YES- the most most powerful hurricane ever recorded !

christiefan915 said:
He disgusts me. So sanctimonious and smarmy.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
God bless America said:
So you aren't anxious for everyone to make sacrifices in order save Mother Erf from duh eeeeevil pollution, just your enemies.

Now you understand why Trump shit on the Paris Accord. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

did you forget your god ordered you to take care of the earth


jesus is going to be mad at you
 
Micawber said:
Who knows, maybe there is some credible literature but you won't get reference from any of these fucking idiots. And of course this behavior from the same idiots who deny climate science in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence based consensus.

If Limbaugh doesn't sanction it, it doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
Arsehole!
dd6afdda3fbbecaae2c3b84a7c96f4e6.jpg
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
Adopting the exact consensus opinion of real climate science is not political correctness, nitwit. Climate science does not give a shit about climate science deniers, something it outwardly appears right wing internet frauds with no credentials or experience in climate science are wholly incapable of understanding.
Click to expand...
If waffle and bombast were Olympic sports you'd win gold every time.
 
Micawber said:
Do explain the false premise of climate science, dumbass. Greenhouse gasses do not trap heat? What? You are a retard.
Click to expand...

Here is a real climate scientist, widely acknowledged as the greatest living atmospheric physicist unlike charlatans like Michael Mann, James Hansen and Gavin Schmidt.

Prof. Richard Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons

by Judith Curry

Lindzen’s seminar last week that was presented at the House of Commons may be the most effective seminar he has given on Global Warming.

Slide 2:

Stated briefly, I will simply try to clarify what the debate over climate change is really about. It most certainly is not about whether climate is changing: it always is. It is not about whether CO2 is increasing: it clearly is. It is not about whether the increase in CO2, by itself, will lead to some warming: it should. The debate is simply over the matter of how much warming the increase in CO2 can lead to, and the connection of such warming to the innumerable claimed catastrophes. The evidence is that the increase in CO2 will lead to very little warming, and that the connection of this minimal warming (or even significant warming) to the purported catastrophes is also minimal. The arguments on which the catastrophic claims are made are extremely weak – and commonly acknowledged as such. They are sometimes overtly dishonest.
Click to expand...

https://judithcurry.com/2012/02/27/lindzens-seminar-at-the-house-of-commons/
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
Sure, if supply and demand works, a tax on products that create emissions with increase price and therefore decrease demand, thus reducing output of greenhouse gasses, thereby ameliorating the increase in global ocean temperatures thereby reducing the frequency and severity of storms. Schools out, moron.
Click to expand...
I am just wondering what would have happened in Florida if most of the people fleeing Irma had electric vehicles? Anybody want to answer that?
 
Corazón said:
I am just wondering what would have happened in Florida if most of the people fleeing Irma had electric vehicles? Anybody want to answer that?
Click to expand...

I remember when the Prius first came out, and an architect that I had been working with at the time ran out and bought one, then explained to be that he routinely rides the brake while he's on the highway in order to fill up the battery.

:truestory:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top