Zimmerman ADMITS to following Martin

Maybe you're just being a little to civil Zappa.


How does one be "to civil"? Oh wait, you meant "too civil" didn't you? Still, I don't think you can be too civil.

That is if you want to actually discuss something....
 
According to a couple posters on these boards, there's been NO ADMISSION by Zimmerman that he followed Martin at any time.

I was merely pointing out they were wrong...
I paid pretty close attention to the first half dozen zimmerman threads and I don't remember anyone saying that zimmerman never followed martin. quite a few of us said that zimmerman didn't STALK martin, but following and stalking are most certainly two different things.
 
I judge anyone who never met a shooter he didn't love...unless that shooter was holding a badge.
nor did you ever meet anyone with a gun that you didn't outright hate and despise, so again you're nothing but a judgmental idiot.

Your rabid and sustained defense of Zimmerman makes you more transparent than you'll ever know. But I think he's going to get what's coming to him. I hope you enjoy it.

to date, there has been zero evidence of the elements needed for 2nd degree murder, so i hope you're not too disappointed later.
 
Ol' Georgie's gonna be seeing a lot of Tyrone's chiquita banana iykwim...I hear they like junk in the trunk and Georgie's got a steamer!
so you condone prison rape? how about some extra curricular punishment like broken bones every month? maybe we should turn NYC in to a supermax prison like the movie? would that turn you on?
 
IMO at this point anyone who believes this guy is either a rabid supporter of stand your ground (the kind who is terrified of their own shadows and too afraid to shower without their gun) or a racist.
more judgmental crap from your idiot mind. keep showing your retard colors darla. it's awesome.
 
That is merely Martin DEFENDING HIMSELF from the person he saw initiating a conflict by following him without provocation.
so you're saying that if I feel threatened by somebody following me around the block, I can turn and knock the shit out of him/her no matter if they were just walking the same way?
 
I paid pretty close attention to the first half dozen zimmerman threads and I don't remember anyone saying that zimmerman never followed martin. quite a few of us said that zimmerman didn't STALK martin, but following and stalking are most certainly two different things.

Then you weren't paying that close attention, because it was stated, and it was USF.
 
so you condone prison rape? how about some extra curricular punishment like broken bones every month? maybe we should turn NYC in to a supermax prison like the movie? would that turn you on?

how about answering the question howey? unless 'groaning' my post is your admission of your desire for brutality.
 
Then you weren't paying that close attention, because it was stated, and it was USF.
like I pay that close attention to USFs posts... :rolleyes: and if ONE person stating an obvious falsehood marks the rest of the board, you're all in a world of shit depending on darlas mood on any particular day.
 
I paid pretty close attention to the first half dozen zimmerman threads and I don't remember anyone saying that zimmerman never followed martin. quite a few of us said that zimmerman didn't STALK martin, but following and stalking are most certainly two different things.

Note also that there's a big difference between saying Zimmerman never followed Martian and saying there's been NO ADMISSION by Zimmerman that he followed Martin.
 
Note also that there's a big difference between saying Zimmerman never followed Martian and saying there's been NO ADMISSION by Zimmerman that he followed Martin.


My personal opinion is that the defense isn't going to hinge on whether or not Z got out of his car to keep tabs on M. But rather the fact that M circled back to Z and assaulted him.
 
Yawn...more taunts and name calling?

It's just more "civil" debate from the whiner Yurt...and a big THANKS for contributing to the debate!

and of course you don't actual respond to my debate points. nope....instead the board's biggest whiner who has no problem dishing out insults on a daily basis runs from the debate and cries about insults.

fucking baby.

one more time:

it was the later point that is of contention. further, following someone does not necessarily mean he initiated anything.
 
So what you're saying is he was following him but he wasn't following him? :rofl2:

and you think i have a reading comprehension issue. what part of "later point" do you not understand? what part of "followed him at that point" do you not understand.

he informed the 911 operator that he was following him at one point. then he allegedly stopped and was headed back to his car. so him admitting this is old news, except to hacks like you and zappa.
 
My personal opinion is that the defense isn't going to hinge on whether or not Z got out of his car to keep tabs on M. But rather the fact that M circled back to Z and assaulted him.

That's not a fact. That's what known liar Zimmerman says. The other guy is dead. So STFU with your "facts". God you people are so full of shit.
 
Back
Top