You really perplex me, on the one hand you seem to want to judge the case based on the evidence but then throw all impartiality out the window by calling Martin a criminal based on what amounts to little more more than your subjective opinion.
Well, for starters, there is ample amount of evidence that trayvon acted criminally. In zimmerman's case, there isn't.
One thing I would like to know is why didn't he use CS or pepper spray rather than a gun? Are you going to tell me that these neighbourhood watch characters don't carry it?
I dont know, (not being factious) did he have pepper spray? Frankly, if I am getting beat on by a criminal, I am going for my gun every time. It's the safest route.