Yellen sees no need to relax regulations

I have a very difficult time believing you subscribed to the FT Desh. Since you can't just copy and paste you may have to use your own words.
 
the link didnt work for me after I posted it

so I cant read it


they did write the title though
 
evince said:
the link didnt work for me after I posted it

so I cant read it


they did write the title though
Click to expand...


Typical deshtard. Posting links to shit she doesn't even read. This exposes her idiocy. Trying to pass herself off as smart when she is dumb as dog shit.

We know you didn't read it Deshtard.

Those of who are smart and consumers of information know how Financial Times works. It is a pay site. Sometimes they give you a teaser of an article to try to get you to buy a subscription, which we know you don't have. You should be embarrassed trying to pass this off
 
if was the same story I was blocked from commenting on


it is not right wing slander like the one linked to earlier by wack
 
evince said:
if was the same story I was blocked from commenting on


it is not right wing slander like the one linked to earlier by wack
Click to expand...

how the hell do you know if it's the same story if you can't read it?

And please do tell me what was right wing slander in the Reuters piece. It's slander to quote her?
 
evince said:
I didnt read it


I was banned from the thread remember asshole
Click to expand...

wait, so you are calling an article slanderous and right wing and you didn't read it???? Jesus Desh.

You are blocked from commenting on the thread. You can read the article
 
So let's review.

Deshtard starts a thread to talk about an article she didn't read as a response to a thread she was banned from and didn't read?

That makes perfect Deshtard sense if you think about it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top