Zelenskyy Blasts Bungling Biden, Says Support From US Too Little, Too late
- Thread starter Legion
- Start date
Socialist/communist elections are routinely that way. Its kind of a requirement.
Wow, how desperate is that, “copy” now has to go directly to the RNC to find his silly copy and paste attacks on Biden, via a tweet no less
Poor poor “copy and paste,” he’s doing his best to help Vladimir but just ain’t cutting it
If Only Putin Had Invaded Mexico
As World War III looms in Europe, we must put narrow partisan differences aside and tap the brain power of the greatest minds among us. It is time for the bungling Biden White Louse to call upon ... Jared!
Speaking of the best and the brightest, our foreign policy mandarins must have felt like it was Christmas Day when a senile dementia patient became president.
Finally! No meddling politicians to get in the way of our beautifully designed plans worked out at the Council on Foreign Relations. Although Joseph R. Biden is technically, in a strictly legal sense, "resident," it's progressives running his domestic policy, and think-tank geniuses running his foreign policy.
Things are going great!
Let's review the consistent position on Russia from our ruling class, informed by the whiz kids of international affairs.
OBAMA ERA, 2009:
Throughout Obama's "reset" of the relationship with Russia -- which had "deteriorated alarmingly" under President Bush, according to the failing New York Times -- foreign policy experts were thrilled to have an American leader finally acknowledging the end of the Cold War.
A Times article cheerfully reported that "Obama has resolved not to let the ghosts of the 20th century get in the way of his goals in the 21st." The paper editorialized, "We are relieved that Washington and Moscow are talking about cooperation."
In a May 20, 2009, column titled "Cold War Leftovers," Stephen Sestanovich expressed delight that "the cold war really is over." More than two years later, on Oct. 28, 2011, British historian Geoffrey Wheatcroft informed Times readers: "Putin's Russia, though obnoxious enough, scarcely represents a strategic threat."
Evincing (see what she did there?) our shared humanity, the Russkies loved Obama.
"After relations with the United States curdled in the final years of President George W. Bush's tenure," the Times cooed, "many people [in Russia] were relieved by Mr. Obama's election." Indeed, "Russia's leaders ... could not say enough good things about President Obama." Sting was right: The Russians DO love their children, too!
Obama didn't sanction Russia for placing spies on U.S. soil, and barely did for annexing Crimea. Peace reigned.
More to come from acerbic Ann.
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2022/03/03/if-only-putin-had-invaded-mexico-n2604081
As World War III looms in Europe, we must put narrow partisan differences aside and tap the brain power of the greatest minds among us. It is time for the bungling Biden White Louse to call upon ... Jared!
Speaking of the best and the brightest, our foreign policy mandarins must have felt like it was Christmas Day when a senile dementia patient became president.
Finally! No meddling politicians to get in the way of our beautifully designed plans worked out at the Council on Foreign Relations. Although Joseph R. Biden is technically, in a strictly legal sense, "resident," it's progressives running his domestic policy, and think-tank geniuses running his foreign policy.
Things are going great!
Let's review the consistent position on Russia from our ruling class, informed by the whiz kids of international affairs.
OBAMA ERA, 2009:
Throughout Obama's "reset" of the relationship with Russia -- which had "deteriorated alarmingly" under President Bush, according to the failing New York Times -- foreign policy experts were thrilled to have an American leader finally acknowledging the end of the Cold War.
A Times article cheerfully reported that "Obama has resolved not to let the ghosts of the 20th century get in the way of his goals in the 21st." The paper editorialized, "We are relieved that Washington and Moscow are talking about cooperation."
In a May 20, 2009, column titled "Cold War Leftovers," Stephen Sestanovich expressed delight that "the cold war really is over." More than two years later, on Oct. 28, 2011, British historian Geoffrey Wheatcroft informed Times readers: "Putin's Russia, though obnoxious enough, scarcely represents a strategic threat."
Evincing (see what she did there?) our shared humanity, the Russkies loved Obama.
"After relations with the United States curdled in the final years of President George W. Bush's tenure," the Times cooed, "many people [in Russia] were relieved by Mr. Obama's election." Indeed, "Russia's leaders ... could not say enough good things about President Obama." Sting was right: The Russians DO love their children, too!
Obama didn't sanction Russia for placing spies on U.S. soil, and barely did for annexing Crimea. Peace reigned.
More to come from acerbic Ann.
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2022/03/03/if-only-putin-had-invaded-mexico-n2604081
Well, there you go. The DEMOCRATS just followed their natural inclinations.
Looks like Princess Nan has been told we are not interested in that satellite country any more.
Bungling Biden blabbed to Xi, who told Putin.
The failing New York Times now admits that the bungling Biden regime held "a half-dozen meetings” at which the United States gave intelligence about Russia’s plans for war to senior Red Chinese officials.
Instead of taking action out in the open, bungling Biden secretly begged his paymasters in Beijing to pressure Putin. They laughed in his face.
