Wow, that global warming thang is a real bitch!

[Micawber]

I appreciate your emphasis on that detail.
But I believe the word you intended is "anthropogenic".

Carrion.

He shant recover from that one.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Warm springs are global warming. Cold springs are climate change. And every month is junk climate science!!

March temperatures in New York have been falling for 45 years, and five of the last six months of March have been below normal temperature. But facts aren’t relevant at the New York Times.


https://realclimatescience.com/2018...obal-warming-late-springs-are-climate-change/

 

[Truth Detector]

A little cunt like you.

Awww...aren't you one of those leftist snowflakes that whine when people insult others?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Another fucking moron who thinks we pump Millions of Kilotons crap into the atmosphere every year for over a 100 years without consequence. What a fool.

that is not the issue.......the issue is whether mankind caused global warming.......science concludes, no......

 

[smb]

that is not the issue.......the issue is whether mankind caused global warming.......science concludes, no......

BUUUUUUUUUUUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ! wrong answer. Thanks for playing. Please take the parting gift a dunce hat.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

data does not show cause.......if fact, data shows the exact same change happened 120,000 years ago....

DAMN OUR EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY EARLY.................................ANCESTORS.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Again if you think vitamin c in large doses is perfectly fine then videotape yourself everyday taking 5K mg of vitamin c and post on the board. See how long you can take it. Until then keep your pitiful little juvenile comments to yourself because you are unwilling to put your money where your mouth is little pussy boy.

Or you could be the one doing it and making the video; because it might prove you right and then I would have to call the other data, lies.

Can you post the video's day by day, so if there is a change it can be seen?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Another trumpchump that tries to get the sexual thrills from trying to make people upset. I find you laughable. There is nothing you could say or do that would make me upset. You are gnat on the ass end of Rhino.

OHHHHHHHHH, I tend to disagree.

Myself and everyone else who has observed your downward spiral, can obviously see you lose what little grasp you had on sanity.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Warm springs are global warming. Cold springs are climate change. And every month is junk climate science!!

March temperatures in New York have been falling for 45 years, and five of the last six months of March have been below normal temperature. But facts aren’t relevant at the New York Times.


https://realclimatescience.com/2018...obal-warming-late-springs-are-climate-change/

This entire "Global warming / Climate change" thing is nothing more then a pipe dream of the left.

They keep promoting it for the only reason of:
When it doesn't occur, they will then claim it's only because of the "changes" that they forced everyone to do.

 

[smb]

Or you could be the one doing it and making the video; because it might prove you right and then I would have to call the other data, lies.

Can you post the video's day by day, so if there is a change it can be seen?

Translation: I am pussy that doesn't want to put my money where my mouth is so I will just pretend and call names.


Fucking pathetic.

 

[smb]

Warm springs are global warming. Cold springs are climate change. And every month is junk climate science!!

March temperatures in New York have been falling for 45 years, and five of the last six months of March have been below normal temperature. But facts aren’t relevant at the New York Times.


https://realclimatescience.com/2018...obal-warming-late-springs-are-climate-change/

Why would you assume that some numbskull running an anti-climate change website would tell you the truth. That chart is a lie. NOAA has only been recording the temperature using USHCN stations since 1983.

Since 1987, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI-NC) has used observations from the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) to quantify national- and regional-scale temperature changes in the conterminous United States (CONUS). To that end, there are corrections to USHCN temperature records to account for various historical changes in station location, instrumentation, and observing practice. The USHCN is actually a designated subset of the NOAA Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) Network the USHCN sites having been selected according to their spatial coverage, record length, data completeness, and historical stability. The USHCN, therefore, consists primarily of adjustments for systematic, nonclimatic changes that bias temperature trends of monthly temperature records of long-term COOP stations.

Another bogus list of data from a bogus site.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

BUUUUUUUUUUUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ! wrong answer. Thanks for playing. Please take the parting gift a dunce hat.

so I suppose you can back that up with surprising scientific evidence that humanity caused global warming 120,000 years ago.......

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I am a pussy that doesn't want to put my money where my mouth is so I will just pretend and call names.


Fucking pathetic.

I agree; but there's always a chance you can improve yourself.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Why would you assume that some numbskull running an anti-climate change website would tell you the truth. That chart is a lie. NOAA has only been recording the temperature using USHCN stations since 1983.

Since 1987, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI-NC) has used observations from the U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) to quantify national- and regional-scale temperature changes in the conterminous United States (CONUS). To that end, there are corrections to USHCN temperature records to account for various historical changes in station location, instrumentation, and observing practice. The USHCN is actually a designated subset of the NOAA Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) Network the USHCN sites having been selected according to their spatial coverage, record length, data completeness, and historical stability. The USHCN, therefore, consists primarily of adjustments for systematic, nonclimatic changes that bias temperature trends of monthly temperature records of long-term COOP stations.

Another bogus list of data from a bogus site.

You just copied that off the NOAA website with any attribution, and even less understanding.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

 

[smb]

I agree; but there's always a chance you can improve yourself.

Gee shocking another lying dishonest post from you. What a shocker. Is it possible to be a bigger pussy than you...didn't think so.

 

[smb]

You just copied that off the NOAA website with any attribution, and even less understanding.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

So you are saying that NOAA used USHCN data BEFORE 1987 as your chart indicated?

Also you just copied that chart off of a climate change denier's blog. Pot meet kettle.

 

[cancel2 2022]

So you are saying that NOAA used USHCN data BEFORE 1987 as your chart indicated?

Also you just copied that chart off of a climate change denier's blog. Pot meet kettle.

I am saying you are an idiot and not worth engaging.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Gee shocking another lying dishonest post from you. What a shocker. Is it possible to be a bigger pussy than you...didn't think so.

Dishonest post??

Are you saying that there is no chance of you improving??

 

[smb]

I am saying you are an idiot and not worth engaging.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

Right back at you.

 

[smb]

Dishonest post??

Are you saying that there is no chance of you improving??

I am saying the I have better chance at winning the Power Ball then seeing an honest thought from you.