Wynn blasts Obama

Oh, so out of control emotions, childish temper tantrums and CEO insecurities trump supply & demand? If the DEMAND were there in Vegas, Wynn would help dig a foundation for a new hotel with his fingernails.

If cry baby Wynn is afraid of President Obama, he'd be sitting in a corner sucking his thumb if FDR were in the White House, and he'd probably commit suicide after President Kennedy raked him over the coals...

Thanks for once again showing that you fail to comprehend economics. Tell us genius, if there were demand in Vegas (which there is) and Wynn wanted to build, what do you suppose he has to be concerned with in terms of project viability??? Do you know? What factors that just might have been mentioned in this thread might alter the viability of the project? Any clue?
 
'WHO says Wynn is not prioritising?' No one as far as I know. Indeed I said that that was exactly what he should be doing.
Is English a problem for you? Don't be embarrassed if it is. I will try to make my sentences a little more simple and type slower.

Then do tell us genius, why did YOU bring up prioritizing when we were discussing Vegas and Macau?

Note: typing slower is not going to effect the speed with which others read your thread moron.
 
Thanks for once again showing that you fail to comprehend economics. Tell us genius, if there were demand in Vegas (which there is) and Wynn wanted to build, what do you suppose he has to be concerned with in terms of project viability??? Do you know? What factors that just might have been mentioned in this thread might alter the viability of the project? Any clue?

If there is a demand for rooms, customers with disposable income willing to spend money in his hotels and casinos...NOTHING ELSE MATTERS you economic pea brain. The owner's emotions are not a factor UNLESS he is a cry baby like Wynn. If the turd wants to cut off his own dick, I have a great set of CUTCO knives I bought the wife.

You really are a MORON... a disciple of 'emote economics'...LMFAO!!!
 
Then do tell us genius, why did YOU bring up prioritizing when we were discussing Vegas and Macau?

Note: typing slower is not going to effect the speed with which others read your thread moron.

Because Wynn has interests in both places with Macau being considerably more profitable than Las Vegas. Therefore Mr Wynn, like any other business man decides which of the two investments should be his priority.
Someone made the point that Wynn criticised Obama. I said that Obama had little or nothing to do with the fact that most of his future business will come from Macau. (Do I really have to say all this again?). I said it was not because of any US government policy as much as the Chinese market is potentially 5 times the size of the US market.
Love your last point. Absolutely nothing gets past you, does it? Sorry, my sides are aching at the stupidity of that comment.

I've just realised, following the last comment, that you probably still have no idea what I am talking about.
 
rj.jpg


It seems Las Vegas hasn't done enough for Steve Wynn

John L. Smith
safe_image.php



Billionaire casino boss Steve Wynn says he's seriously considering moving his company's headquarters to Macau, where he plans to build a third gambling palace.

Really.

"I love it out here," Wynn told a Reuters reporter in Macau. "I'm going to bring it (the potential relocation) up at our board meeting in May. But I have to persuade my staff first."

Persuade his staff? That's a good one. It's hard to imagine any Wynn employee standing up to the boss.

When BusinessWeek reporters followed up, Wynn gave them an earful:

"I don't think the Las Vegas market at the moment beckons a large investment. The economic outlook in the United States, the policies of this administration, which do not favor job formation, do not encourage investment at all."

I've noticed no Nevada elected officials or Chamber of Commerce members have blasted Wynn for kicking the Las Vegas economy while it's down. Although they chose their words carefully, for fear of offending the generous benefactor and formidable enemy, Nevada politicians seemed surprised by Wynn's comments.

Not me.

Wynn's inability to self-edit grows each year. It makes me wonder whether anyone on his board of directors ever whispers anything but affirmation in his ear.

It's hardly the first time Wynn has bellowed about how hard it is to do business. When the British failed to license him in the early 1980s, he screamed politics. When New Jersey regulators scrutinized his casino customers, he called it oppressive. When the going gets tough in Las Vegas, he enthuses over Macau, an outpost with almost no history of regulation.

Wynn's comments are not only offensive, they're also metaphorically inaccurate. You see, he doesn't really do much business in the United States.

He does business in Las Vegas, where casino barons rule and are treated with gushing adulation usually reserved for pop stars and pinup girls. Wynn has had the best of it here for decades.