Days after bungling Biden spoke to Mr. Xi in a video summit on Nov. 15, senior American officials presented intelligence on the Russian troop buildup around Ukraine to senior Chinese officials to try to get them to persuade Mr. Putin to stand down. The Americans talked to Qin Gang, the Chinese ambassador in Washington, and to Wang Yi, the foreign minister. Beijing shared the information with Moscow. U.S. officials acknowledged that Mr. Putin’s relationship with Mr. Xi was important.
Moscow and Beijing issued a 5,000-word statement declaring that their partnership had “no limits,” denouncing NATO enlargement and asserting that they would establish a new global order with true democracy.
The intelligence on the exchange between the Chinese and Russian officials was classified. Senior officials in the United States passed it around. Officials briefed on the intelligence declined to give further details. Representative Mike Gallagher, Republican of Wisconsin and a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was not familiar with the intelligence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/02/us/politics/russia-ukraine-china.html
The failing New York Times now admits that the bungling Biden regime held "a half-dozen meetings” at which the United States gave intelligence about Russia’s plans for war to senior Red Chinese officials.
Instead of taking action out in the open, bungling Biden secretly begged his paymasters in Beijing to pressure Putin. They laughed in his face.
Days after bungling Biden spoke to Mr. Xi in a video summit on Nov. 15, senior American officials presented intelligence on the Russian troop buildup around Ukraine to senior Chinese officials to try to get them to persuade Mr. Putin to stand down. The Americans talked to Qin Gang, the Chinese ambassador in Washington, and to Wang Yi, the foreign minister. Beijing shared the information with Moscow. U.S. officials acknowledged that Mr. Putin’s relationship with Mr. Xi was important.
Moscow and Beijing issued a 5,000-word statement declaring that their partnership had “no limits,” denouncing NATO enlargement and asserting that they would establish a new global order with true democracy.
The intelligence on the exchange between the Chinese and Russian officials was classified. Senior officials in the United States passed it around. Officials briefed on the intelligence declined to give further details. Representative Mike Gallagher, Republican of Wisconsin and a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was not familiar with the intelligence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/02/us/politics/russia-ukraine-china.html
I suspect that she and her pet man Paul will benefit bigly from the "humanitarian aid" package that the taxpayers will have to pay for when she and Cryin' Chuck come back to work on Monday. She probably needed a couple of days to set up some insider trades.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
There is little to no blasting, that was a lie. We don't need you encouraging him. By the way, it's not blasting Biden that gets scorn, it's praising Putin to take a swipe at Biden that is taboo.
Last edited:
Ah... going to be a whole lotta phone calls this weekend to see who gets invited to the gravy train.
floridafan
Verified User
FUCKSKI JOESKI BIDENSKI!
Zelenkskyy said in a televised address, “I want to thank the countries that are helping with weapons, but it’s too late.”
https://nypost.com/2022/03/03/volodymyr-zelensky-says-global-support-for-ukraine-came-too-late/
How quickly you choose to forget when Donald Trump held up hundreds of millions of dollars of aid to this country until such time as they did what he wanted.
I suspect that you're correct.
Probably some new DEMOCRAT-run "Ukrainian relief foundations" need to be set up over the weekend (registered in Delaware, of course) so that tax-free donations can benefit you-know-who.
floridafan
Verified User
Sounds like you are referring to the Trump foundation, may it Rest In Peace.
Noking
Fight authoritarianism support Noking
FUCKSKI JOESKI BIDENSKI!
Zelenkskyy said in a televised address, “I want to thank the countries that are helping with weapons, but it’s too late.”
https://nypost.com/2022/03/03/volodymyr-zelensky-says-global-support-for-ukraine-came-too-late/
Leprosy, isn't this what you wanted to hear, seeing that you're cheering for Putin.
AFTER THE ELECTION, I'LL HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY
OBAMA ERA, 2012:
When Mitt Romney came along and described Russia as our "No. 1 geopolitical foe" in 2012, the left laughed itself silly.
Ridiculing Romney in an editorial titled "The Never-Ending Cold War," the failing New York Times said his remark revealed "either a shocking lack of knowledge about international affairs or just craven politics."
The BBC cited "experts" who said Romney's statements on Russia reflected "his lack of experience in foreign policy."
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell "proved" Romney was wrong with a video clip of Andrea Mitchell stating: "Russia is not the greatest foreign policy challenge." Enough said!
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow couldn't contain her hilarity over the Republican National Convention's offering "an extra bonus of threatening Russia."
In a debate, Obama responded to Romney, "The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back." To hoots of laughter at the DEMOCRAT National Convention, he accused Romney of being "stuck in a Cold War mind warp."
Then John Kerry joked, "Folks, Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from Alaska. Mitt Romney talks like he's only seen Russia by watching 'Rocky IV.'"
https://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2022/03/03/if-only-putin-had-invaded-mexico-n2604081?utm_campaign=rightrailsticky3