all "fire and fury" at the smallest provocation. He even said he wouldn't rule out nukes in Europe.
Any gripes from annata? Nooope.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Trying to obscure the fact that you made a claim and can't prove it, I see.
Now, let's see if you're a man of your word.
Well, Zappacrite? I condemned ILA and noise for wishing death on another human being.
Now, condemn Christiecrite for her hypocrisy, own up to your own double standard, and admit that you can't prove that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin".
You don't FIX something as poorly thought out and moronic as Obamacare. You kill it and put it out of its misery.
The same way Obamacare was passed?
You really are too stupid for words.
Liberals/Democrats when they are in power; pass things without any inclusion of the minority party.
Liberals/Democrats when they are out of power; WE NEED BIPARTISANSHIP!
Morons.