When Wynn owned the Golden Nugget, he decided he needed to expand toward Carson Street. City fathers helped him close it.

When Wynn fell in love with the idea of swimming with dolphins, a federally protected species, Nevada politicians rallied to help him make the laughable argument that dolphins at a casino were really about giving Clark County schoolchildren an educational opportunity.

When Wynn's taste in art translated into a growing personal collection worth many millions, the Legislature couldn't wait to please him by passing the infamous "Show Me the Monet" art tax break.

The list is long and newsprint is expensive. The bottom line: Las Vegas has been very good to Steve Wynn.

And Wynn's resorts have been among the finest in Las Vegas history. He has put to work thousands of people and carved out a reputation as a visionary in a business where someone who can read a wine list is treated as if he has discovered the Salk vaccine.

Wynn does business in Las Vegas, where Gaming Inc. pays a 6.75 percent tax rate and casino bosses bray like thunderstruck donkeys when someone reminds them Mississippi casinos pay 8 percent, Atlantic City casinos contribute 9, and Louisiana riverboats pay 21.5.

Wynn claims he is sincerely considering moving his headquarters to Macau, an Asian mob-infested smuggler's paradise ruled by a communist government where casinos pay an aggregate 40 percent tax rate.

This is the atmosphere he says is less oppressive than the United States?

It's no secret Wynn is making a major score in Macau, where the Chinese control the flow of travel visas and have the ability to nationalize the casino industry at any time. It's also obvious Las Vegas, which has given Wynn everything he has ever asked, is struggling. Unlike Wynn, most locals can't cut and run.

If after all Las Vegas has done for Steve Wynn isn't enough to engender his loyalty, then there's only one thing left to do.

Help the ingrate pack.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/it-seems-las-vegas-hasn-t-done-enough-for-steve-wynn-92037304.html
 
Because Wynn has interests in both places with Macau being considerably more profitable than Las Vegas. Therefore Mr Wynn, like any other business man decides which of the two investments should be his priority.
Someone made the point that Wynn criticised Obama. I said that Obama had little or nothing to do with the fact that most of his future business will come from Macau. (Do I really have to say all this again?). I said it was not because of any US government policy as much as the Chinese market is potentially 5 times the size of the US market.
Love your last point. Absolutely nothing gets past you, does it? Sorry, my sides are aching at the stupidity of that comment.

I've just realised, following the last comment, that you probably still have no idea what I am talking about.

Yes, you did say all of the above before. What I told you is that you are wrong. He DOES NOT HAVE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE TWO LOCATIONS. HIS DESIRE IS TO BUILD MORE IN BOTH LOCATIONS. HE SEES THE OPPORTUNITY THAT BOTH PRESENT. Yes, Macau has the higher growth potential as it is in its infancy relative to Vegas. But that does not alter the FACT that Wynn wants to take advantage of the Vegas market right now, but is afraid of the policies that Obama is presenting/implementing and how that will affect the economic viability of the Vegas project.

Were you able to grasp that FACT this time? Do I need to explain it to you again?

Wynn understands the gains that can be made in Macau. You continue to pretend it is an either or situation. It is not. Wynn stated clearly on the conference call that he wanted to expand in both locations.

But again... since you are so unbelievably thick.... HE HAS THE CAPITAL TO INVEST IN BOTH LOCATIONS AND WISHES TO DO SO.
 
Yes, you did say all of the above before. What I told you is that you are wrong. He DOES NOT HAVE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE TWO LOCATIONS. HIS DESIRE IS TO BUILD MORE IN BOTH LOCATIONS. HE SEES THE OPPORTUNITY THAT BOTH PRESENT. Yes, Macau has the higher growth potential as it is in its infancy relative to Vegas. But that does not alter the FACT that Wynn wants to take advantage of the Vegas market right now, but is afraid of the policies that Obama is presenting/implementing and how that will affect the economic viability of the Vegas project.

Were you able to grasp that FACT this time? Do I need to explain it to you again?

Wynn understands the gains that can be made in Macau. You continue to pretend it is an either or situation. It is not. Wynn stated clearly on the conference call that he wanted to expand in both locations.

But again... since you are so unbelievably thick.... HE HAS THE CAPITAL TO INVEST IN BOTH LOCATIONS AND WISHES TO DO SO.


