Yep, gay marriage will definitely ruin the institution of marriage </sarcasm>

USFREEDOM911 said:
Are you capable of concentrating on something other then your obsession with me and what I'm doing?

Isn't it about time for you to take another one of your "holiday trips" and embark on another of your child sex tours of Thialand or some such?
Click to expand...

What? You can post that, and every time I look, you're "groaning" my posts. You're the one obsessed. And you can't talk about anybody's "sex tours", when you work at one.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Fuck you Brit.
You don't know me any more then I know you; but you can take a flying fuck at a rolling dognut.
Click to expand...

Uh, when proselytizing and posturing about how much you know, it's imperative that you don't fuck up by mistaking one word ("then") for another one ("than").
You a laugh a minute. Dummie.
 
poet said:
What? You can post that, and every time I look, you're "groaning" my posts. You're the one obsessed. And you can't talk about anybody's "sex tours", when you work at one.
Click to expand...

Why do you keep bring up the "groan" situation, when you said repeatedly that it doesn't bother you?
Are you lying now, or were you lying then?

As to your comment regarding "sex tours"; well, once again you must be projecting your experiance from when you were incarcerated.
I'm not sure where you were confined; but it wasn't Arizona and more likely it was in one of those liberal states, where they condone and promote that kind of behavior.
 
poet said:
Uh, when proselytizing and posturing about how much you know, it's imperative that you don't fuck up by mistaking one word ("then") for another one ("than").
You a laugh a minute. Dummie.
Click to expand...

The FACT that all you have to occupy your time, is to follow me around and work as my spell checker; is highly amusing.
At least it keeps you out of the bath houses.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Fuck you Brit.
You don't know me any more then I know you; but you can take a flying fuck at a rolling dognut.
Click to expand...

Now, now, now, don't throw your toys out of your pram. As you are wont to say: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

BTW is a 'dognut' a cross between a doughnut and a hot dog? Strange tastes you little people have. But then again, you have so little to occupy such a tiny mind.

No, don't bother to reply. I'm sure you have better things to do. Shaving your palms?
 
Lowaicue said:
Now, now, now, don't throw your toys out of your pram. As you are wont to say: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

BTW is a 'dognut' a cross between a doughnut and a hot dog? Strange tastes you little people have. But then again, you have so little to occupy such a tiny mind.

No, don't bother to reply. I'm sure you have better things to do. Shaving your palms?
Click to expand...

You really need to get over yourself; because the only way you could take the piss out of someone, would be if you were on the receiving end of a golden shower.

You're just a pissed off old Brit; who can't get over that the fact that where once being British meant something other then being laughed at, as a bunch of used to be's.

But you keep that stiff upper lip, OK. :)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Why do you keep bring up the "groan" situation, when you said repeatedly that it doesn't bother you?
Are you lying now, or were you lying then?

As to your comment regarding "sex tours"; well, once again you must be projecting your experiance from when you were incarcerated.
I'm not sure where you were confined; but it wasn't Arizona and more likely it was in one of those liberal states, where they condone and promote that kind of behavior.
Click to expand...

Uh, can you prove I was incarcerated? Otherwise, that is slander, a criminal offense, punishable by law. (that you supposedly are bound to uphold). And if I was ever incarcerated, you have just violated the TOS by posting private and privileged information, which is the grounds for banning. So, name your poison. You're damned either way.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You really need to get over yourself; because the only way you could take the piss out of someone, would be if you were on the receiving end of a golden shower.

You're just a pissed off old Brit; who can't get over that the fact that where once being British meant something other then being laughed at, as a bunch of used to be's.

But you keep that stiff upper lip, OK. :)
Click to expand...


Who talks about something so disgusting as "golden showers", but a pervert. How do you know about them, unless it's activity you've engaged in?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Are you now asserting that all of the 50 milliion would adopt a child or children?
Click to expand...

I'm not asserting anything of the kind. I said India has "plenty" of people to keep their race alive if only those who could support a child had children. You asked how many constituted "plenty" and the answer is 50 million.
 
poet said:
Uh, can you prove I was incarcerated? Otherwise, that is slander, a criminal offense, punishable by law. (that you supposedly are bound to uphold). And if I was ever incarcerated, you have just violated the TOS by posting private and privileged information, which is the grounds for banning. So, name your poison. You're damned either way.
Click to expand...

Then choose your poison:
1. sue me bitch
or
2. have me banned

Well there is a third one and in that choice, you can kiss my ass; but I'm afraid that they've never get that shit eating grin off of your face.

So go for it, Mary. :)
 
poet said:
Who talks about something so disgusting as "golden showers", but a pervert. How do you know about them, unless it's activity you've engaged in?
Click to expand...

You really are naive, when it comes to what people know or understand.

The question is though; are you willfully naive, or is it a learning disability that you've been unable to overcome.
 
apple0154 said:
I'm not asserting anything of the kind. I said India has "plenty" of people to keep their race alive if only those who could support a child had children. You asked how many constituted "plenty" and the answer is 50 million.
Click to expand...

Ergo: you're stating that 50 million people, in India, would adopt.


There is much failure in you, my young apprentice.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then choose your poison:
1. sue me bitch
or
2. have me banned

Well there is a third one and in that choice, you can kiss my ass; but I'm afraid that they've never get that shit eating grin off of your face.

So go for it, Mary. :)
Click to expand...

Uh, you have yet to prove it...so, you're poised on slander. And I'm not afraid to call you on it. You're a liar. And that's not exactly what I'd do to your ass, given the chance.
Know what I mean, chili bean?
 
poet said:
Uh, you have yet to prove it...so, you're poised on slander. And I'm not afraid to call you on it. You're a liar. And that's not exactly what I'd do to your ass, given the chance.
Know what I mean, chili bean?
Click to expand...

Since you were the one that said you didn't have to prove anything; then the inverse is true and I'm not required to provide anything either.

If you're using this as a grounds to refer to me as a liar; then you have proven yourself to be a liar thrice over.
Once when you proclaimed your idea of my employment, again when you said you never lie, and then when you try to use your own habit of calling others liars.

You are whipped, like the family pig. :)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Since you were the one that said you didn't have to prove anything; then the inverse is true and I'm not required to provide anything either.

If you're using this as a grounds to refer to me as a liar; then you have proven yourself to be a liar thrice over.
Once when you proclaimed your idea of my employment, again when you said you never lie, and then when you try to use your own habit of calling others liars.

You are whipped, like the family pig. :)
Click to expand...


Darling, if we looked back through the threads....it was you that first attacked. You insulted, and then lied, not knowing anything about me, other than what I told you. The rest was speculation, on your part. Now for you to claim that I was incarcerated, while having no proof of such, is slander. I have publicly called out my accuser, and demanded that you produce evidence of your slanderous claim....since you cannot, and will not, under threat of violating the TOS and the proviso of Damocles, we can dismiss your accusation as "petty" and impotent retaliation for being publicly embarrassed by me, and others who support me. It's not rocket science.
You are, in fact and indeed "a liar", and have been shown as such, and not only by me.
Your profession, which you chose to share by posting to your profile is a matter of public record. I merely expressed an opinion about it. It pissed you off. You can flame, spit, twist and turn...I don't give a flying

You have never bested or whipped me in any of your posts...that you believe that you did, shows your psychosis. Seek professional help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top