Yakuda
Verified User
You did not answer my question...
You don't like the answer. Not the same.
You did not answer my question...
You don't like the answer. Not the same.
Run away, run. Its hard when you get backed into a corner and have to answer is you support Trumps crimes or not. Its a difficult week for you.
Run away, run. Its hard when you get backed into a corner and have to answer is you support Trumps crimes or not. Its a difficult week for you.
We're you unconscious during all that? Once again Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you are?
Same question back at you.
Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you?
Trump had his own AG, his own DOJ head, his own FBI head, and a SC he picked the balance of power on and he ran on 'locking Hilary up'.
His term was an exercise of the legitimate weaponization of gov't by repobliclowns, to engage in witch hunts, as they were desperate to charge Dem with crimes.
So unless they were all stupid why do you think they did not charge Hillary, the most hated person in GOP circles, if they thought a prosecution would endure?
Do you same people want Trump locked up for having top secret info in boxes at Mar-A-lago?
Same question back at you.
Why do you think everyone is as stupid as you?
Trump had his own AG, his own DOJ head, his own FBI head, and a SC he picked the balance of power on and he ran on 'locking Hilary up'.
His term was an exercise of the legitimate weaponization of gov't by repobliclowns, to engage in witch hunts, as they were desperate to charge Dem with crimes.
So unless they were all stupid why do you think they did not charge Hillary, the most hated person in GOP circles, if they thought a prosecution would endure?

she wasn't the president.
True. What's also true is it doesn't matter. A security violation is still a security violation. Trump's own words on the tape is a confession.
It’s a difficult week for you with your illiterate posts.
Spend 20 bucks on an English grammar book.
and trump committed none.
Care to wager on that, Fredo, or do you lack the courage of your convictions?
who did they witch hunt?
Nobody.
the trump administration put the people's business first.
Unlike you, I'm not a lawyer so I'll have to wait for the court to decide.the president can declassify anything personally FOR RELEASE BY HIMSELF, without paperwork.
Trumps papers were defacto declassified for him when he took them, just by HIM AS PRESIDENT taking them.
Im sorry you're so stupid.
-Durham investigation. At over 4 years almost double the length of Mueller and 8 times the length of Jack Smith. Despite that no witches found by Durham and a long list of witches found by Mueller and numerous more certainly coming out Smith one.
- Benghazi investigations by a stream of GOP committees. - Witches hunted. None found.
- IRS investigations by numerous GOP committees. - Witches hunted. None found.
- Fast & Furious investigations by GOP. Witches hunted. None found.
Lots more if you need them. All nothing burgers. No witches.
Meanwhile
![]()
Look at all the witches found. Boatloads and boatloads of witches and more to come.
the president can declassify anything personally FOR RELEASE BY HIMSELF, without paperwork.
Trumps papers were defacto declassified for him when he took them, just by HIM AS PRESIDENT taking them.
Im sorry you're so stupid.
False.
Trump has the POWER to declassify anything he wants but there is a REQUIRED process beyond him just taking it, or saying 'it is declassified' or tweeting 'it is declassified'.
It is Trumps own White House, under his direction who went to Court to establish and PROVE Trumps words or writing alone WITHOUT the REQUIRED follow thru of the process of him instructing the departments to follow thru and declassify them, does not mean shit.
Trump sent Mark Meadows in to Court and WH lawyers in to court, 3 times when he said on a TV interview or in Twitter 'I declassified the following doc's' and then the Media immediately said 'great, we now present this FOIA request and want to view them'. The Trump team argument that won in court in all 3 instances below, was that Trumps words alone or writings alone (Twitter) do not declassify shit.
The judge ruled Trump's team was correct and WITHOUT the necessary follow thru by Trump to actually instruct the departments to declassify them, nothing was in fact declassified. Media denied.
It is Trumps own White House who prove that a lie based on precedent. Mark Meadows and Trumps own WH counsel, he sent in to court 3 times to say
- 'even when Trump says something is declassified or writes something is declassified, it is not UNLESS Trump and the WH actually follow thru and do the REQUIRED process to actually declassify them. If we do not, then all the material remains classified'.
Read that again and understand it. Trump had his own team go in to court 3 times to stop journalists getting material via FOIA that Trump had stated on TV or wrote on Twitter that he had declassified them. In all 3 court cases when the Trump admin did not want to hand that material over to the media, they argues successfully in court that Trumps words alone or writing alone was not in FACT sufficient to declassify them. And they WON in court all three times. The court found none of them were declassified and the media could not have them.
That is with clear statements from Trump they were declassified but with no process follow thru they were not.
- James Madison Project v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
- LEOPOLD et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al, No. 1:2019cv01278 - Document 86 (D.D.C. 2020)
- The New York Times, et al., v. Central Intelligence Agency
So stop spreading this BS lie, that Trumps own legal team and Chief of Staff, sent by Trump, 3 times to court already established is not enough to declassify.
Funny that Trump was the only POTUS stupid enough to do this, to require these precedent setting cases where this was litigated. No other POTUS was dumb enough to casually suggest things were declassified when they were not, thus allowing the Media a chance to get at them. Once again the best evidence against Trump, is Trump's own prior stupidity requiring this to be litigated. If those cases did not happen it would still be an open question, with no precedent yet set.

but no charges were ever made against anyone.
so.... no actual hunt, dumbass.