If Wynn thought he could make money by building in Vegas he'd do it. He's throwing a hissy fit because he wants the government to cut him a deal on repatriating all that cash he is making in China. That's the long and short of it.

And I think it's hilarious that Wynn bitches about the onerousness of the US government while praising the governments of China and Singapore. Think about that. Democracy is apparently too messy for him.
 
If Wynn thought he could make money by building in Vegas he'd do it. He's throwing a hissy fit because he wants the government to cut him a deal on repatriating all that cash he is making in China. That's the long and short of it.

Right Dung... because the tax policies/health care issues/inflation.... yeah, none of those affect economic viability of a project... right?
 
Right Dung... because the tax policies/health care issues/inflation.... yeah, none of those affect economic viability of a project... right?


You know what really impacts the viability of a project? Lack of demand. Do you think there is really a lot of pent up demand for high-end casino development in Las Vegas under present economic conditions?
 
You know what really impacts the viability of a project? Lack of demand. Do you think there is really a lot of pent up demand for high-end casino development in Las Vegas under present economic conditions?

You DO understand that they can't build a casino overnight.... don't you?

You DO understand that the real estate market in Vegas is severely depressed.... don't you?
 
If Wynn thought he could make money by building in Vegas he'd do it. He's throwing a hissy fit because he wants the government to cut him a deal on repatriating all that cash he is making in China. That's the long and short of it.

And I think it's hilarious that Wynn bitches about the onerousness of the US government while praising the governments of China and Singapore. Think about that. Democracy is apparently too messy for him.

Wynn's inability to self-edit grows each year. It makes me wonder whether anyone on his board of directors ever whispers anything but affirmation in his ear.

It's hardly the first time Wynn has bellowed about how hard it is to do business. When the British failed to license him in the early 1980s, he screamed politics. When New Jersey regulators scrutinized his casino customers, he called it oppressive. When the going gets tough in Las Vegas, he enthuses over Macau, an outpost with almost no history of regulation.

Wynn's comments are not only offensive, they're also metaphorically inaccurate. You see, he doesn't really do much business in the United States.

He does business in Las Vegas, where casino barons rule and are treated with gushing adulation usually reserved for pop stars and pinup girls. Wynn has had the best of it here for decades.

When Wynn owned the Golden Nugget, he decided he needed to expand toward Carson Street. City fathers helped him close it.

When Wynn fell in love with the idea of swimming with dolphins, a federally protected species, Nevada politicians rallied to help him make the laughable argument that dolphins at a casino were really about giving Clark County schoolchildren an educational opportunity.

When Wynn's taste in art translated into a growing personal collection worth many millions, the Legislature couldn't wait to please him by passing the infamous "Show Me the Monet" art tax break.

The list is long and newsprint is expensive. The bottom line: Las Vegas has been very good to Steve Wynn.

And Wynn's resorts have been among the finest in Las Vegas history. He has put to work thousands of people and carved out a reputation as a visionary in a business where someone who can read a wine list is treated as if he has discovered the Salk vaccine.

Wynn does business in Las Vegas, where Gaming Inc. pays a 6.75 percent tax rate and casino bosses bray like thunderstruck donkeys when someone reminds them Mississippi casinos pay 8 percent, Atlantic City casinos contribute 9, and Louisiana riverboats pay 21.5.

Wynn claims he is sincerely considering moving his headquarters to Macau, an Asian mob-infested smuggler's paradise ruled by a communist government where casinos pay an aggregate 40 percent tax rate.

This is the atmosphere he says is less oppressive than the United States?
 
Wynn's inability to self-edit grows each year. It makes me wonder whether anyone on his board of directors ever whispers anything but affirmation in his ear.

It's hardly the first time Wynn has bellowed about how hard it is to do business. When the British failed to license him in the early 1980s, he screamed politics. When New Jersey regulators scrutinized his casino customers, he called it oppressive. When the going gets tough in Las Vegas, he enthuses over Macau, an outpost with almost no history of regulation.

Wynn's comments are not only offensive, they're also metaphorically inaccurate. You see, he doesn't really do much business in the United States.

He does business in Las Vegas, where casino barons rule and are treated with gushing adulation usually reserved for pop stars and pinup girls. Wynn has had the best of it here for decades.

When Wynn owned the Golden Nugget, he decided he needed to expand toward Carson Street. City fathers helped him close it.

When Wynn fell in love with the idea of swimming with dolphins, a federally protected species, Nevada politicians rallied to help him make the laughable argument that dolphins at a casino were really about giving Clark County schoolchildren an educational opportunity.

When Wynn's taste in art translated into a growing personal collection worth many millions, the Legislature couldn't wait to please him by passing the infamous "Show Me the Monet" art tax break.

The list is long and newsprint is expensive. The bottom line: Las Vegas has been very good to Steve Wynn.

And Wynn's resorts have been among the finest in Las Vegas history. He has put to work thousands of people and carved out a reputation as a visionary in a business where someone who can read a wine list is treated as if he has discovered the Salk vaccine.

Wynn does business in Las Vegas, where Gaming Inc. pays a 6.75 percent tax rate and casino bosses bray like thunderstruck donkeys when someone reminds them Mississippi casinos pay 8 percent, Atlantic City casinos contribute 9, and Louisiana riverboats pay 21.5.

Wynn claims he is sincerely considering moving his headquarters to Macau, an Asian mob-infested smuggler's paradise ruled by a communist government where casinos pay an aggregate 40 percent tax rate.

This is the atmosphere he says is less oppressive than the United States?

When you use other peoples work, you are supposed to cite it.
 
What Obama has proposed is a return to Clinton-era levels of taxation on the wealthiest Americans.




That would presumably cost Wynn some money -- according to Forbes.com, Wynn is the 512th richest American, with a net worth of $2.3 billion.




If we want to talk redistribution, what we've seen over the last three decades has been a remarkable redistribution of wealth from the lower and middle class to people like Wynn.




With federal taxes, measured as a percentage of GDP, at 60-year lows, is it really all that "socialist" to recommend a return to the tax rates of the go-go '90s?




A period, incidentally, in which Wynn made an awful lot of money.




As for the debt ceiling -- if Wynn has any suggestions for how Obama might be able to "wrangle" House Republicans, I'm sure he'd be all ears.




But since it's pretty clear that House Republican leaders can't even control their own caucus, it is rather difficult to see how Obama can bend them to his will.




It must be frustrating to be a casino and resort operator in Nevada.




The state has suffered terribly from the double whammy of the housing meltdown and the collapse in leisure spending that accompanied the worst recession in 70 years.




When you've lost your house and your job, a weekend of gambling and high living in Las Vegas isn't quite as attractive anymore.




My guess is that Wynn's unwillingness to plow cash into new resort developments has much more to do with a lack of consumer demand than with ObamaCare or Dodd-Frank, or anything else that the president has even tangentially been involved with.






Luckily for Wynn, he doesn't have to depend on Nevada to make a buck.




Wynn Resorts is a major player in Macau, where profits are generated by sucking in cash from Chinese gamblers.




And just listen to what Wynn has to say about China!

September will be our fifth anniversary in the People's Republic of China in Macau, and we love it there. We are so grateful to be part of that market and to be allowed to participate in that community. We find the political environment, the regulatory environment, the human resource environment that we're in to be absolutely delicious. Life is quite straightforward in China. The government is predictable. Our employees are eminently trainable. They're anxious to please. They have a fabulous attitude, whether they're local Macau people, mainland Chinese people, folks from the Philippines, they're just wonderful and all of that's come together to help us deliver the kind of product that we've always been delivering.


Anxious-to-please workers!




Is there a little resentment to be sensed here at the power of unions in Nevada -- one of the few remaining regions in the United States where organized labor still has some clout?




And how about that "absolutely delicious" political environment!




I wonder how many of the right-wing blogs that are passing around Wynn's "epic Obama rant" would even be allowed to operate in China?




It's just so easy, after all, to be straightforward when you have totalitarian political control -- no annoying independent unions or opposition parties that need to be "wrangled."




The Chinese Communist Party would know exactly what to do with the Tea Party.




Steve, chill out. Remember what you told Charlie Rose when you acknowledged that you had a problem with your "explosive temper"?



He got to this state of self awareness with the help of a friend, the Dalai Lama. "He says to me, 'I'll do an imitation, When you get angry, when you lose your temper, when you think that you shout and react in a poor way to other people, it is a result of a false sense of yourself, an inflated sense of yourself that is worthless,'" Wynn said.


Exactly.










http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/07/20/steve_wynn_anti_obama_rant/index.html
 
Back
Top